The Effect of Anterior Colporrhaphy: A Prospective Study Comparing POP-Q and Upright MRI.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Julia J Eijsink, Jaimy A Simmering, Manon Perik, Annemarie van der Steen, Anique T M Grob
{"title":"The Effect of Anterior Colporrhaphy: A Prospective Study Comparing POP-Q and Upright MRI.","authors":"Julia J Eijsink, Jaimy A Simmering, Manon Perik, Annemarie van der Steen, Anique T M Grob","doi":"10.1007/s00192-024-06006-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction and hypothesis: </strong>The high recurrence rate (up to 40%) of native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is concerning and a better understanding of the effect of surgery is essential in optimizing treatment. As physical examination (Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification, POP-Q) underestimates the degree of prolapse, upright assessment may provide new insights. Therefore, we compared supine POP-Q with upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the anatomical effect of native tissue POP surgery on the pelvic anatomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included 59 women with stage ≥ 2 anterior compartment prolapse undergoing solely anterior colporrhaphy (AC) or in combination with posterior colporrhaphy (PC), sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) or Manchester Fothergill (MF). Preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, anatomical measurements were obtained: POP-Q and upright MRI. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire was completed 6 weeks postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant lift of the lowest point of the bladder was observed on both POP-Q (37 ± 18 mm) and upright MRI (26 ± 22 mm), which was 10 ± 17 mm (p < 0.001) larger on POP-Q than on upright MRI. Symptomatic improvement (PGI-I) was reported by 93.2% of the patients, which showed a weak correlation with the bladder lift on upright MRI (Spearman's ρ -0.301, p = 0.021), but no correlation with the bladder lift on POP-Q (Spearman's ρ -0.078, p = 0.565).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The POP-Q examination overestimates the anatomical result of native tissue POP repair on the anterior vaginal wall by 1 cm compared with upright MRI examination upon 6 weeks' follow-up. Upright MRI examination is suggested to relate better to symptomatic outcome than does POP-Q examination.</p>","PeriodicalId":14355,"journal":{"name":"International Urogynecology Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urogynecology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-06006-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis: The high recurrence rate (up to 40%) of native tissue surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is concerning and a better understanding of the effect of surgery is essential in optimizing treatment. As physical examination (Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification, POP-Q) underestimates the degree of prolapse, upright assessment may provide new insights. Therefore, we compared supine POP-Q with upright magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the anatomical effect of native tissue POP surgery on the pelvic anatomy.

Methods: This prospective study included 59 women with stage ≥ 2 anterior compartment prolapse undergoing solely anterior colporrhaphy (AC) or in combination with posterior colporrhaphy (PC), sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH) or Manchester Fothergill (MF). Preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, anatomical measurements were obtained: POP-Q and upright MRI. The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) questionnaire was completed 6 weeks postoperatively.

Results: Significant lift of the lowest point of the bladder was observed on both POP-Q (37 ± 18 mm) and upright MRI (26 ± 22 mm), which was 10 ± 17 mm (p < 0.001) larger on POP-Q than on upright MRI. Symptomatic improvement (PGI-I) was reported by 93.2% of the patients, which showed a weak correlation with the bladder lift on upright MRI (Spearman's ρ -0.301, p = 0.021), but no correlation with the bladder lift on POP-Q (Spearman's ρ -0.078, p = 0.565).

Conclusions: The POP-Q examination overestimates the anatomical result of native tissue POP repair on the anterior vaginal wall by 1 cm compared with upright MRI examination upon 6 weeks' follow-up. Upright MRI examination is suggested to relate better to symptomatic outcome than does POP-Q examination.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
406
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Urogynecology Journal is the official journal of the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA).The International Urogynecology Journal has evolved in response to a perceived need amongst the clinicians, scientists, and researchers active in the field of urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologists, urologists, physiotherapists, nurses and basic scientists require regular means of communication within this field of pelvic floor dysfunction to express new ideas and research, and to review clinical practice in the diagnosis and treatment of women with disorders of the pelvic floor. This Journal has adopted the peer review process for all original contributions and will maintain high standards with regard to the research published therein. The clinical approach to urogynecology and pelvic floor disorders will be emphasized with each issue containing clinically relevant material that will be immediately applicable for clinical medicine. This publication covers all aspects of the field in an interdisciplinary fashion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信