Toward a Dynamic Allocation Strategy for Deadline-Oriented Resource and Job Management in HPC Systems

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Barry Linnert, Cesar Augusto F. De Rose, Hans-Ulrich Heiss
{"title":"Toward a Dynamic Allocation Strategy for Deadline-Oriented Resource and Job Management in HPC Systems","authors":"Barry Linnert,&nbsp;Cesar Augusto F. De Rose,&nbsp;Hans-Ulrich Heiss","doi":"10.1002/cpe.8310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As high-performance computing (HPC) becomes a tool used in many different workflows, quality of service (QoS) becomes increasingly important. In many cases, this includes the reliable execution of an HPC job and the generation of the results by a certain deadline. The resource and job management system (RJMS) or simply RMS is responsible for receiving the job requests and executing the jobs with a deadline-oriented policy to support the workflows. In this article, we evaluate how well static resource management policies cope with deadline-constrained HPC jobs and explore two variations of a dynamic policy in this context. As the Hilbert curve-based approach used by the SLURM workload manager represents the state-of-the-art in production environments, it was selected as one of the static allocation strategies. The Manhattan median approach as a second allocation strategy was introduced as a research work that aims to minimize the communication overhead of the parallel programs by providing compact partitions more than the Hilbert curve approach. In contrast to the static partitions provided by the Hilbert curve approach and the Manhattan median approach, the leak approach focuses on supporting dynamic runtime behavior of the jobs and assigning nodes of the HPC system on demand at runtime. Since the contiguous leak version also relies on a compact set of nodes, the noncontiguous leak can provide additional nodes at a greater distance from the nodes already used by the job. Our preliminary results clearly show that a dynamic policy is needed to meet the requirements of a modern deadline-oriented RMS scenario.</p>","PeriodicalId":55214,"journal":{"name":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpe.8310","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpe.8310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As high-performance computing (HPC) becomes a tool used in many different workflows, quality of service (QoS) becomes increasingly important. In many cases, this includes the reliable execution of an HPC job and the generation of the results by a certain deadline. The resource and job management system (RJMS) or simply RMS is responsible for receiving the job requests and executing the jobs with a deadline-oriented policy to support the workflows. In this article, we evaluate how well static resource management policies cope with deadline-constrained HPC jobs and explore two variations of a dynamic policy in this context. As the Hilbert curve-based approach used by the SLURM workload manager represents the state-of-the-art in production environments, it was selected as one of the static allocation strategies. The Manhattan median approach as a second allocation strategy was introduced as a research work that aims to minimize the communication overhead of the parallel programs by providing compact partitions more than the Hilbert curve approach. In contrast to the static partitions provided by the Hilbert curve approach and the Manhattan median approach, the leak approach focuses on supporting dynamic runtime behavior of the jobs and assigning nodes of the HPC system on demand at runtime. Since the contiguous leak version also relies on a compact set of nodes, the noncontiguous leak can provide additional nodes at a greater distance from the nodes already used by the job. Our preliminary results clearly show that a dynamic policy is needed to meet the requirements of a modern deadline-oriented RMS scenario.

Abstract Image

面向最后期限的高性能计算系统资源与作业管理的动态分配策略
随着高性能计算(HPC)成为许多不同工作流程中使用的工具,服务质量(QoS)变得越来越重要。在许多情况下,这包括可靠地执行HPC作业和在特定截止日期前生成结果。资源和作业管理系统(RJMS)或简称为RMS负责接收作业请求,并使用面向截止日期的策略执行作业,以支持工作流。在本文中,我们将评估静态资源管理策略如何很好地处理期限受限的HPC作业,并在此上下文中探讨动态策略的两种变体。由于SLURM工作负载管理器使用的基于Hilbert曲线的方法代表了生产环境中的最新技术,因此选择它作为静态分配策略之一。作为第二种分配策略的曼哈顿中位数方法是作为一项研究工作引入的,旨在通过提供比希尔伯特曲线方法更紧凑的分区来最小化并行程序的通信开销。与Hilbert曲线方法和Manhattan中位数方法提供的静态分区相比,泄漏方法侧重于支持作业的动态运行时行为,并在运行时按需分配HPC系统的节点。由于连续泄漏版本还依赖于一组紧凑的节点,因此不连续泄漏可以在距离作业已经使用的节点较远的地方提供额外的节点。我们的初步结果清楚地表明,需要动态策略来满足现代面向截止日期的RMS场景的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience
Concurrency and Computation-Practice & Experience 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
664
审稿时长
9.6 months
期刊介绍: Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience (CCPE) publishes high-quality, original research papers, and authoritative research review papers, in the overlapping fields of: Parallel and distributed computing; High-performance computing; Computational and data science; Artificial intelligence and machine learning; Big data applications, algorithms, and systems; Network science; Ontologies and semantics; Security and privacy; Cloud/edge/fog computing; Green computing; and Quantum computing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信