Feedback Survey for an Online Learning Module: Developing and Validating a Scale to Measure Nursing Students' Self-Assessed Knowledge and Perceptions of Older People and Confidence in Working With Them

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sherry Dahlke, Kathleen F. Hunter, Jeffrey I. Butler, Matthew Pietrosanu
{"title":"Feedback Survey for an Online Learning Module: Developing and Validating a Scale to Measure Nursing Students' Self-Assessed Knowledge and Perceptions of Older People and Confidence in Working With Them","authors":"Sherry Dahlke,&nbsp;Kathleen F. Hunter,&nbsp;Jeffrey I. Butler,&nbsp;Matthew Pietrosanu","doi":"10.1111/opn.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To determine if an online learning module on older people's care improved nursing students' self-assessed knowledge, and perceptions of older people, we developed a brief Feedback Survey. The aim of this study was to examine the internal consistency (a type of reliability) and construct validity of the feedback survey.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary analysis of data from the Awakening Canadian's to Ageism and McCalla e-learning intervention studies for postsecondary nursing students. Factor analysis and reliability analysis (via standardised Cronbach's alpha) were performed on the four-question, five-point Likert-type Feedback Survey, which was included in both intervention studies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Factor analysis yielded one factor interpretable as general satisfaction in students' experience with the module and perceived benefits of having completed it. Standardised Cronbach's alpha for this scale was high at 0.92, which suggests excellent internal consistency.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications for Practice</h3>\n \n <p>The feedback survey is a convenient and time-efficient measure to examine student nurses' self-assessed improvements in knowledge, perceptions about older people. The survey has potential for adaptation to measure perceived outcomes of other nursing student- focused education.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48651,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/opn.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Older People Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/opn.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To determine if an online learning module on older people's care improved nursing students' self-assessed knowledge, and perceptions of older people, we developed a brief Feedback Survey. The aim of this study was to examine the internal consistency (a type of reliability) and construct validity of the feedback survey.

Design and Methods

Secondary analysis of data from the Awakening Canadian's to Ageism and McCalla e-learning intervention studies for postsecondary nursing students. Factor analysis and reliability analysis (via standardised Cronbach's alpha) were performed on the four-question, five-point Likert-type Feedback Survey, which was included in both intervention studies.

Results

Factor analysis yielded one factor interpretable as general satisfaction in students' experience with the module and perceived benefits of having completed it. Standardised Cronbach's alpha for this scale was high at 0.92, which suggests excellent internal consistency.

Implications for Practice

The feedback survey is a convenient and time-efficient measure to examine student nurses' self-assessed improvements in knowledge, perceptions about older people. The survey has potential for adaptation to measure perceived outcomes of other nursing student- focused education.

在线学习模块反馈调查:开发并验证量表以测量护理专业学生对老年人的自评知识和看法以及与老年人共事的信心
目的 为了确定老年人护理在线学习模块是否能提高护理专业学生的自我知识评估以及对老年人的看法,我们开发了一个简短的反馈调查。本研究的目的是检验反馈调查的内部一致性(可靠性的一种)和构建有效性。 设计和方法 对来自 "唤醒加拿大人的老龄歧视 "和 McCalla 针对护理专业大专学生的电子学习干预研究的数据进行二次分析。对这两项干预研究中都包含的四问五点李克特反馈调查进行了因子分析和可靠性分析(通过标准化的克朗巴赫α)。 结果 通过因子分析得出了一个因子,可解释为学生对该模块体验的总体满意度以及完成该模块后所感受到的益处。该量表的标准化 Cronbach's alpha 高达 0.92,表明其内部一致性极佳。 对实践的启示 反馈调查是一项方便、省时的措施,可用于检查学生护士对老年人知识和看法的自我评估。该调查可用于测量其他以护理专业学生为重点的教育的感知结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: International Journal of Older People Nursing welcomes scholarly papers on all aspects of older people nursing including research, practice, education, management, and policy. We publish manuscripts that further scholarly inquiry and improve practice through innovation and creativity in all aspects of gerontological nursing. We encourage submission of integrative and systematic reviews; original quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods research; secondary analyses of existing data; historical works; theoretical and conceptual analyses; evidence based practice projects and other practice improvement reports; and policy analyses. All submissions must reflect consideration of IJOPN''s international readership and include explicit perspective on gerontological nursing. We particularly welcome submissions from regions of the world underrepresented in the gerontological nursing literature and from settings and situations not typically addressed in that literature. Editorial perspectives are published in each issue. Editorial perspectives are submitted by invitation only.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信