{"title":"EXPRESS: An Exploration of Relationships between Associative and Non-Associative Measures of Inhibition.","authors":"Ovidiu Brudan, Hedwig Eisenbarth, Steven Glautier","doi":"10.1177/17470218241310859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Conditioned inhibition and occasion setting are two examples of inhibitory associative phenomena that have traditionally been studied in isolation from non-associative inhibition. Non-associative inhibition has been assessed using a variety of measures (e.g. stop signal reaction time and impulsivity questionnaires) and weak non-associative inhibition has been linked to a variety of disorders including addiction. However, even though both associative and non-associative inhibition have a common core -both involve suppression of behaviour, there has been relatively little study of potential relationships between these different forms of inhibition. In the current investigation we carried out exploratory analyses to look for possible links between conditioned inhibition and occasion setting and four non-associative measures of inhibition namely, 1) stop signal reaction time, 2) delay discounting, and scores on 3) the Behaviour Inhibition System/Behaviour Activation System (Carver & White, 1994) and 4) Barratt Impulsivity (Patton et al., 1995) questionnaires. Despite the fact that we carefully selected data to minimise noise in the measurement of associative inhibition we found no clear evidence of links between associative and non-associative inhibition. We therefore conclude that whilst there may be superficial similarities between these different forms of inhibition they are likely to have different substrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"17470218241310859"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218241310859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Conditioned inhibition and occasion setting are two examples of inhibitory associative phenomena that have traditionally been studied in isolation from non-associative inhibition. Non-associative inhibition has been assessed using a variety of measures (e.g. stop signal reaction time and impulsivity questionnaires) and weak non-associative inhibition has been linked to a variety of disorders including addiction. However, even though both associative and non-associative inhibition have a common core -both involve suppression of behaviour, there has been relatively little study of potential relationships between these different forms of inhibition. In the current investigation we carried out exploratory analyses to look for possible links between conditioned inhibition and occasion setting and four non-associative measures of inhibition namely, 1) stop signal reaction time, 2) delay discounting, and scores on 3) the Behaviour Inhibition System/Behaviour Activation System (Carver & White, 1994) and 4) Barratt Impulsivity (Patton et al., 1995) questionnaires. Despite the fact that we carefully selected data to minimise noise in the measurement of associative inhibition we found no clear evidence of links between associative and non-associative inhibition. We therefore conclude that whilst there may be superficial similarities between these different forms of inhibition they are likely to have different substrates.
期刊介绍:
Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling.
QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form.
The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.