Comparative efficacy and safety of metformin, anti-obesity agents, and myoinositol in improving IVF/ICSI outcomes and reducing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY
Lijun Lin, Ge Chen, Xiaoyong Qiao, Yan Chen, Hongxia Deng, Liangzhi Xu
{"title":"Comparative efficacy and safety of metformin, anti-obesity agents, and myoinositol in improving IVF/ICSI outcomes and reducing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Lijun Lin, Ge Chen, Xiaoyong Qiao, Yan Chen, Hongxia Deng, Liangzhi Xu","doi":"10.1186/s13048-024-01576-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the efficacy and safety of metformin, anti-obesity agents, and inositol with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in English up to October 26, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating metformin, anti-obesity agents, and inositol were included. A network meta-analysis was performed using frequency statistical methods. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols and body mass index(BMI). The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration code CRD42024502823).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>20 RCTs were included with 1,827 patients assessed six different agents. Nineteen trials were rated low risk, with one rated moderate risk. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that metformin did not improve pregnancy outcomes but was associated with a reduced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.83), particularly in agonist protocols, along with lower E2 levels on the trigger day (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI -0.90 to -0.21) and increased side effects (OR = 6.85, 95% CI 4.32-10.86). Network meta-analysis confirmed no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes for these agents compared to controls, though both myoinositol and metformin reduced OHSS risk. Myoinositol was linked to a shorter gonadotropin duration (SMD = -1.21, 95% CI -2.03 to -0.38) and fewer side effects (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.83) compared to controls. Metformin led to lower E2 levels, a higher number of mature oocytes, and increased side effects (SMD = -376.52, 95% CI -610.83 to -142.22; SMD = 2.23, 95% CI 0.36-4.10; OR = 6.85, 95% CI 4.32-10.86) than controls. No studies reported an increased risk of fetal abnormalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Metformin and myoinositol may reduce OHSS risk in PCOS patients but did not significantly improve pregnancy outcomes. Metformin may lower OHSS risk in agonist protocol, reduce E2 levels on trigger day and increase mature oocytes but cause more side effects, while myoinositol may shorten gonadotropin duration with fewer side effects. Further robust RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16610,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ovarian Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"249"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657860/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ovarian Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-024-01576-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of metformin, anti-obesity agents, and inositol with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov for studies published in English up to October 26, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating metformin, anti-obesity agents, and inositol were included. A network meta-analysis was performed using frequency statistical methods. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols and body mass index(BMI). The research protocol was registered with PROSPERO (registration code CRD42024502823).

Results: 20 RCTs were included with 1,827 patients assessed six different agents. Nineteen trials were rated low risk, with one rated moderate risk. Pairwise meta-analysis showed that metformin did not improve pregnancy outcomes but was associated with a reduced ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) risk (OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.83), particularly in agonist protocols, along with lower E2 levels on the trigger day (SMD = -0.56, 95% CI -0.90 to -0.21) and increased side effects (OR = 6.85, 95% CI 4.32-10.86). Network meta-analysis confirmed no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes for these agents compared to controls, though both myoinositol and metformin reduced OHSS risk. Myoinositol was linked to a shorter gonadotropin duration (SMD = -1.21, 95% CI -2.03 to -0.38) and fewer side effects (OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.83) compared to controls. Metformin led to lower E2 levels, a higher number of mature oocytes, and increased side effects (SMD = -376.52, 95% CI -610.83 to -142.22; SMD = 2.23, 95% CI 0.36-4.10; OR = 6.85, 95% CI 4.32-10.86) than controls. No studies reported an increased risk of fetal abnormalities.

Conclusion: Metformin and myoinositol may reduce OHSS risk in PCOS patients but did not significantly improve pregnancy outcomes. Metformin may lower OHSS risk in agonist protocol, reduce E2 levels on trigger day and increase mature oocytes but cause more side effects, while myoinositol may shorten gonadotropin duration with fewer side effects. Further robust RCTs are needed to confirm these findings.

二甲双胍、抗肥胖药和肌醇在改善多囊卵巢综合征妇女 IVF/ICSI 结果和减少卵巢过度刺激综合征方面的疗效和安全性比较:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
目的:比较二甲双胍、抗肥胖药物和肌醇治疗多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)体外受精(IVF)和胞浆内单精子注射(ICSI)的疗效和安全性。方法:综合检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov网站,检索截至2024年10月26日发表的英文研究。随机对照试验(rct)评估二甲双胍、抗肥胖药物和肌醇。采用频率统计方法进行网络meta分析。根据控制性卵巢刺激(COS)方案和体重指数(BMI)进行亚组分析。研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(注册码CRD42024502823)。结果:20项随机对照试验纳入了1827例患者,评估了6种不同的药物。19项试验被评为低风险,1项被评为中度风险。两两荟萃分析显示,二甲双胍不能改善妊娠结局,但与卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)风险降低相关(OR = 0.52, 95% CI 0.33-0.83),特别是在激动剂方案中,以及触发日较低的E2水平(SMD = -0.56, 95% CI -0.90至-0.21)和增加的副作用(OR = 6.85, 95% CI 4.32-10.86)。网络荟萃分析证实,与对照组相比,这些药物在妊娠结局方面没有显著差异,尽管肌醇和二甲双胍都能降低OHSS风险。与对照组相比,肌醇与较短的促性腺激素持续时间(SMD = -1.21, 95% CI -2.03至-0.38)和较少的副作用(OR = 0.23, 95% CI 0.06-0.83)有关。二甲双胍导致E2水平降低,成熟卵母细胞数量增加,副作用增加(SMD = -376.52, 95% CI -610.83 ~ -142.22;Smd = 2.23, 95% ci 0.36-4.10;OR = 6.85, 95% CI 4.32-10.86)。没有研究报告胎儿畸形的风险增加。结论:二甲双胍和肌醇可降低PCOS患者OHSS风险,但对妊娠结局无显著改善。在激动剂方案中,二甲双胍可降低OHSS风险,降低触发日E2水平,增加成熟卵母细胞,但副作用更大,而肌醇可缩短促性腺激素持续时间,副作用更小。需要进一步强有力的随机对照试验来证实这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ovarian Research
Journal of Ovarian Research REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.50%
发文量
125
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Ovarian Research is an open access, peer reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a forum for high-quality basic and clinical research on ovarian function, abnormalities, and cancer. The journal focuses on research that provides new insights into ovarian functions as well as prevention and treatment of diseases afflicting the organ. Topical areas include, but are not restricted to: Ovary development, hormone secretion and regulation Follicle growth and ovulation Infertility and Polycystic ovarian syndrome Regulation of pituitary and other biological functions by ovarian hormones Ovarian cancer, its prevention, diagnosis and treatment Drug development and screening Role of stem cells in ovary development and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信