Four functional genotoxic marker genes (Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, and Cdkn1a) discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens and non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogens in rat public toxicogenomics data, Open TG-GATEs.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Chie Furihata, Takayoshi Suzuki
{"title":"Four functional genotoxic marker genes (Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, and Cdkn1a) discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens and non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogens in rat public toxicogenomics data, Open TG-GATEs.","authors":"Chie Furihata, Takayoshi Suzuki","doi":"10.1186/s41021-024-00322-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previously, Japanese Environmental Mutagen and Genome Society/Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group/Toxicogenomics Study Group (JEMS/MMS toxicogenomic study group) proposed 12 genotoxic marker genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Gdf15, Lrp1, Mbd1, Phlda3, Plk2, and Tubb4b) to discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (GTHCs) from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGTHCs) and non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogens (NGTNHCs) in mouse and rat liver using qPCR and RNA-Seq and confirmed in public rat toxicogenomics data, Open TG-GATEs, by principal component analysis (PCA). On the other hand, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) suggested seven genotoxic marker genes (Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, Cgrrf1, Cdkn1a, Mgmt, and Tmem47) with Open TG-GATEs data. Four genes (Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, and Cdkn1a) were common in these two studies. In the present study, we examined the performance of these four genes in Open TG-GATEs data using PCA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study's findings are of paramount significance, as these four genes proved to be highly effective in distinguishing five typical GTHCs (2-acetylaminofluorene, aflatoxin B1, 2-nitrofluorene, N-nitrosodiethylamine and N-nitrosomorpholine) from seven typical NGTHCs (clofibrate, ethanol, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, hexachlorobenzene, phenobarbital, and WY-14643) and 11 NGTNHCs (allyl alcohol, aspirin, caffeine, chlorpheniramine, chlorpropamide, dexamethasone, diazepam, indomethacin, phenylbutazone, theophylline, and tolbutamide) by PCA at 24 h after a single administration with 100% accuracy. These four genes also effectively distinguished two typical GTHCs (2-acetylaminofluorene and N-nitrosodiethylamine) from seven NGTHCs and ten NGTNHCs by PCA on 29 days after 28 days-repeated administrations, with a similar or even better performance compared to the previous 12 genes. Furthermore, the study's analysis revealed that the three intermediate GTHC/NGTHCs (methapyrilene, monocrotaline, and thioacetamide, which were negative in the Salmonella test but positive in the in vivo rat liver test) were located in the intermediate region between typical GTHCs and typical NGTHCs by PCA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present results unequivocally demonstrate the availability of four genotoxic marker genes ((Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, and Cdkn1a) and PCA in discriminating GTHCs from NGTHCs and NGTNHCs in Open TG-GATEs. These findings strongly support our recommendation that future rat liver in vivo toxicogenomics tests prioritize these four genotoxic marker genes, as they have proven to be highly effective in discriminating between different types of hepatocarcinogens.</p>","PeriodicalId":12709,"journal":{"name":"Genes and Environment","volume":"46 1","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genes and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-024-00322-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previously, Japanese Environmental Mutagen and Genome Society/Mammalian Mutagenicity Study Group/Toxicogenomics Study Group (JEMS/MMS toxicogenomic study group) proposed 12 genotoxic marker genes (Aen, Bax, Btg2, Ccnf, Ccng1, Cdkn1a, Gdf15, Lrp1, Mbd1, Phlda3, Plk2, and Tubb4b) to discriminate genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (GTHCs) from non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogens (NGTHCs) and non-genotoxic non-hepatocarcinogens (NGTNHCs) in mouse and rat liver using qPCR and RNA-Seq and confirmed in public rat toxicogenomics data, Open TG-GATEs, by principal component analysis (PCA). On the other hand, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) suggested seven genotoxic marker genes (Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, Cgrrf1, Cdkn1a, Mgmt, and Tmem47) with Open TG-GATEs data. Four genes (Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, and Cdkn1a) were common in these two studies. In the present study, we examined the performance of these four genes in Open TG-GATEs data using PCA.

Results: The study's findings are of paramount significance, as these four genes proved to be highly effective in distinguishing five typical GTHCs (2-acetylaminofluorene, aflatoxin B1, 2-nitrofluorene, N-nitrosodiethylamine and N-nitrosomorpholine) from seven typical NGTHCs (clofibrate, ethanol, fenofibrate, gemfibrozil, hexachlorobenzene, phenobarbital, and WY-14643) and 11 NGTNHCs (allyl alcohol, aspirin, caffeine, chlorpheniramine, chlorpropamide, dexamethasone, diazepam, indomethacin, phenylbutazone, theophylline, and tolbutamide) by PCA at 24 h after a single administration with 100% accuracy. These four genes also effectively distinguished two typical GTHCs (2-acetylaminofluorene and N-nitrosodiethylamine) from seven NGTHCs and ten NGTNHCs by PCA on 29 days after 28 days-repeated administrations, with a similar or even better performance compared to the previous 12 genes. Furthermore, the study's analysis revealed that the three intermediate GTHC/NGTHCs (methapyrilene, monocrotaline, and thioacetamide, which were negative in the Salmonella test but positive in the in vivo rat liver test) were located in the intermediate region between typical GTHCs and typical NGTHCs by PCA.

Conclusions: The present results unequivocally demonstrate the availability of four genotoxic marker genes ((Bax, Btg2, Ccng1, and Cdkn1a) and PCA in discriminating GTHCs from NGTHCs and NGTNHCs in Open TG-GATEs. These findings strongly support our recommendation that future rat liver in vivo toxicogenomics tests prioritize these four genotoxic marker genes, as they have proven to be highly effective in discriminating between different types of hepatocarcinogens.

四个功能性基因毒性标记基因(Bax、Btg2、Ccng1 和 Cdkn1a)可区分大鼠公共毒物基因组学数据 Open TG-GATEs 中的基因毒性肝癌致癌物与非基因毒性肝癌致癌物和非基因毒性非肝癌致癌物。
背景:此前,日本环境诱变与基因组学会/哺乳动物诱变研究小组/毒物基因组学研究小组(JEMS/MMS毒物基因组学研究小组)提出了12个基因毒性标记基因(Aen、Bax、Btg2、Ccnf、Ccng1、Cdkn1a、Gdf15、Lrp1、Mbd1、Phlda3、Plk2、和Tubb4b)利用qPCR和RNA-Seq技术区分小鼠和大鼠肝脏中的基因毒性肝癌物质(GTHCs)、非基因毒性肝癌物质(NGTHCs)和非基因毒性非肝癌物质(ngtnhc),并通过主成分分析(PCA)在公开的大鼠毒物基因组学数据Open TG-GATEs中得到证实。另一方面,美国环境保护署(US EPA)通过Open TG-GATEs数据推荐了7个基因毒性标记基因(Bax、Btg2、Ccng1、Cgrrf1、Cdkn1a、Mgmt和Tmem47)。在这两项研究中,有四个基因(Bax、Btg2、Ccng1和Cdkn1a)是常见的。在本研究中,我们使用PCA检测了这四个基因在Open TG-GATEs数据中的表现。结果:该研究结果具有重要意义,因为这4个基因可有效区分5种典型GTHCs(2-乙酰氨基芴、黄曲霉毒素B1、2-硝基芴、n -亚硝基二乙胺和n -亚硝基somorpholine)与7种典型NGTHCs(氯贝特、乙醇、非诺贝特、吉非菲齐、六氯苯、苯巴比妥和y -14643)和11种ngtnhc(烯丙醇、阿司匹林、咖啡因、氯苯那敏、氯丙酰胺、地塞米松、地西泮、吲哚美辛、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺、苯胺和苯胺)。苯丁酮、茶碱和甲苯丁酰胺)在单次给药后24小时用PCA检测,准确率100%。这4个基因在重复给药28天后的29天内也能有效地从7种NGTHCs和10种ngtnhc中区分出2种典型的GTHCs(2-乙酰氨基芴和n -亚硝基二乙胺),与之前的12个基因相比,表现相似甚至更好。此外,本研究分析发现,三种中间GTHC/ ngthc (methapyrilene、monocrotaline和thiioacetamide)在沙门氏菌试验中呈阴性,而在体内大鼠肝脏试验中呈阳性,它们位于典型GTHC和典型ngthc之间的中间区域。结论:目前的结果明确地证明了四种基因毒性标记基因(Bax, Btg2, Ccng1和Cdkn1a)和PCA在Open TG-GATEs中区分GTHCs与NGTHCs和ngtnhc的有效性。这些发现有力地支持了我们的建议,即未来的大鼠肝脏体内毒性基因组学测试优先考虑这四种基因毒性标记基因,因为它们已被证明在区分不同类型的肝癌物质方面非常有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genes and Environment
Genes and Environment Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Genes and Environment is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that aims to accelerate communications among global scientists working in the field of genes and environment. The journal publishes articles across a broad range of topics including environmental mutagenesis and carcinogenesis, environmental genomics and epigenetics, molecular epidemiology, genetic toxicology and regulatory sciences. Topics published in the journal include, but are not limited to, mutagenesis and anti-mutagenesis in bacteria; genotoxicity in mammalian somatic cells; genotoxicity in germ cells; replication and repair; DNA damage; metabolic activation and inactivation; water and air pollution; ROS, NO and photoactivation; pharmaceuticals and anticancer agents; radiation; endocrine disrupters; indirect mutagenesis; threshold; new techniques for environmental mutagenesis studies; DNA methylation (enzymatic); structure activity relationship; chemoprevention of cancer; regulatory science. Genetic toxicology including risk evaluation for human health, validation studies on testing methods and subjects of guidelines for regulation of chemicals are also within its scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信