Simulated Impacts of Harvesting Chamaedorea linearis and C. pinnatifrons (Arecaceae): Implications for Their Conservation

IF 1.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Biotropica Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1111/btp.13420
Paula Cepeda, Henrik Balslev, Carolina Isaza
{"title":"Simulated Impacts of Harvesting Chamaedorea linearis and C. pinnatifrons (Arecaceae): Implications for Their Conservation","authors":"Paula Cepeda,&nbsp;Henrik Balslev,&nbsp;Carolina Isaza","doi":"10.1111/btp.13420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Palms are important sources of nontimber forest products. One of their most common uses is as ornamentals, which often involves harvesting whole individuals or plant parts from wild populations. <i>Chamaedorea linearis</i> and <i>Chamaedorea pinnatifrons</i> are still not excessively harvested, but they have substantial ornamental potential, and their populations are decreasing. The use of a wild species can contribute to its conservation if the use is governed by adequate harvest rates. We simulated harvest impacts on the population dynamics of <i>C. linearis</i> and <i>C. pinnatifrons</i> in an Andean montane forest in Parque Natural Chicaque, Colombia, using integral projection models (IPMs) over the period 2019–2021. We projected management scenarios including the harvest of juveniles, as well as leaves and fruits of adults. In our model, the finite growth rate of <i>C. linearis</i> decreased (<i>λ</i> = 0.76–0.91) whereas in <i>C. pinnatifrons</i> it remained stable (<i>λ</i> = 0.98–1.04). The simulations of the harvest of juveniles and leaves suggested negative impacts on the populations' sizes and in the transient growth rate (<i>λ</i><sub>20</sub>) in the long term when compared to no harvest. Fruits harvest had no considerable effects under 20% of removal once per year in both of the populations, but had a decrease in populations under 20% of removal twice and four times a year. We conclude that sustainable use strategies should focus on protecting juveniles in both populations. Fruit harvest for propagation can be promoted as a sustainable use strategy that does not endanger their conservation.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8982,"journal":{"name":"Biotropica","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotropica","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/btp.13420","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Palms are important sources of nontimber forest products. One of their most common uses is as ornamentals, which often involves harvesting whole individuals or plant parts from wild populations. Chamaedorea linearis and Chamaedorea pinnatifrons are still not excessively harvested, but they have substantial ornamental potential, and their populations are decreasing. The use of a wild species can contribute to its conservation if the use is governed by adequate harvest rates. We simulated harvest impacts on the population dynamics of C. linearis and C. pinnatifrons in an Andean montane forest in Parque Natural Chicaque, Colombia, using integral projection models (IPMs) over the period 2019–2021. We projected management scenarios including the harvest of juveniles, as well as leaves and fruits of adults. In our model, the finite growth rate of C. linearis decreased (λ = 0.76–0.91) whereas in C. pinnatifrons it remained stable (λ = 0.98–1.04). The simulations of the harvest of juveniles and leaves suggested negative impacts on the populations' sizes and in the transient growth rate (λ20) in the long term when compared to no harvest. Fruits harvest had no considerable effects under 20% of removal once per year in both of the populations, but had a decrease in populations under 20% of removal twice and four times a year. We conclude that sustainable use strategies should focus on protecting juveniles in both populations. Fruit harvest for propagation can be promoted as a sustainable use strategy that does not endanger their conservation.

Abstract Image

棕榈树是非木材森林产品的重要来源。它们最常见的用途之一是作为观赏植物,这通常涉及从野生种群中采伐整个个体或植物部分。线形棕榈(Chamaedorea linearis)和羽状棕榈(Chamaedorea pinnatifrons)仍未被过度采伐,但它们具有很大的观赏潜力,而且数量正在减少。如果野生物种的利用受到适当采伐率的制约,那么利用野生物种将有助于保护野生物种。我们使用整体预测模型(IPMs)模拟了 2019-2021 年期间采伐对哥伦比亚奇卡克自然公园(Parque Natural Chicaque)安第斯高山森林中线形草和羽状草种群动态的影响。我们预测的管理方案包括采收幼虫以及成虫的叶片和果实。在我们的模型中,C. linearis 的有限增长率下降(λ = 0.76-0.91),而 C. pinnatifrons 的有限增长率保持稳定(λ = 0.98-1.04)。与不采收相比,采收幼体和叶片的模拟结果表明,长期采收会对种群数量和瞬时增长率(λ20)产生负面影响。在每年采收一次果实(20%)的情况下,采收果实对这两个种群没有显著影响,但在每年采收两次和四次果实(20%)的情况下,采收果实对种群的影响会减小。我们的结论是,可持续利用战略应侧重于保护两个种群的幼体。收获果实用于繁殖可以作为一种可持续利用战略加以推广,而不会危及其保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotropica
Biotropica 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Ranked by the ISI index, Biotropica is a highly regarded source of original research on the ecology, conservation and management of all tropical ecosystems, and on the evolution, behavior, and population biology of tropical organisms. Published on behalf of the Association of Tropical Biology and Conservation, the journal''s Special Issues and Special Sections quickly become indispensable references for researchers in the field. Biotropica publishes timely Papers, Reviews, Commentaries, and Insights. Commentaries generate thought-provoking ideas that frequently initiate fruitful debate and discussion, while Reviews provide authoritative and analytical overviews of topics of current conservation or ecological importance. The newly instituted category Insights replaces Short Communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信