In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing.

Sevde Gül Batmaz, Zehra Süsgün Yildirim, Zeynep Ceren Çelik, Dilajla Ardiç, Cihan Küden
{"title":"In Vitro Comparison of Surface Characteristics and Bacterial Adhesion in Composite Resin-Based Materials for Additive, Subtractive, and Conventional Manufacturing.","authors":"Sevde Gül Batmaz, Zehra Süsgün Yildirim, Zeynep Ceren Çelik, Dilajla Ardiç, Cihan Küden","doi":"10.11607/ijp.9212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion of resin-based materials used in additive, subtractive, and conventional manufacturing techniques.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study involved four groups of 23 specimens: Indirect conventional resin composite (ICRC), subtractively manufactured resin composite (SMRC), additively manufactured resin composite (AMRC), and soda-lime-silica glass (SLSG). One specimen per group was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) before polishing. Following the polishing procedure, SR, CA, and SFE were measured. The sterilized specimens were divided into two subgroups for Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis adhesion. One randomly selected specimen from each group was also reserved for visualization of bacterial adhesion using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and bacterial adhesion was quantified in the remaining specimens (n=10). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and bacterial adhesion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α = .05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the resin groups, the ICRC group had the lowest SR values (P < .001). The higher CA was observed in the SMRC group than AMRC (P = .016). AMRC displayed significantly lower S. mitis adhesion compared to ICRC and SMRC (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). A positive correlation was found between SR and S.mutans adhesion (R = .455, P < .003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resin materials designed for different manufacturing techniques exhibited diverse surface characteristics. Nevertheless, the 3D printable permanent resin demonstrated comparable S. mutans adhesion to that of ICRC and SMRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94232,"journal":{"name":"The International journal of prosthodontics","volume":"0 0","pages":"1-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International journal of prosthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the surface roughness (SR), contact angle (CA), surface free energy (SFE), and bacterial adhesion of resin-based materials used in additive, subtractive, and conventional manufacturing techniques.

Materials and methods: This study involved four groups of 23 specimens: Indirect conventional resin composite (ICRC), subtractively manufactured resin composite (SMRC), additively manufactured resin composite (AMRC), and soda-lime-silica glass (SLSG). One specimen per group was analyzed by Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) before polishing. Following the polishing procedure, SR, CA, and SFE were measured. The sterilized specimens were divided into two subgroups for Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus mitis adhesion. One randomly selected specimen from each group was also reserved for visualization of bacterial adhesion using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), and bacterial adhesion was quantified in the remaining specimens (n=10). Data for SR, CA, SFE, and bacterial adhesion were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, Tukey post-hoc tests, and Pearson correlation (α = .05).

Results: Among the resin groups, the ICRC group had the lowest SR values (P < .001). The higher CA was observed in the SMRC group than AMRC (P = .016). AMRC displayed significantly lower S. mitis adhesion compared to ICRC and SMRC (P < .001 and P = .003, respectively). A positive correlation was found between SR and S.mutans adhesion (R = .455, P < .003).

Conclusion: Resin materials designed for different manufacturing techniques exhibited diverse surface characteristics. Nevertheless, the 3D printable permanent resin demonstrated comparable S. mutans adhesion to that of ICRC and SMRC.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信