Charting the Future of Assessments

Q3 Social Sciences
Patrick Kyllonen, Amit Sevak, Teresa Ober, Ikkyu Choi, Jesse Sparks, Daniel Fishtein
{"title":"Charting the Future of Assessments","authors":"Patrick Kyllonen,&nbsp;Amit Sevak,&nbsp;Teresa Ober,&nbsp;Ikkyu Choi,&nbsp;Jesse Sparks,&nbsp;Daniel Fishtein","doi":"10.1002/ets2.12388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Assessment refers to a broad array of approaches for measuring or evaluating a person's (or group of persons') skills, behaviors, dispositions, or other attributes. Assessments range from standardized tests used in admissions, employee selection, licensure examinations, and domestic and international large-scale assessments of cognitive and behavioral skills to formative K–12 classroom curricular assessments. The various types of assessments are used for a wide variety of purposes, but they also have many common elements, such as standards for their reliability, validity, and fairness—even classroom assessments have standards.</p><p>\n \n </p><p>In this paper, we argue and provide evidence for our belief that the future of assessment contains challenges but is promising. The challenges include risks associated with security and exposure of personal data, test score bias, and inappropriate test uses, all of which may be exacerbated by the growing infiltration of artificial intelligence (AI) into our lives. The promise is increasing opportunities for testing to help individuals achieve their education and career goals and contribute to well-being and overall quality of life. To help achieve this promise we focus on the evidence-based science of measurement in education and workplace learning, a theme throughout this paper.</p>","PeriodicalId":11972,"journal":{"name":"ETS Research Report Series","volume":"2024 1","pages":"1-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ets2.12388","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ETS Research Report Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ets2.12388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment refers to a broad array of approaches for measuring or evaluating a person's (or group of persons') skills, behaviors, dispositions, or other attributes. Assessments range from standardized tests used in admissions, employee selection, licensure examinations, and domestic and international large-scale assessments of cognitive and behavioral skills to formative K–12 classroom curricular assessments. The various types of assessments are used for a wide variety of purposes, but they also have many common elements, such as standards for their reliability, validity, and fairness—even classroom assessments have standards.

In this paper, we argue and provide evidence for our belief that the future of assessment contains challenges but is promising. The challenges include risks associated with security and exposure of personal data, test score bias, and inappropriate test uses, all of which may be exacerbated by the growing infiltration of artificial intelligence (AI) into our lives. The promise is increasing opportunities for testing to help individuals achieve their education and career goals and contribute to well-being and overall quality of life. To help achieve this promise we focus on the evidence-based science of measurement in education and workplace learning, a theme throughout this paper.

Abstract Image

展望评估的未来
评估是指测量或评估一个人(或一群人)的技能、行为、性格或其他属性的一系列广泛方法。评估范围从入学、员工选拔、执照考试、国内和国际大规模的认知和行为技能评估到形成性的K-12课堂课程评估。各种类型的评估用于各种各样的目的,但它们也有许多共同的元素,例如可靠性,有效性和公平性的标准-甚至课堂评估也有标准。在本文中,我们论证并提供证据证明我们的信念,即评估的未来包含挑战,但是有希望的。这些挑战包括与安全和个人数据暴露、考试分数偏差和不适当的考试使用相关的风险,所有这些都可能因人工智能(AI)日益渗透到我们的生活中而加剧。希望是增加测试的机会,以帮助个人实现他们的教育和职业目标,并为福祉和整体生活质量做出贡献。为了帮助实现这一承诺,我们将重点放在教育和工作场所学习中测量的循证科学上,这是贯穿本文的主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ETS Research Report Series
ETS Research Report Series Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信