Change Meat Resistance: Systematic Literature Review on Consumer Resistance to the Alternative Protein Transition.

IF 10.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
M C Onwezen, G Nassar, J A Bouma
{"title":"Change Meat Resistance: Systematic Literature Review on Consumer Resistance to the Alternative Protein Transition.","authors":"M C Onwezen, G Nassar, J A Bouma","doi":"10.1146/annurev-food-111523-121744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Consumer resistance significantly impedes the transition from animal-derived proteins to alternative protein sources through a dual mechanism: consumer reluctance to change entrenched meat-eating habits and hesitation among policymakers, marketers, and practitioners due to anticipated resistance. The concept of resistance is intricate and viewed diversely across research disciplines. We conducted an extensive systematic literature review supplemented by an artificial intelligence-based approach. We evaluated 3,387 studies to identify 51 key papers. The results reveal that resistance is under-researched. Resistance to plant-based diets is associated with practical barriers, whereas resistance to reducing meat consumption is tied more to moral and social aspects. Resistance predominantly manifests among unmotivated meat lovers with strong meat-eating habits. On a positive note, resistance reflects consumer concerns, tends to diminish over time, is overrated, and is specifically linked to specific consumer groups. Thus, addressing resistance is vital, as it facilitates the transition to a more sustainable and healthy food supply that relies less on animal proteins.</p>","PeriodicalId":8187,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-111523-121744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Consumer resistance significantly impedes the transition from animal-derived proteins to alternative protein sources through a dual mechanism: consumer reluctance to change entrenched meat-eating habits and hesitation among policymakers, marketers, and practitioners due to anticipated resistance. The concept of resistance is intricate and viewed diversely across research disciplines. We conducted an extensive systematic literature review supplemented by an artificial intelligence-based approach. We evaluated 3,387 studies to identify 51 key papers. The results reveal that resistance is under-researched. Resistance to plant-based diets is associated with practical barriers, whereas resistance to reducing meat consumption is tied more to moral and social aspects. Resistance predominantly manifests among unmotivated meat lovers with strong meat-eating habits. On a positive note, resistance reflects consumer concerns, tends to diminish over time, is overrated, and is specifically linked to specific consumer groups. Thus, addressing resistance is vital, as it facilitates the transition to a more sustainable and healthy food supply that relies less on animal proteins.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
20
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since 2010, the Annual Review of Food Science and Technology has been a key source for current developments in the multidisciplinary field. The covered topics span food microbiology, food-borne pathogens, and fermentation; food engineering, chemistry, biochemistry, rheology, and sensory properties; novel ingredients and nutrigenomics; emerging technologies in food processing and preservation; and applications of biotechnology and nanomaterials in food systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信