Safety and efficacy of staged primary coiling followed by delayed flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
A Alayli, M Monsour, S Schimmel, E Pressman, F Klocksieben, M Mokin, W R Guerrero, K Vakharia
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of staged primary coiling followed by delayed flow diversion of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"A Alayli, M Monsour, S Schimmel, E Pressman, F Klocksieben, M Mokin, W R Guerrero, K Vakharia","doi":"10.1177/15910199241305426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ruptured intracranial aneurysms lead to significant mortality and morbidity. Recent advancements have suggested staged coiling with subsequent flow diverter stent placement may reduce the risk of hemorrhage with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or stent thrombosis in the acute inflammatory phase after aneurysm rupture while still appropriately mitigating risk of aneurysmal rehemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis was conducted. Studies reporting patients receiving coiling followed by delayed flow diverter placement on a separate day were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five studies, comprising 94 patients, were included for meta-analysis. Average time between procedures ranged from 9.8 to 169 days; 24% (95% CI: 10-41%) of patients had a poor functional neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale > 2) at discharge compared to 4% (0-11%) at last follow-up. There was one incidence of rehemorrhage between treatments, 0% (0-4%). Vasospasm after coiling was the most common adverse event, 16% (1-41%). There was low risk of ischemic complications [1% (0-8%) with coil placement and 5% (1-11%) with stent placement]. Intraprocedural intracranial hemorrhage was also rare (two patients during coil placement; no cases during stent placement). There were no significant differences if flow diversion was performed less than or greater than 100 days from coiling.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study highlights the benefit of primary coiling with staged flow diversion for the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with a low risk for complications. Namely, the rate of rebleeding between treatments was exceptionally low. We advocate for the greater consideration of this treatment combination in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241305426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662348/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241305426","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ruptured intracranial aneurysms lead to significant mortality and morbidity. Recent advancements have suggested staged coiling with subsequent flow diverter stent placement may reduce the risk of hemorrhage with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) or stent thrombosis in the acute inflammatory phase after aneurysm rupture while still appropriately mitigating risk of aneurysmal rehemorrhage.

Materials and methods: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis was conducted. Studies reporting patients receiving coiling followed by delayed flow diverter placement on a separate day were included.

Results: Five studies, comprising 94 patients, were included for meta-analysis. Average time between procedures ranged from 9.8 to 169 days; 24% (95% CI: 10-41%) of patients had a poor functional neurologic outcome (modified Rankin Scale > 2) at discharge compared to 4% (0-11%) at last follow-up. There was one incidence of rehemorrhage between treatments, 0% (0-4%). Vasospasm after coiling was the most common adverse event, 16% (1-41%). There was low risk of ischemic complications [1% (0-8%) with coil placement and 5% (1-11%) with stent placement]. Intraprocedural intracranial hemorrhage was also rare (two patients during coil placement; no cases during stent placement). There were no significant differences if flow diversion was performed less than or greater than 100 days from coiling.

Conclusions: Our study highlights the benefit of primary coiling with staged flow diversion for the management of ruptured intracranial aneurysms with a low risk for complications. Namely, the rate of rebleeding between treatments was exceptionally low. We advocate for the greater consideration of this treatment combination in the treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

颅内动脉瘤破裂后,分阶段进行初次栓塞后延迟分流的安全性和有效性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:颅内动脉瘤破裂导致严重的死亡率和发病率。最近的进展表明,分阶段卷取并随后放置分流支架可以降低双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)出血的风险或动脉瘤破裂后急性炎症期支架血栓形成的风险,同时仍可适当降低动脉瘤再出血的风险。材料和方法:进行了系统综述和单臂荟萃分析。研究报告患者接受盘绕后延迟分流器放置在单独的一天。结果:包括94例患者的5项研究被纳入meta分析。两次手术之间的平均间隔时间为9.8至169天;24% (95% CI: 10-41%)的患者出院时神经功能预后差(改良Rankin量表>2),而最后随访时为4%(0-11%)。两组再出血发生率为0%(0-4%)。血管痉挛是最常见的不良事件,占16%(1-41%)。缺血性并发症的风险较低[置入线圈组为1%(0-8%),置入支架组为5%(1-11%)]。术中颅内出血也很少见(线圈置入时2例;支架置入期间无病例)。如果在卷绕后少于或大于100天进行分流,则没有显着差异。结论:我们的研究强调了初级卷取分阶段分流术治疗颅内动脉瘤破裂的优势,且并发症风险低。也就是说,两次治疗之间的再出血率非常低。我们提倡在颅内动脉瘤破裂的治疗中更多地考虑这种治疗组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信