A Biomechanical Comparison Between Conventional, Sumo, and Hex-Bar Deadlifts Among Resistance Trained Women.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Andreas H Gundersen, Roland van den Tillaar, Hallvard N Falch, Andrea B Fredriksen, Stian Larsen
{"title":"A Biomechanical Comparison Between Conventional, Sumo, and Hex-Bar Deadlifts Among Resistance Trained Women.","authors":"Andreas H Gundersen, Roland van den Tillaar, Hallvard N Falch, Andrea B Fredriksen, Stian Larsen","doi":"10.1519/JSC.0000000000005011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Gundersen, AH, van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, Fredriksen, AB, and Larsen, S. A biomechanical comparison between conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts among resistance trained women. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 281-288, 2025-The deadlift is a multijoint exercise frequently used to strengthen the lower extremities and spinal erectors. Despite variations, such as the conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, little is known about how these techniques affect the concentric phase of maximal deadlifts among strength trained women. Therefore, this study used statistical parametric mapping to compare kinematics, net joint moments (NJMs), and surface electromyography amplitude between these deadlift variations during the last repetition of a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) in strength trained women. Eleven women (body mass: 67.64 ± 7.27 kg, height: 161.91 ± 3.05 cm, age: 23.18 ± 3.46 years) performed 3RM deadlifts in conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, lifting 103.18 ± 18.47, 101.54 ± 15.01, and 99.70 ± 15.94 kg, respectively. The main findings showed that deadlifting with conventional and sumo techniques resulted in larger hip NJMs near the lockout. Conversely, deadlifting with the hex-bar technique resulted in greater barbell velocity, knee NJMs, and increased hip and knee flexion angles. Therefore, when training maximal 3RM deadlifts, we suggest that hex-bar deadlifts may be beneficial for targeting knee extensors and enhancing barbell velocity among strength trained women. Conversely, sumo and conventional deadlifts may be more effective for targeting the hip extensors near the lockout during the last repetition of 3RM deadlifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":17129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","volume":" ","pages":"281-288"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000005011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Gundersen, AH, van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, Fredriksen, AB, and Larsen, S. A biomechanical comparison between conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts among resistance trained women. J Strength Cond Res 39(3): 281-288, 2025-The deadlift is a multijoint exercise frequently used to strengthen the lower extremities and spinal erectors. Despite variations, such as the conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, little is known about how these techniques affect the concentric phase of maximal deadlifts among strength trained women. Therefore, this study used statistical parametric mapping to compare kinematics, net joint moments (NJMs), and surface electromyography amplitude between these deadlift variations during the last repetition of a 3 repetition maximum (3RM) in strength trained women. Eleven women (body mass: 67.64 ± 7.27 kg, height: 161.91 ± 3.05 cm, age: 23.18 ± 3.46 years) performed 3RM deadlifts in conventional, sumo, and hex-bar deadlifts, lifting 103.18 ± 18.47, 101.54 ± 15.01, and 99.70 ± 15.94 kg, respectively. The main findings showed that deadlifting with conventional and sumo techniques resulted in larger hip NJMs near the lockout. Conversely, deadlifting with the hex-bar technique resulted in greater barbell velocity, knee NJMs, and increased hip and knee flexion angles. Therefore, when training maximal 3RM deadlifts, we suggest that hex-bar deadlifts may be beneficial for targeting knee extensors and enhancing barbell velocity among strength trained women. Conversely, sumo and conventional deadlifts may be more effective for targeting the hip extensors near the lockout during the last repetition of 3RM deadlifts.

传统、相扑和六杠硬举在阻力训练女性中的生物力学比较。
摘要:Gundersen, AH, van den Tillaar, R, Falch, HN, Fredriksen, AB和Larsen, S.对女性阻力训练中传统、相扑和六杠硬举的生物力学比较。[J]力量杂志XX(X): 000- 000,2024 -硬举是一种多关节运动,经常用于加强下肢和脊柱竖立肌。尽管有一些变化,如传统的、相击的和六杠的硬举,但对于这些技术如何影响力量训练的女性最大硬举的同心阶段,我们知之甚少。因此,本研究使用统计参数映射来比较运动、净关节力矩(NJMs)和表面肌电图振幅在力量训练女性最后3次最大重复(3RM)时这些硬举变化之间的差异。11名女性(体重:67.64±7.27 kg,身高:161.91±3.05 cm,年龄:23.18±3.46岁)完成常规、相扑、六杠三种类型的3RM硬举,分别完成103.18±18.47、101.54±15.01、99.70±15.94 kg。主要研究结果表明,采用传统和相扑技术进行硬举会导致髋关节闭锁附近出现较大的NJMs。相反,用六杠技术进行硬举可以提高杠铃速度,提高膝关节NJMs,增加髋关节和膝关节的屈曲角度。因此,当训练最大3RM硬举时,我们建议在力量训练的女性中,六杠硬举可能有利于针对膝关节伸肌和提高杠铃速度。相反,相扑和传统的硬举在最后一次重复3RM硬举时,可能更有效地针对锁定附近的髋伸肌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.40%
发文量
384
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The editorial mission of The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (JSCR) is to advance the knowledge about strength and conditioning through research. A unique aspect of this journal is that it includes recommendations for the practical use of research findings. While the journal name identifies strength and conditioning as separate entities, strength is considered a part of conditioning. This journal wishes to promote the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts which add to our understanding of conditioning and sport through applied exercise science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信