Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1791212
Lisa S Davidson, Ann E Geers, Rosalie M Uchanski, Kathryn Siu
{"title":"Self-reported Hearing Quality of Life for Adolescent Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Longitudinal Study.","authors":"Lisa S Davidson, Ann E Geers, Rosalie M Uchanski, Kathryn Siu","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1791212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Clinicians are increasingly interested in self-reported hearing-specific quality of life (HQoL) for cochlear implant (CI) recipients, including pediatric CI recipients.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong> (1) To compare HQoL of adolescent CI recipients to those of peers with typical hearing (TH); (2) to examine, longitudinally, HQoL for a set of CI recipients; and (3) to determine the effects of child, demographic, audiological, speech perception, and language variables on adolescent HQoL.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong> Hearing Environments and Reflections on Quality of Life (HEARQL) questionnaires were completed by children with CIs at elementary (HEARQL-26) and adolescent (HEARQL-28) ages.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong> Eighty CI recipients and 21 children with TH.</p><p><strong>Data collection and analysis: </strong> HEARQL-28 scores for the CI and TH groups were compared using nonparametric tests. Regression models were used to examine longitudinal results and to explore predictor variables for adolescent CI participants' HEARQL-28 scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> HEARQL-28 scores for CI participants were lower than those of peers with TH. For both CI and TH adolescents, the HEARQL subscale with the lowest score is \"Hearing Situations.\" CI participants' HEARQL scores at elementary age were not significantly correlated with scores at adolescence. Over 70% of unexplained variance remains even after inclusion of variables with established contributions to traditional CI benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong> Self-reported HEARQL scores are largely unexplained for pediatric CI recipients; multidisciplinary explorations of other sources of variance, such as social, emotional, and psychosocial factors, should be pursued.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"178-184"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1791212","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Clinicians are increasingly interested in self-reported hearing-specific quality of life (HQoL) for cochlear implant (CI) recipients, including pediatric CI recipients.

Purpose:  (1) To compare HQoL of adolescent CI recipients to those of peers with typical hearing (TH); (2) to examine, longitudinally, HQoL for a set of CI recipients; and (3) to determine the effects of child, demographic, audiological, speech perception, and language variables on adolescent HQoL.

Research design:  Hearing Environments and Reflections on Quality of Life (HEARQL) questionnaires were completed by children with CIs at elementary (HEARQL-26) and adolescent (HEARQL-28) ages.

Study sample:  Eighty CI recipients and 21 children with TH.

Data collection and analysis:  HEARQL-28 scores for the CI and TH groups were compared using nonparametric tests. Regression models were used to examine longitudinal results and to explore predictor variables for adolescent CI participants' HEARQL-28 scores.

Results:  HEARQL-28 scores for CI participants were lower than those of peers with TH. For both CI and TH adolescents, the HEARQL subscale with the lowest score is "Hearing Situations." CI participants' HEARQL scores at elementary age were not significantly correlated with scores at adolescence. Over 70% of unexplained variance remains even after inclusion of variables with established contributions to traditional CI benefit.

Conclusions:  Self-reported HEARQL scores are largely unexplained for pediatric CI recipients; multidisciplinary explorations of other sources of variance, such as social, emotional, and psychosocial factors, should be pursued.

青少年人工耳蜗受者自我报告的听力生活质量:一项纵向研究。
背景:临床医生对包括儿童人工耳蜗受者在内的人工耳蜗受者自我报告的听力特异性生活质量(HQoL)越来越感兴趣。目的:(1)比较青少年CI受者与听力正常(TH)的HQoL;(2)纵向检查一组CI接受者的HQoL;(3)确定儿童、人口统计学、听力学、言语感知和语言变量对青少年HQoL的影响。研究设计:对小学(HEARQL-26)和青少年(HEARQL-28)年龄的CIs儿童进行听力环境和生活质量反思(HEARQL)问卷调查。研究样本:80例CI患者和21例TH患儿。资料收集和分析:采用非参数检验比较CI组和TH组的HEARQL-28评分。回归模型用于检验纵向结果,并探索青少年CI参与者的HEARQL-28评分的预测变量。结果:CI患者的HEARQL-28评分低于TH患者。对于CI和TH青少年,最低分数的HEARQL子量表是“听力状况”。CI参与者在小学阶段的HEARQL评分与青春期的评分无显著相关。即使在纳入对传统CI收益有既定贡献的变量后,仍有超过70%的无法解释的方差存在。结论:儿童CI受者自我报告的HEARQL评分在很大程度上无法解释;应该追求对其他变异来源的多学科探索,如社会、情感和心理社会因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信