Barriers to clinical follow-up visits in multiple sclerosis: A nationwide register-based study.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Agata Beczek, Eskild Morten Landt, Lars Kristian Storr, Malene Beck, Luigi Pontieri, Melinda Magyari, Morten Dahl
{"title":"Barriers to clinical follow-up visits in multiple sclerosis: A nationwide register-based study.","authors":"Agata Beczek, Eskild Morten Landt, Lars Kristian Storr, Malene Beck, Luigi Pontieri, Melinda Magyari, Morten Dahl","doi":"10.1177/20552173241307619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Denmark, specialized multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics offer free-of-charge treatment to people with MS. However, not all people with MS attend regular clinical follow-up.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify people with MS who do not attend Danish MS clinics and identify barriers to treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry was linked to other national Danish registries with follow-up from 2000-2020. We used a time-dependent Cox regression to rank factors associated with low attendance to clinical follow-up visits based on the magnitude of hazard ratios (HRs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10,175 adults with MS, of which 3862 (38%) had less than one visit annually. The five top-ranked factors that reduced the risk of visits occurring included never having received diseases modifying treatment (HR: 0.48; 95%CI: 0.46-0.49), been diagnosed with MS before 2009 (0.79; 0.78-0.81), association with MS center in an outer region of Denmark (0.82; 0.80-0.84), having progressive MS type (0.88; 0.86-0.91) and not having received symptomatic treatment at diagnosis (0.91; 0.89-0.93).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results highlight disease-specific and geographic inequalities in the management of people with MS in Denmark. Strategies to prevent this inequality, especially for people with progressive phenotypes and those who need supportive and non-medical treatment and care, should be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":18961,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","volume":"10 4","pages":"20552173241307619"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656436/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552173241307619","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Denmark, specialized multiple sclerosis (MS) clinics offer free-of-charge treatment to people with MS. However, not all people with MS attend regular clinical follow-up.

Objective: To identify people with MS who do not attend Danish MS clinics and identify barriers to treatment.

Methods: The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry was linked to other national Danish registries with follow-up from 2000-2020. We used a time-dependent Cox regression to rank factors associated with low attendance to clinical follow-up visits based on the magnitude of hazard ratios (HRs).

Results: We included 10,175 adults with MS, of which 3862 (38%) had less than one visit annually. The five top-ranked factors that reduced the risk of visits occurring included never having received diseases modifying treatment (HR: 0.48; 95%CI: 0.46-0.49), been diagnosed with MS before 2009 (0.79; 0.78-0.81), association with MS center in an outer region of Denmark (0.82; 0.80-0.84), having progressive MS type (0.88; 0.86-0.91) and not having received symptomatic treatment at diagnosis (0.91; 0.89-0.93).

Conclusion: Our results highlight disease-specific and geographic inequalities in the management of people with MS in Denmark. Strategies to prevent this inequality, especially for people with progressive phenotypes and those who need supportive and non-medical treatment and care, should be implemented.

多发性硬化症临床随访的障碍:一项全国性的基于登记的研究。
背景:在丹麦,专门的多发性硬化症(MS)诊所为MS患者提供免费治疗。然而,并非所有MS患者都参加定期的临床随访。目的:确定不去丹麦多发性硬化症诊所就诊的多发性硬化症患者,并确定治疗障碍。方法:从2000年到2020年,将丹麦多发性硬化症登记处与其他丹麦国家登记处联系起来。我们使用时间相关的Cox回归,根据风险比(hr)的大小对与临床随访率低相关的因素进行排序。结果:我们纳入了10,175名成年MS患者,其中3862人(38%)每年就诊少于一次。降低就诊风险的前5个因素包括从未接受过疾病改良治疗(HR: 0.48;95%CI: 0.46-0.49), 2009年前被诊断为多发性硬化症(0.79;0.78-0.81),与丹麦外围地区的多发性硬化症中心相关(0.82;0.80-0.84),为进行性MS型(0.88;0.86-0.91),诊断时未接受对症治疗(0.91;0.89 - -0.93)。结论:我们的研究结果突出了丹麦多发性硬化症患者管理中的疾病特异性和地理不平等。应当实施防止这种不平等现象的战略,特别是针对进行性表型的人以及需要支持性和非医疗治疗和护理的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信