The Optimal Type and Dose of Exercise for Elevating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels in Patients With Depression: A Systematic Review With Pairwise, Network, and Dose–Response Meta-Analyses

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Zhu Yuping, Lei Tianbi, Shi Wentao, Li Yun, Zhang Guodong
{"title":"The Optimal Type and Dose of Exercise for Elevating Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Levels in Patients With Depression: A Systematic Review With Pairwise, Network, and Dose–Response Meta-Analyses","authors":"Zhu Yuping,&nbsp;Lei Tianbi,&nbsp;Shi Wentao,&nbsp;Li Yun,&nbsp;Zhang Guodong","doi":"10.1155/da/5716755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Background:</b> Reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels have been linked to increased depression risk. While physical exercise is known to alleviate depressive symptoms and elevate BDNF levels, the effects of different exercise modalities and doses, along with their dose–response relationships, remain unclear.</p>\n <p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to systematically evaluate the effects of various exercise types and doses on BDNF levels in patients with depression through pairwise meta-analysis, network meta-analysis (NMA), and dose–response NMA and to provide personalized exercise prescription recommendations.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining exercise’s impact on BDNF levels in depression. Pairwise and NMA compared six exercise modalities: continuous aerobic exercise (CAE), resistance exercise (RE), combined aerobic and resistance exercise (AERE), yoga, Qigong, and mindfulness. Dose–response NMA was used to assess the relationships between exercise dose and BDNF levels.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> Thirty-six RCTs with 2515 participants were included. The pairwise meta-analysis indicated that all exercise interventions significantly elevated BDNF levels in patients with depression, with AERE, RE, and yoga demonstrating the most substantial effects. NMA rankings suggested that AERE was the most effective intervention, followed by RE, yoga, Qigong, mindfulness, and CAE. Dose–response NMA revealed a positive nonlinear dose–response relationship between total exercise volume and BDNF levels, with an optimal effective dose identified at ~610 METs-min/week. Beyond 1000 metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs)-min/week, increases in BDNF levels appeared to plateau. Moreover, each exercise type had distinct dose–response patterns, with RE and AERE having relatively higher optimal effective dose ranges, while CAE, yoga, Qigong, and mindfulness exhibited lower optimal ranges.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusions:</b> AERE, RE, and yoga are effective interventions for enhancing BDNF levels in patients with depression, with Qigong, mindfulness, and CAE being comparatively less effective. A positive nonlinear dose–response relationship between exercise volume and BDNF levels was observed. Further research is needed to refine dose–response relationships in this population.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55179,"journal":{"name":"Depression and Anxiety","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/da/5716755","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Depression and Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/da/5716755","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reduced brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels have been linked to increased depression risk. While physical exercise is known to alleviate depressive symptoms and elevate BDNF levels, the effects of different exercise modalities and doses, along with their dose–response relationships, remain unclear.

Objective: This study aims to systematically evaluate the effects of various exercise types and doses on BDNF levels in patients with depression through pairwise meta-analysis, network meta-analysis (NMA), and dose–response NMA and to provide personalized exercise prescription recommendations.

Methods: A comprehensive search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining exercise’s impact on BDNF levels in depression. Pairwise and NMA compared six exercise modalities: continuous aerobic exercise (CAE), resistance exercise (RE), combined aerobic and resistance exercise (AERE), yoga, Qigong, and mindfulness. Dose–response NMA was used to assess the relationships between exercise dose and BDNF levels.

Results: Thirty-six RCTs with 2515 participants were included. The pairwise meta-analysis indicated that all exercise interventions significantly elevated BDNF levels in patients with depression, with AERE, RE, and yoga demonstrating the most substantial effects. NMA rankings suggested that AERE was the most effective intervention, followed by RE, yoga, Qigong, mindfulness, and CAE. Dose–response NMA revealed a positive nonlinear dose–response relationship between total exercise volume and BDNF levels, with an optimal effective dose identified at ~610 METs-min/week. Beyond 1000 metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs)-min/week, increases in BDNF levels appeared to plateau. Moreover, each exercise type had distinct dose–response patterns, with RE and AERE having relatively higher optimal effective dose ranges, while CAE, yoga, Qigong, and mindfulness exhibited lower optimal ranges.

Conclusions: AERE, RE, and yoga are effective interventions for enhancing BDNF levels in patients with depression, with Qigong, mindfulness, and CAE being comparatively less effective. A positive nonlinear dose–response relationship between exercise volume and BDNF levels was observed. Further research is needed to refine dose–response relationships in this population.

Abstract Image

提高抑郁症患者脑源性神经营养因子水平的最佳运动类型和剂量:配对分析、网络分析和剂量反应元分析的系统性综述
背景:脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平降低与抑郁症风险增加有关。虽然已知体育锻炼可以缓解抑郁症状并提高BDNF水平,但不同运动方式和剂量的影响以及它们的剂量-反应关系仍不清楚。目的:本研究旨在通过配对meta分析、网络meta分析(network meta-analysis, NMA)和剂量-反应NMA,系统评价不同运动类型和剂量对抑郁症患者BDNF水平的影响,并提供个性化的运动处方建议。方法:一项全面的搜索确定了随机对照试验(rct),研究运动对抑郁症患者BDNF水平的影响。两两和NMA比较了六种运动模式:持续有氧运动(CAE)、阻力运动(RE)、有氧和阻力联合运动(AERE)、瑜伽、气功和正念。剂量-反应NMA用于评估运动剂量与BDNF水平之间的关系。结果:纳入36项随机对照试验,共2515名受试者。两两荟萃分析表明,所有运动干预都能显著提高抑郁症患者的BDNF水平,其中AERE、RE和瑜伽的效果最为显著。NMA排名显示,AERE是最有效的干预措施,其次是RE、瑜伽、气功、正念和CAE。剂量-反应NMA显示总运动量与BDNF水平呈正非线性剂量-反应关系,确定最佳有效剂量为~610 METs-min/week。超过1000代谢当量任务(METs)-分钟/周,BDNF水平的增加出现平台。此外,每种运动类型具有不同的剂量-反应模式,RE和AERE具有相对较高的最佳有效剂量范围,而CAE,瑜伽,气功和正念具有较低的最佳有效剂量范围。结论:AERE、RE和瑜伽是提高抑郁症患者BDNF水平的有效干预措施,气功、正念和CAE的效果相对较差。在运动量和BDNF水平之间观察到正非线性剂量-反应关系。需要进一步的研究来完善这一人群的剂量-反应关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Depression and Anxiety
Depression and Anxiety 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
1.40%
发文量
81
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Depression and Anxiety is a scientific journal that focuses on the study of mood and anxiety disorders, as well as related phenomena in humans. The journal is dedicated to publishing high-quality research and review articles that contribute to the understanding and treatment of these conditions. The journal places a particular emphasis on articles that contribute to the clinical evaluation and care of individuals affected by mood and anxiety disorders. It prioritizes the publication of treatment-related research and review papers, as well as those that present novel findings that can directly impact clinical practice. The journal's goal is to advance the field by disseminating knowledge that can lead to better diagnosis, treatment, and management of these disorders, ultimately improving the quality of life for those who suffer from them.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信