Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder combined subtype and Anti-Yo antibodies.

IF 1 Q3 PEDIATRICS
Renato Donfrancesco, Paola Nativio, Maria G Melegari, Wanda Chiarilli, Rosa M Lacerenza, Matteo Villanova
{"title":"Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder combined subtype and Anti-Yo antibodies.","authors":"Renato Donfrancesco, Paola Nativio, Maria G Melegari, Wanda Chiarilli, Rosa M Lacerenza, Matteo Villanova","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07599-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuroinflammation seems to be involved in ADHD pathogenesis. Recently, in this regard, some evidence suggests the possibility of an autoimmune mechanism related to anti-Purkinje cell antibodies. The aim of this paper is to confirm this evidence searching for a possible specificity for some subtype of ADHD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We studied 112 consecutive drug-naïve Caucasian ADHD outpatients, who were attending their first psychiatric examination (91 males and 21 females; median age =108.14 months; sd=34.58 months). K-SADS interview and ADHD rating scale were used for a DSM 5 diagnosis of ADHD and subtype. WISCIII and a validated list of words were used to assess a possible dyslexia. Antibodies to Yo (Purkinje cell cytoplasmic antibody type 1 [PCA-1]) were detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-nine point one percent (55) of ADHD children were positive to Anti-Yo antibodies. A lower percentage than in previous studies. We found that in the Anti-Yo positive children, the subtype most represented was significantly the combined subtype. No significant relation was found with ADHD plus Dyslexia children.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of ADHD subjects positive to Anti-Yo antibodies is less than in previous studies, but it remains interesting and it is more likely to find a positive child in the combined ADHD than in the other subtypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":56337,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5276.24.07599-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuroinflammation seems to be involved in ADHD pathogenesis. Recently, in this regard, some evidence suggests the possibility of an autoimmune mechanism related to anti-Purkinje cell antibodies. The aim of this paper is to confirm this evidence searching for a possible specificity for some subtype of ADHD.

Methods: We studied 112 consecutive drug-naïve Caucasian ADHD outpatients, who were attending their first psychiatric examination (91 males and 21 females; median age =108.14 months; sd=34.58 months). K-SADS interview and ADHD rating scale were used for a DSM 5 diagnosis of ADHD and subtype. WISCIII and a validated list of words were used to assess a possible dyslexia. Antibodies to Yo (Purkinje cell cytoplasmic antibody type 1 [PCA-1]) were detected by indirect immunofluorescence assay.

Results: Forty-nine point one percent (55) of ADHD children were positive to Anti-Yo antibodies. A lower percentage than in previous studies. We found that in the Anti-Yo positive children, the subtype most represented was significantly the combined subtype. No significant relation was found with ADHD plus Dyslexia children.

Conclusions: The number of ADHD subjects positive to Anti-Yo antibodies is less than in previous studies, but it remains interesting and it is more likely to find a positive child in the combined ADHD than in the other subtypes.

注意缺陷多动障碍合并亚型和抗- yo抗体。
背景:神经炎症似乎与ADHD的发病有关。最近,在这方面,一些证据表明可能存在与抗浦肯野细胞抗体相关的自身免疫机制。本文的目的是证实这一证据,寻找ADHD某些亚型的可能特异性。方法:我们研究了112例连续的drug-naïve高加索ADHD门诊患者,他们首次参加精神病学检查(男性91例,女性21例;中位年龄=108.14个月;sd = 34.58个月)。采用K-SADS访谈和ADHD评定量表对ADHD及其亚型进行DSM - 5诊断。WISCIII和一个有效的单词列表被用来评估可能的阅读障碍。采用间接免疫荧光法检测Yo(浦肯野细胞质抗体1型[PCA-1])抗体。结果:51.1% (55)ADHD患儿抗- yo抗体阳性。这一比例低于之前的研究。我们发现,在抗- yo阳性儿童中,最具代表性的亚型明显是联合亚型。与ADHD合并阅读障碍儿童无显著关系。结论:与之前的研究相比,Anti-Yo抗体阳性的ADHD受试者数量较少,但它仍然很有趣,与其他亚型相比,在合并型ADHD中发现阳性儿童的可能性更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
294
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信