Keith A Langmack, Gavin G Alexander, Joshua Gardiner, Angela McKenna, Ewan Shawcroft
{"title":"An audit of the impact of the introduction of a commercial artificial intelligence driven auto-contouring tool into a radiotherapy department.","authors":"Keith A Langmack, Gavin G Alexander, Joshua Gardiner, Angela McKenna, Ewan Shawcroft","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To audit prospectively the accuracy, time saving and utility of a commercial artificial intelligence auto-contouring tool (AIAC). To assess the reallocation of time released by AIAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We audited the perceived usefulness (PU), clinical acceptability and reallocation of time during the introduction of a commercial AIAC. The time from CT to plan completion (PPTT) was audited for several pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>248 patients and 32 staff were included in this audit. PU increased with exposure to AIAC (p < 0.05). For 80% of sites AIAC was timesaving and AI contours were clinically acceptable after minor edits. Edits had little impact on doses for the majority of cases. Median PPTT reduced by 5.5 (breast) and 9 (prostate) working days (p < 0.01). Radiographers spent more time on other tasks within planning. Oncologists improved their work-life balance and increased time spent on professional development and research by up to 2 hours per week.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All users of AIAC found it a useful tool and it improved their productivity. The contours were high quality and needed little editing. It reduced contouring time and reduced PPTT by several days in some cases. The reallocated time was staff group dependent.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The time released by the use of AIAC can lead to a reduction in the PPTT by up to 9 days. It also improves the work-life balance of oncologists by reducing the time spent out of hours contouring.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To audit prospectively the accuracy, time saving and utility of a commercial artificial intelligence auto-contouring tool (AIAC). To assess the reallocation of time released by AIAC.
Methods: We audited the perceived usefulness (PU), clinical acceptability and reallocation of time during the introduction of a commercial AIAC. The time from CT to plan completion (PPTT) was audited for several pathways.
Results: 248 patients and 32 staff were included in this audit. PU increased with exposure to AIAC (p < 0.05). For 80% of sites AIAC was timesaving and AI contours were clinically acceptable after minor edits. Edits had little impact on doses for the majority of cases. Median PPTT reduced by 5.5 (breast) and 9 (prostate) working days (p < 0.01). Radiographers spent more time on other tasks within planning. Oncologists improved their work-life balance and increased time spent on professional development and research by up to 2 hours per week.
Conclusions: All users of AIAC found it a useful tool and it improved their productivity. The contours were high quality and needed little editing. It reduced contouring time and reduced PPTT by several days in some cases. The reallocated time was staff group dependent.
Advances in knowledge: The time released by the use of AIAC can lead to a reduction in the PPTT by up to 9 days. It also improves the work-life balance of oncologists by reducing the time spent out of hours contouring.
期刊介绍:
BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences.
Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840
- Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks
- ISSN: 0007-1285
- eISSN: 1748-880X
Open Access option