Increased Salt Sensitive Blood Pressure in Women Versus men: Is Relative Hyperaldosteronism the Mechanism?

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Ezgi Caliskan Guzelce, Kelly Yin Han Wong, Mahyar Heydarpour, Luminita H Pojoga, Jose Romero, Jonathan S Williams, Gail K Adler, Ellen Seely, Gordon H Williams
{"title":"Increased Salt Sensitive Blood Pressure in Women Versus men: Is Relative Hyperaldosteronism the Mechanism?","authors":"Ezgi Caliskan Guzelce, Kelly Yin Han Wong, Mahyar Heydarpour, Luminita H Pojoga, Jose Romero, Jonathan S Williams, Gail K Adler, Ellen Seely, Gordon H Williams","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Women versus men have more Salt sensitive blood pressure (SSBP) and higher stimulated aldosterone (ALDO) levels, suggesting that their increased SSBP is secondary to a relative hyper-ALDO state. Contrariwise, men versus women have higher sedentary ALDO levels.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Thus, the present project was designed to address the question are women versus men in a relatively hyper-ALDO state?</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>363 women, and 483 men were selected from HyperPATH cohort to assess the potential underlying mechanism for observed sex differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women had greater SSBP, greater ALDO and vasculature response to Ang II, and higher upright ALDO/plasma renin activity, but men on both restricted and liberal salt diets had higher basal levels of supine ALDO, PRA levels, and other ALDO secretagogues. Using 24-hour urine ALDOs to assess overall production, ALDO did not differ by sex regardless of salt intake, except when assessed in subsets. Normotensive women vs men had greater urine ALDO, and women vs men younger than 51 had higher urine ALDO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>1) Lower Ang II responsiveness in Ang II targeted organs was observed in men vs women. 2) Similar 24-hour urine ALDO levels in women and men do not support the concept that relative hyper-ALDO is the mechanism for sex difference in SSBP.The data also suggest that the SSBP in women, in some cases, may be benign since it is secondary to a BP reduction on the restricted salt diet not an increase on the liberal salt diet.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae871","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Women versus men have more Salt sensitive blood pressure (SSBP) and higher stimulated aldosterone (ALDO) levels, suggesting that their increased SSBP is secondary to a relative hyper-ALDO state. Contrariwise, men versus women have higher sedentary ALDO levels.

Objective: Thus, the present project was designed to address the question are women versus men in a relatively hyper-ALDO state?

Methods: 363 women, and 483 men were selected from HyperPATH cohort to assess the potential underlying mechanism for observed sex differences.

Results: Women had greater SSBP, greater ALDO and vasculature response to Ang II, and higher upright ALDO/plasma renin activity, but men on both restricted and liberal salt diets had higher basal levels of supine ALDO, PRA levels, and other ALDO secretagogues. Using 24-hour urine ALDOs to assess overall production, ALDO did not differ by sex regardless of salt intake, except when assessed in subsets. Normotensive women vs men had greater urine ALDO, and women vs men younger than 51 had higher urine ALDO.

Conclusion: 1) Lower Ang II responsiveness in Ang II targeted organs was observed in men vs women. 2) Similar 24-hour urine ALDO levels in women and men do not support the concept that relative hyper-ALDO is the mechanism for sex difference in SSBP.The data also suggest that the SSBP in women, in some cases, may be benign since it is secondary to a BP reduction on the restricted salt diet not an increase on the liberal salt diet.

背景:女性与男性相比,盐敏感血压(SSBP)更高,刺激性醛固酮(ALDO)水平也更高,这表明女性SSBP的升高继发于相对高ALDO状态。相反,男性与女性相比,久坐不动的 ALDO 水平更高:方法:从 HyperPATH 队列中选取了 363 名女性和 483 名男性,以评估观察到的性别差异的潜在内在机制:结果:女性的 SSBP 更大,ALDO 和血管对 Ang II 的反应更大,直立 ALDO/血浆肾素活性更高,但限盐和自由盐饮食的男性的仰卧 ALDO 基础水平、PRA 水平和其他 ALDO 促泌剂水平更高。使用 24 小时尿液 ALDO 评估总体分泌量时,无论盐摄入量多少,ALDO 都没有性别差异,除非是在子集中进行评估。结论:1)观察到男性与女性对 Ang II 靶器官的 Ang II 反应性较低。2)女性和男性的 24 小时尿液 ALDO 水平相似,这并不支持相对高 ALDO 是 SSBP 性别差异的机制这一观点。数据还表明,在某些情况下,女性的 SSBP 可能是良性的,因为它是继限盐饮食后血压降低的结果,而不是继宽盐饮食后血压升高的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信