Community health assessment of needs and continuous empowerment (CHANCE): a quantitative cross-sectional survey targeting primary health care nurses in Lebanon.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Gladys Honein-AbouHaidar, Reem Hoteit, Sarah Chehayeb, Nuhad Dumit, Tamar Avedissian, Bahia Abdallah, Randa Hamadeh
{"title":"Community health assessment of needs and continuous empowerment (CHANCE): a quantitative cross-sectional survey targeting primary health care nurses in Lebanon.","authors":"Gladys Honein-AbouHaidar, Reem Hoteit, Sarah Chehayeb, Nuhad Dumit, Tamar Avedissian, Bahia Abdallah, Randa Hamadeh","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02627-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary Health Care (PHC) is the cornerstone of any healthcare system, with nurses forming the largest workforce involved in care. This study aimed to assess the current use of core competencies among community-based nurses, identify their learning needs, and assess factors associated with training needs within PHC centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was used, targeting community health nurses working within primary healthcare centers. Data were collected using a survey instrument adapted from the Canadian Community Health Nurses' Standards of Practice and informed by a validated tool, then piloted for clarity in the Lebanese context. Data were collected between September and November 2018. Mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency, and percentage data were computed for descriptive purposes. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to identify the factors associated with nurses' training needs clustered within centers. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic GEE regression models that accounted for cluster effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of PHCs that agreed to participate was 206, of which 173 returned completed surveys. Given that we do not have an accurate number of the population of nurses working in those centers, we assumed that there would be two nurses in each PHC. Thus, for a total of 251 surveys completed by nurses, the response rate is estimated to be 61%. Of the 173 surveys, 139 were included in the final analysis after deleting those that were incomplete. Descriptive results showed that nurses were competent in providing continuous care (60.0%), electronic technology use (55.08%), and clinical nursing assessment (54.01%). They reported a need for more training on community health promotion (65.12%), patient-centered care (PCC) (58.30%), and patient self-management of chronic diseases (52.0%). In comparison to nurses working in accredited centers, nurses working in centers in the process of becoming accredited required three times more training to become competent in PCC (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.26-9.31, p = 0.016). Registered nurses required three times less training in PCC than senior/head nurses (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.80, p = 0.016). Education level was statistically significantly associated with most training needs. Nurses with Baccalaureate and Technique Superior degrees needed six times more training (OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 1.81-31.16, p = 0.031) than those with a bachelor's or master's degree in nursing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study provided a baseline assessment for the competencies that nurses reported implementing and those that they requested more training on. Future steps would be to develop interventions to empower nurses with the competencies they requested as priorities and to conduct a post intervention assessment to test the effect of the training on nursing adoption of those skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"23 1","pages":"927"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656780/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02627-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary Health Care (PHC) is the cornerstone of any healthcare system, with nurses forming the largest workforce involved in care. This study aimed to assess the current use of core competencies among community-based nurses, identify their learning needs, and assess factors associated with training needs within PHC centers.

Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was used, targeting community health nurses working within primary healthcare centers. Data were collected using a survey instrument adapted from the Canadian Community Health Nurses' Standards of Practice and informed by a validated tool, then piloted for clarity in the Lebanese context. Data were collected between September and November 2018. Mean, standard deviation (SD), frequency, and percentage data were computed for descriptive purposes. The generalized estimating equation (GEE) was used to identify the factors associated with nurses' training needs clustered within centers. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic GEE regression models that accounted for cluster effects.

Results: The total number of PHCs that agreed to participate was 206, of which 173 returned completed surveys. Given that we do not have an accurate number of the population of nurses working in those centers, we assumed that there would be two nurses in each PHC. Thus, for a total of 251 surveys completed by nurses, the response rate is estimated to be 61%. Of the 173 surveys, 139 were included in the final analysis after deleting those that were incomplete. Descriptive results showed that nurses were competent in providing continuous care (60.0%), electronic technology use (55.08%), and clinical nursing assessment (54.01%). They reported a need for more training on community health promotion (65.12%), patient-centered care (PCC) (58.30%), and patient self-management of chronic diseases (52.0%). In comparison to nurses working in accredited centers, nurses working in centers in the process of becoming accredited required three times more training to become competent in PCC (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.26-9.31, p = 0.016). Registered nurses required three times less training in PCC than senior/head nurses (OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.80, p = 0.016). Education level was statistically significantly associated with most training needs. Nurses with Baccalaureate and Technique Superior degrees needed six times more training (OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 1.81-31.16, p = 0.031) than those with a bachelor's or master's degree in nursing.

Conclusion: This study provided a baseline assessment for the competencies that nurses reported implementing and those that they requested more training on. Future steps would be to develop interventions to empower nurses with the competencies they requested as priorities and to conduct a post intervention assessment to test the effect of the training on nursing adoption of those skills.

社区卫生需求评估和持续赋权(CHANCE):针对黎巴嫩初级卫生保健护士的定量横断面调查。
背景:初级卫生保健(PHC)是任何卫生保健系统的基石,护士构成了参与护理的最大劳动力。本研究旨在评估当前社区护士核心能力的使用情况,确定他们的学习需求,并评估与初级保健中心培训需求相关的因素。方法:采用定量横断面调查设计,以在初级卫生保健中心工作的社区卫生护士为目标。数据收集使用的调查工具改编自《加拿大社区卫生护士执业标准》,并通过一种经过验证的工具提供信息,然后在黎巴嫩情况下进行试点,以明确数据。数据收集于2018年9月至11月。为了描述目的,计算平均值、标准差(SD)、频率和百分比数据。使用广义估计方程(GEE)来确定与中心内护士培训需求相关的因素。比值比(ORs)和95%置信区间(CIs)使用考虑聚类效应的逻辑GEE回归模型进行估计。结果:同意参与的phc总数为206家,其中173家返回完成调查。鉴于我们没有在这些中心工作的护士人数的准确数字,我们假设每个初级保健中心有两名护士。因此,护士共完成了251份调查,估计回复率为61%。在173项调查中,剔除不完整的调查后,139项调查被纳入最终分析。描述性结果显示,护士有能力提供持续护理(60.0%)、电子技术使用(55.08%)和临床护理评估(54.01%)。他们报告需要在社区健康促进(65.12%)、以患者为中心的护理(PCC)(58.30%)和慢性疾病患者自我管理(52.0%)方面进行更多培训。与在认证中心工作的护士相比,在认证中心工作的护士需要三倍以上的培训才能胜任PCC (OR = 3.39, 95% CI: 1.26-9.31, p = 0.016)。注册护士需要的PCC培训比高级护士长/护士长少3倍(OR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.11-0.80, p = 0.016)。教育水平与大多数培训需求在统计上显著相关。具有学士学位和技术高级学位的护士需要的培训是具有护理学士或硕士学位的护士的6倍(OR = 6.07, 95% CI: 1.81 ~ 31.16, p = 0.031)。结论:本研究为护士报告实施的能力和他们要求更多培训的能力提供了基线评估。未来的步骤将是制定干预措施,使护士具备她们所要求的优先能力,并进行干预后评估,以测试培训对护士采用这些技能的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信