Exploring urban scenarios of individual residential waste sorting using a spatially explicit agent-based model

IF 7.1 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jonathan Cohen, Jorge Gil, Leonardo Rosado
{"title":"Exploring urban scenarios of individual residential waste sorting using a spatially explicit agent-based model","authors":"Jonathan Cohen,&nbsp;Jorge Gil,&nbsp;Leonardo Rosado","doi":"10.1016/j.wasman.2024.12.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Managing the diverse waste fractions generated by households presents a significant environmental and logistical challenge. One widely adopted solution is waste sorting at the source, where residents are required to separate their waste into designated containers. The success of this strategy depends on the extent of adoption and the behaviour of residents. Waste separation is a complex activity influenced by various interrelated factors. While the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has been effectively applied to characterise waste-sorting behaviour, it primarily focuses on internal psychological mechanisms, often overlooking environmental factors such as the placement of waste bins or the condition of sorting stations—critical elements for spatial planning. To bridge this gap, this study presents an agent-based model (ABM) that simulates residential waste sorting in urban scenarios, incorporating TPB for the agents’ behavioural architecture (residents). Three features distinguish this ABM from previous efforts: (i) Agents in the model are residents and not aggregated households, allowing for a one-to-one integration with TPB; (ii) the ABM bridges the gap between individual waste sorting behaviour extracted by TPB and outcomes quantifiable through waste sorting metrics; and (iii) the ABM is spatially explicit, enabling the exploration of various urban scenarios.</div><div>The ABM was applied to two urban areas with differing population densities, demonstrating that changes in bin placement impacts sorting behaviour, and proximity to recyclable waste bins influences the correct sorting of residual waste. This study illustrates how modelling the interaction between the urban environment and waste sorting behaviour can reveal the impact of individual residents’ actions on overall waste sorting performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23969,"journal":{"name":"Waste management","volume":"193 ","pages":"Pages 350-362"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956053X24006536","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing the diverse waste fractions generated by households presents a significant environmental and logistical challenge. One widely adopted solution is waste sorting at the source, where residents are required to separate their waste into designated containers. The success of this strategy depends on the extent of adoption and the behaviour of residents. Waste separation is a complex activity influenced by various interrelated factors. While the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) has been effectively applied to characterise waste-sorting behaviour, it primarily focuses on internal psychological mechanisms, often overlooking environmental factors such as the placement of waste bins or the condition of sorting stations—critical elements for spatial planning. To bridge this gap, this study presents an agent-based model (ABM) that simulates residential waste sorting in urban scenarios, incorporating TPB for the agents’ behavioural architecture (residents). Three features distinguish this ABM from previous efforts: (i) Agents in the model are residents and not aggregated households, allowing for a one-to-one integration with TPB; (ii) the ABM bridges the gap between individual waste sorting behaviour extracted by TPB and outcomes quantifiable through waste sorting metrics; and (iii) the ABM is spatially explicit, enabling the exploration of various urban scenarios.
The ABM was applied to two urban areas with differing population densities, demonstrating that changes in bin placement impacts sorting behaviour, and proximity to recyclable waste bins influences the correct sorting of residual waste. This study illustrates how modelling the interaction between the urban environment and waste sorting behaviour can reveal the impact of individual residents’ actions on overall waste sorting performance.
利用空间显式主体模型探索个人生活垃圾分类的城市场景。
管理家庭产生的各种废物馏分是一项重大的环境和后勤挑战。一种被广泛采用的解决方案是在源头进行垃圾分类,要求居民将垃圾分类到指定的容器中。这一战略的成功取决于采用的程度和居民的行为。垃圾分类是一项复杂的活动,受到各种相互关联的因素的影响。虽然计划行为理论(TPB)已被有效地应用于描述垃圾分类行为,但它主要关注内部心理机制,往往忽略了环境因素,如垃圾箱的放置或分拣站的条件,而这些因素是空间规划的关键因素。为了弥补这一差距,本研究提出了一个基于主体的模型(ABM),该模型模拟了城市场景下的生活垃圾分类,并将TPB纳入主体(居民)的行为架构中。该ABM与以往的研究有三个不同之处:(i)模型中的代理人是居民,而不是聚集的家庭,允许与城市规划局进行一对一的整合;(ii)废物分类标准弥补了城规会收集的个人废物分类行为与废物分类指标可量化的结果之间的差距;(iii) ABM在空间上是明确的,可以探索不同的城市场景。ABM应用于两个人口密度不同的城市地区,表明垃圾箱放置位置的变化会影响分类行为,靠近可回收垃圾箱会影响剩余废物的正确分类。本研究说明了如何建立城市环境与垃圾分类行为之间相互作用的模型,从而揭示居民个人行为对整体垃圾分类绩效的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Waste management
Waste management 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
492
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Waste Management is devoted to the presentation and discussion of information on solid wastes,it covers the entire lifecycle of solid. wastes. Scope: Addresses solid wastes in both industrialized and economically developing countries Covers various types of solid wastes, including: Municipal (e.g., residential, institutional, commercial, light industrial) Agricultural Special (e.g., C and D, healthcare, household hazardous wastes, sewage sludge)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信