Evaluating the accuracy of a nutritional screening tool for patients with digestive system tumors: A hierarchical Bayesian latent class meta-analysis.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0316070
Menghao Yang, Na Xiao, Le Tang, Yang Zhang, Yuexiu Wen, Xiuqin Yang
{"title":"Evaluating the accuracy of a nutritional screening tool for patients with digestive system tumors: A hierarchical Bayesian latent class meta-analysis.","authors":"Menghao Yang, Na Xiao, Le Tang, Yang Zhang, Yuexiu Wen, Xiuqin Yang","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0316070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer, particularly tumors of the digestive system, presents a major global health challenge. The incidence and mortality rates of these cancers are increasing, and many patients face significant nutritional risks, which are often overlooked in clinical practice. This oversight can lead to serious health consequences, underscoring the need for effective nutritional assessment tools to improve clinical outcomes. Although several nutritional risk screening tools exist, their specific utility for patients with gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear. This study aimed to address this gap by systematically evaluating the performance of various nutritional screening tools in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of six databases was conducted to identify studies that met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Diagnostic test metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (positive and negative) were estimated using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. This approach was used to compare the accuracy of different nutritional screening scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis, assessing six nutritional screening tools: the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Malnutrition Screening Tool, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, Nutritional Risk Index, and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Among these, the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment demonstrated the highest performance, with a sensitivity of 0.911 (95% confidence interval: 0.866-0.942) and a specificity of 0.805 (95% confidence interval: 0.674-0.891), outperforming the other screening tools.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirms the effectiveness of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment in identifying malnutrition risk among patients with digestive system tumors. However, as this research focused on a Chinese population, future studies should encompass a broader geographic scope and work toward standardized assessment criteria to enhance the global validation and refinement of nutritional screening tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 12","pages":"e0316070"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0316070","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer, particularly tumors of the digestive system, presents a major global health challenge. The incidence and mortality rates of these cancers are increasing, and many patients face significant nutritional risks, which are often overlooked in clinical practice. This oversight can lead to serious health consequences, underscoring the need for effective nutritional assessment tools to improve clinical outcomes. Although several nutritional risk screening tools exist, their specific utility for patients with gastrointestinal tumors remains unclear. This study aimed to address this gap by systematically evaluating the performance of various nutritional screening tools in this patient population.

Methods: A systematic search of six databases was conducted to identify studies that met predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Diagnostic test metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (positive and negative) were estimated using a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model. This approach was used to compare the accuracy of different nutritional screening scales.

Results: A total of 33 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis, assessing six nutritional screening tools: the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, Malnutrition Screening Tool, Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form, Nutritional Risk Index, and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Among these, the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment demonstrated the highest performance, with a sensitivity of 0.911 (95% confidence interval: 0.866-0.942) and a specificity of 0.805 (95% confidence interval: 0.674-0.891), outperforming the other screening tools.

Conclusions: This study confirms the effectiveness of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment in identifying malnutrition risk among patients with digestive system tumors. However, as this research focused on a Chinese population, future studies should encompass a broader geographic scope and work toward standardized assessment criteria to enhance the global validation and refinement of nutritional screening tools.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信