{"title":"Predictors of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing bias.","authors":"Katherine E Wislocki, Alyson K Zalta","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnostic overshadowing occurs when healthcare professionals misattribute an individual's presenting symptoms to other features of an individual's clinical presentation. Mental health providers may incorrectly diagnose and treat trauma-exposed individuals due to trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing bias. No research has investigated provider factors associated with this bias. Mental health provider background and training characteristics were examined as predictors of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in a sample of mental health providers (N = 210). Hierarchical regression modeling was used to evaluate predictors related to trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in diagnostic and treatment decision-making. Providers with diagnostic responsibilities in their professional role were significantly less likely to demonstrate bias in some diagnostic and treatment decisions. Older mental health providers and providers with more clients experiencing traumatic stress demonstrated greater bias in some diagnostic responses. Providers with doctoral degrees, compared to all other degree types, demonstrated less bias through some diagnostic and treatment responses. Bias in diagnostic decisions strongly predicted bias in treatment decision-making. Findings suggest that factors related to clinical experience may be important in predicting trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing. Future work should extend this research to understand which factors affect trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"184 ","pages":"104651"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2024.104651","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Diagnostic overshadowing occurs when healthcare professionals misattribute an individual's presenting symptoms to other features of an individual's clinical presentation. Mental health providers may incorrectly diagnose and treat trauma-exposed individuals due to trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing bias. No research has investigated provider factors associated with this bias. Mental health provider background and training characteristics were examined as predictors of trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in a sample of mental health providers (N = 210). Hierarchical regression modeling was used to evaluate predictors related to trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in diagnostic and treatment decision-making. Providers with diagnostic responsibilities in their professional role were significantly less likely to demonstrate bias in some diagnostic and treatment decisions. Older mental health providers and providers with more clients experiencing traumatic stress demonstrated greater bias in some diagnostic responses. Providers with doctoral degrees, compared to all other degree types, demonstrated less bias through some diagnostic and treatment responses. Bias in diagnostic decisions strongly predicted bias in treatment decision-making. Findings suggest that factors related to clinical experience may be important in predicting trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing. Future work should extend this research to understand which factors affect trauma-related diagnostic overshadowing in real-world settings.
期刊介绍:
The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.