Instruments used by physiotherapists to assess functional capacity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: An online survey

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ana Carolina Otoni Oliveira , Raquel Annoni , Marcia Souza Volpe , Fernando Silva Guimaraes , Camila Ferreira Leite , Flavia Marini Paro , Letícia Marcelino Sotelo Dias , Marilita Falangola Accioly
{"title":"Instruments used by physiotherapists to assess functional capacity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: An online survey","authors":"Ana Carolina Otoni Oliveira ,&nbsp;Raquel Annoni ,&nbsp;Marcia Souza Volpe ,&nbsp;Fernando Silva Guimaraes ,&nbsp;Camila Ferreira Leite ,&nbsp;Flavia Marini Paro ,&nbsp;Letícia Marcelino Sotelo Dias ,&nbsp;Marilita Falangola Accioly","doi":"10.1016/j.hrtlng.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Assessing functional capacity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 may have been neglected due to a great demand for resources at the height of pandemic and the lack of specific assessment instruments for this population. Objectives: To identify the instruments used to evaluate functional capacity in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in COVID-19 wards and ICUs and the associations between use of assessment instruments and physiotherapist characteristics</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The survey was conducted using REDCap web-based application, following the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines. A non-probability recruitment approach aimed at physiotherapists who had treated hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Brazil. The instruments were classified into four domains: muscle strength, mobility, activities of daily living, and physical performance, as for the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, 485 physiotherapists responded to the survey, 81.9% of whom used one or more instruments to assess functional capacity. The Medical Research Council (59.6%) and the Six-Minute Walk Test (21.7%) were the most commonly used instruments in COVID-19 wards; the MRC (63.9%) and the Intensive Care Mobility Scale (33.1%), in ICUs. In COVID-19 wards, higher probability of using assessment instruments was associated with being male, having training on COVID-19 management, and working &gt; 50 h/week. In ICUs, having training on COVID-19 management and working in university hospitals were associated with higher probability of using these instruments</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Most physiotherapists used one or more instruments to assess functional capacity, assessed more than one physical domain, and used the obtained results to plan interventions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55064,"journal":{"name":"Heart & Lung","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 170-176"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart & Lung","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147956324002383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Assessing functional capacity in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 may have been neglected due to a great demand for resources at the height of pandemic and the lack of specific assessment instruments for this population. Objectives: To identify the instruments used to evaluate functional capacity in COVID-19 patients hospitalized in COVID-19 wards and ICUs and the associations between use of assessment instruments and physiotherapist characteristics

Methods

The survey was conducted using REDCap web-based application, following the Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies guidelines. A non-probability recruitment approach aimed at physiotherapists who had treated hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Brazil. The instruments were classified into four domains: muscle strength, mobility, activities of daily living, and physical performance, as for the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health

Results

Overall, 485 physiotherapists responded to the survey, 81.9% of whom used one or more instruments to assess functional capacity. The Medical Research Council (59.6%) and the Six-Minute Walk Test (21.7%) were the most commonly used instruments in COVID-19 wards; the MRC (63.9%) and the Intensive Care Mobility Scale (33.1%), in ICUs. In COVID-19 wards, higher probability of using assessment instruments was associated with being male, having training on COVID-19 management, and working > 50 h/week. In ICUs, having training on COVID-19 management and working in university hospitals were associated with higher probability of using these instruments

Conclusions

Most physiotherapists used one or more instruments to assess functional capacity, assessed more than one physical domain, and used the obtained results to plan interventions.
物理治疗师用于评估COVID-19住院患者功能能力的仪器:一项在线调查
背景:由于大流行高峰期对资源的巨大需求以及缺乏针对该人群的具体评估工具,对COVID-19住院患者的功能能力评估可能被忽视。目的:确定用于评估COVID-19病房和icu住院的COVID-19患者功能能力的工具,以及评估工具的使用与物理治疗师特征之间的关系。方法:使用基于网络的REDCap应用程序进行调查,遵循基于共识的调查研究报告清单指南。针对巴西治疗过住院COVID-19患者的物理治疗师的非概率招募方法。根据国际功能、残疾和健康分类,这些工具被分为四个领域:肌肉力量、机动性、日常生活活动和身体表现。结果:总体而言,485名物理治疗师对调查做出了回应,其中81.9%的人使用一种或多种工具来评估功能能力。医学研究理事会(59.6%)和6分钟步行测试(21.7%)是COVID-19病房最常用的仪器;重症监护病房MRC(63.9%)和重症监护活动量表(33.1%)。在COVID-19病房,使用评估工具的可能性较高,与男性、接受过COVID-19管理培训以及每周工作50小时有关。在icu中,接受过COVID-19管理培训和在大学医院工作的物理治疗师使用这些仪器的可能性更高。结论:大多数物理治疗师使用一种或多种仪器来评估功能能力,评估多个身体领域,并使用获得的结果来计划干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart & Lung
Heart & Lung 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
184
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, the official publication of The American Association of Heart Failure Nurses, presents original, peer-reviewed articles on techniques, advances, investigations, and observations related to the care of patients with acute and critical illness and patients with chronic cardiac or pulmonary disorders. The Journal''s acute care articles focus on the care of hospitalized patients, including those in the critical and acute care settings. Because most patients who are hospitalized in acute and critical care settings have chronic conditions, we are also interested in the chronically critically ill, the care of patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders, their rehabilitation, and disease prevention. The Journal''s heart failure articles focus on all aspects of the care of patients with this condition. Manuscripts that are relevant to populations across the human lifespan are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信