An audit of the impact of the introduction of a commercial artificial intelligence driven auto-contouring tool into a radiotherapy department.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Keith A Langmack, Gavin G Alexander, Joshua Gardiner, Angela McKenna, Ewan Shawcroft
{"title":"An audit of the impact of the introduction of a commercial artificial intelligence driven auto-contouring tool into a radiotherapy department.","authors":"Keith A Langmack, Gavin G Alexander, Joshua Gardiner, Angela McKenna, Ewan Shawcroft","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To audit prospectively the accuracy, time saving and utility of a commercial artificial intelligence auto-contouring tool (AIAC). To assess the reallocation of time released by AIAC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We audited the perceived usefulness (PU), clinical acceptability and reallocation of time during the introduction of a commercial AIAC. The time from CT to plan completion (PPTT) was audited for several pathways.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>248 patients and 32 staff were included in this audit. PU increased with exposure to AIAC (p < 0.05). For 80% of sites AIAC was timesaving and AI contours were clinically acceptable after minor edits. Edits had little impact on doses for the majority of cases. Median PPTT reduced by 5.5 (breast) and 9 (prostate) working days (p < 0.01). Radiographers spent more time on other tasks within planning. Oncologists improved their work-life balance and increased time spent on professional development and research by up to 2 hours per week.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All users of AIAC found it a useful tool and it improved their productivity. The contours were high quality and needed little editing. It reduced contouring time and reduced PPTT by several days in some cases. The reallocated time was staff group dependent.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>The time released by the use of AIAC can lead to a reduction in the PPTT by up to 9 days. It also improves the work-life balance of oncologists by reducing the time spent out of hours contouring.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To audit prospectively the accuracy, time saving and utility of a commercial artificial intelligence auto-contouring tool (AIAC). To assess the reallocation of time released by AIAC.

Methods: We audited the perceived usefulness (PU), clinical acceptability and reallocation of time during the introduction of a commercial AIAC. The time from CT to plan completion (PPTT) was audited for several pathways.

Results: 248 patients and 32 staff were included in this audit. PU increased with exposure to AIAC (p < 0.05). For 80% of sites AIAC was timesaving and AI contours were clinically acceptable after minor edits. Edits had little impact on doses for the majority of cases. Median PPTT reduced by 5.5 (breast) and 9 (prostate) working days (p < 0.01). Radiographers spent more time on other tasks within planning. Oncologists improved their work-life balance and increased time spent on professional development and research by up to 2 hours per week.

Conclusions: All users of AIAC found it a useful tool and it improved their productivity. The contours were high quality and needed little editing. It reduced contouring time and reduced PPTT by several days in some cases. The reallocated time was staff group dependent.

Advances in knowledge: The time released by the use of AIAC can lead to a reduction in the PPTT by up to 9 days. It also improves the work-life balance of oncologists by reducing the time spent out of hours contouring.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信