A core genome MLST scheme for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato improves insights into the evolutionary history of the species complex.

IF 4.3 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Cell Reports Methods Pub Date : 2025-01-27 Epub Date: 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100935
Sabrina Hepner, Keith A Jolley, Santiago Castillo-Ramirez, Evangelos Mourkas, Alexandra Dangel, Andreas Wieser, Johannes Hübner, Andreas Sing, Volker Fingerle, Gabriele Margos
{"title":"A core genome MLST scheme for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato improves insights into the evolutionary history of the species complex.","authors":"Sabrina Hepner, Keith A Jolley, Santiago Castillo-Ramirez, Evangelos Mourkas, Alexandra Dangel, Andreas Wieser, Johannes Hübner, Andreas Sing, Volker Fingerle, Gabriele Margos","doi":"10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) based on eight genes has become the method of choice for Borrelia typing and is extensively used for population studies. Whole-genome sequencing enables studies to scale up to genomic levels but necessitates extended schemes. We have developed a 639-loci core genome MLST (cgMLST) scheme for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) that enables unambiguous genotyping and improves the robustness of phylogenies and lineage resolution within species. Notably, all inner nodes of the cgMLST phylogenies had consistently high statistical support. Analyses of the genetically homogeneous European B. bavariensis population support the notion that cgMLST provides high discriminatory power even for closely related isolates. While isolates differed maximally in one MLST locus, there were up to 179 cgMLST loci differences. Thus, the developed cgMLST scheme for B. burgdorferi s.l. resolves lineages at a finer resolution than MLST and improves insights into the evolutionary history of the species complex.</p>","PeriodicalId":29773,"journal":{"name":"Cell Reports Methods","volume":" ","pages":"100935"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11840949/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Reports Methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) based on eight genes has become the method of choice for Borrelia typing and is extensively used for population studies. Whole-genome sequencing enables studies to scale up to genomic levels but necessitates extended schemes. We have developed a 639-loci core genome MLST (cgMLST) scheme for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.) that enables unambiguous genotyping and improves the robustness of phylogenies and lineage resolution within species. Notably, all inner nodes of the cgMLST phylogenies had consistently high statistical support. Analyses of the genetically homogeneous European B. bavariensis population support the notion that cgMLST provides high discriminatory power even for closely related isolates. While isolates differed maximally in one MLST locus, there were up to 179 cgMLST loci differences. Thus, the developed cgMLST scheme for B. burgdorferi s.l. resolves lineages at a finer resolution than MLST and improves insights into the evolutionary history of the species complex.

针对普通包柔氏包虫病的核心基因组多基因组测序技术(MLST)方案有助于深入了解该物种复合体的进化历史。
基于8个基因的多位点序列分型(MLST)已成为伯氏疏螺旋体分型的首选方法,在种群研究中得到广泛应用。全基因组测序使研究能够扩大到基因组水平,但需要扩展计划。我们开发了一种639个位点的伯氏疏螺旋体核心基因组MLST (cgMLST)方案,可以实现明确的基因分型,并提高物种内系统发育和谱系分辨率的稳健性。值得注意的是,cgMLST系统发生的所有内部节点都具有一致的高统计支持度。对遗传同质化的欧洲巴伐利亚芽孢杆菌种群的分析支持这样一种观点,即cgMLST即使对近亲分离株也具有很高的歧视性。虽然分离株在1个MLST位点上差异最大,但在179个cgMLST位点上存在差异。因此,开发的伯氏疏螺旋体的cgMLST方案以比MLST更精细的分辨率解决了谱系问题,并提高了对物种复杂进化史的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cell Reports Methods
Cell Reports Methods Chemistry (General), Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (General), Immunology and Microbiology (General)
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
111 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信