Catheter ablation in rate-controlled atrial fibrillation with severely reduced ejection fraction: intervention for irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy.
Samuel D Maidman, Anthony Aizer, Lior Jankelson, Douglas Holmes, David S Park, Scott A Bernstein, Robert Knotts, Alex Kushnir, Larry A Chinitz, Chirag R Barbhaiya
{"title":"Catheter ablation in rate-controlled atrial fibrillation with severely reduced ejection fraction: intervention for irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy.","authors":"Samuel D Maidman, Anthony Aizer, Lior Jankelson, Douglas Holmes, David S Park, Scott A Bernstein, Robert Knotts, Alex Kushnir, Larry A Chinitz, Chirag R Barbhaiya","doi":"10.1007/s10840-024-01965-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence suggests atrial fibrillation (AF) causes cardiomyopathy due to remodeling driven by both irregular rate and rhythm. Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% has been shown to improve EF and mortality. It is unknown whether the benefits of AF ablation among patients with reduced EF are affected by the degree of pre-ablation rate control.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate AF ablation echocardiographic outcomes for patients who have EF ≤ 35% with varying degrees of pre-ablation rate control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-center, retrospective study of patients with EF ≤ 35% undergoing first-time ablation of persistent AF. Primary analyses evaluated the degree to which pre-ablation rate control impacted echocardiographic outcomes. Rates of EF recovery to > 35% were compared at three different cutoffs: 110 bpm, 90 bpm, and 70 bpm. A linear regression analysis was then performed to evaluate whether baseline heart rate (HR) predicted change in EF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 73 patients, the mean pre-ablation resting HR was 90 ± 25 bpm, and baseline EF was 27 ± 7%. Patients experienced significant improvements in EF by mean + 14% ± 11% (p < 0.001). Post-ablation EF recovery occurred in 60% of patients. No differences in EF improvement were detected at HR control targets of ≤ 110 bpm or ≤ 90 bpm, while patients achieving HR ≤ 70 bpm had less improvement in EF (+ 9% ± 9%) compared to those with HR above the cutoff (+ 16% ± 11%; p = 0.01). Linear regression analysis did not reveal baseline HR as a significant predictor of change in LVEF (slope = 0.09, r<sup>2</sup> = 0.05, p = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Catheter ablation of persistent AF in patients with reduced EF frequently resulted in recovery in EF > 35%, irrespective of pre-ablation achieved rate control. While patients with HR > 70 bpm experienced a greater improvement in EF compared to those ≤ 70 bpm, patients with baseline HR below this target still experienced significant EF improvements. Further investigation into irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":16202,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-024-01965-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent evidence suggests atrial fibrillation (AF) causes cardiomyopathy due to remodeling driven by both irregular rate and rhythm. Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% has been shown to improve EF and mortality. It is unknown whether the benefits of AF ablation among patients with reduced EF are affected by the degree of pre-ablation rate control.
Objectives: To evaluate AF ablation echocardiographic outcomes for patients who have EF ≤ 35% with varying degrees of pre-ablation rate control.
Methods: Single-center, retrospective study of patients with EF ≤ 35% undergoing first-time ablation of persistent AF. Primary analyses evaluated the degree to which pre-ablation rate control impacted echocardiographic outcomes. Rates of EF recovery to > 35% were compared at three different cutoffs: 110 bpm, 90 bpm, and 70 bpm. A linear regression analysis was then performed to evaluate whether baseline heart rate (HR) predicted change in EF.
Results: Among 73 patients, the mean pre-ablation resting HR was 90 ± 25 bpm, and baseline EF was 27 ± 7%. Patients experienced significant improvements in EF by mean + 14% ± 11% (p < 0.001). Post-ablation EF recovery occurred in 60% of patients. No differences in EF improvement were detected at HR control targets of ≤ 110 bpm or ≤ 90 bpm, while patients achieving HR ≤ 70 bpm had less improvement in EF (+ 9% ± 9%) compared to those with HR above the cutoff (+ 16% ± 11%; p = 0.01). Linear regression analysis did not reveal baseline HR as a significant predictor of change in LVEF (slope = 0.09, r2 = 0.05, p = 0.07).
Conclusions: Catheter ablation of persistent AF in patients with reduced EF frequently resulted in recovery in EF > 35%, irrespective of pre-ablation achieved rate control. While patients with HR > 70 bpm experienced a greater improvement in EF compared to those ≤ 70 bpm, patients with baseline HR below this target still experienced significant EF improvements. Further investigation into irregularity-mediated cardiomyopathy is warranted.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology is an international publication devoted to fostering research in and development of interventional techniques and therapies for the management of cardiac arrhythmias. It is designed primarily to present original research studies and scholarly scientific reviews of basic and applied science and clinical research in this field. The Journal will adopt a multidisciplinary approach to link physical, experimental, and clinical sciences as applied to the development of and practice in interventional electrophysiology. The Journal will examine techniques ranging from molecular, chemical and pharmacologic therapies to device and ablation technology. Accordingly, original research in clinical, epidemiologic and basic science arenas will be considered for publication. Applied engineering or physical science studies pertaining to interventional electrophysiology will be encouraged. The Journal is committed to providing comprehensive and detailed treatment of major interventional therapies and innovative techniques in a structured and clinically relevant manner. It is directed at clinical practitioners and investigators in the rapidly growing field of interventional electrophysiology. The editorial staff and board reflect this bias and include noted international experts in this area with a wealth of expertise in basic and clinical investigation. Peer review of all submissions, conflict of interest guidelines and periodic editorial board review of all Journal policies have been established.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
