Azadeh Zolfaghari, Keivan Beheshti-Maal, Ali Mohammad Ahadi, Ramesh Monajemi
{"title":"A novel inhibitory strategy of <i>Leishmania major</i> using <i>Kluyveromyces lactis</i> and <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> killer toxins.","authors":"Azadeh Zolfaghari, Keivan Beheshti-Maal, Ali Mohammad Ahadi, Ramesh Monajemi","doi":"10.1080/17460913.2024.2443329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Leishmaniasis is a globally prevalent parasitic disease that has drawn significant attention. Killer yeasts offer a novel biological control method, presenting a potential alternative for treating leishmaniasis. This study evaluates the antileishmanial activity of <i>Kluyveromyces lactis</i> and <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> killer toxins against <i>Leishmania major</i>.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>Killer yeasts were isolated using the Well method. The genes encoding K2 and K.L killer toxins were identified by PCR, and the toxins were purified via SDS-PAGE. Antileishmanial and cytotoxic effects on <i>L. major</i> promastigotes and amastigotes were evaluated using the MTT assay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The first killer isolate was identified as <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> ZBAM (GenBank accession: OQ376749.1) and the second as <i>Kluyveromyces lactis</i> ZBAM (GenBank accession: OQ401036.1). IC50 values of K2 and K.L toxins against <i>L. major</i> promastigotes were significantly lower than Glucantime and Amphotericin B. The EC50 values at 24 hours for Glucantime, K2, and K.L were 11.83 ± 0.02 μg/ml, 2.35 ± 0.01 μg/ml, and 3.23 ± 0.03 μg/ml, respectively. The EC50 values for K2 and K.L against <i>L. major</i> amastigotes were also lower than Glucantime.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the first report of the antileishmanial effects of K2 and K.L toxins against <i>L. major</i>, suggesting these yeasts as promising candidates for biological leishmaniasis treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":12773,"journal":{"name":"Future microbiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460913.2024.2443329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: Leishmaniasis is a globally prevalent parasitic disease that has drawn significant attention. Killer yeasts offer a novel biological control method, presenting a potential alternative for treating leishmaniasis. This study evaluates the antileishmanial activity of Kluyveromyces lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiae killer toxins against Leishmania major.
Materials & methods: Killer yeasts were isolated using the Well method. The genes encoding K2 and K.L killer toxins were identified by PCR, and the toxins were purified via SDS-PAGE. Antileishmanial and cytotoxic effects on L. major promastigotes and amastigotes were evaluated using the MTT assay.
Results: The first killer isolate was identified as Saccharomyces cerevisiae ZBAM (GenBank accession: OQ376749.1) and the second as Kluyveromyces lactis ZBAM (GenBank accession: OQ401036.1). IC50 values of K2 and K.L toxins against L. major promastigotes were significantly lower than Glucantime and Amphotericin B. The EC50 values at 24 hours for Glucantime, K2, and K.L were 11.83 ± 0.02 μg/ml, 2.35 ± 0.01 μg/ml, and 3.23 ± 0.03 μg/ml, respectively. The EC50 values for K2 and K.L against L. major amastigotes were also lower than Glucantime.
Conclusion: This is the first report of the antileishmanial effects of K2 and K.L toxins against L. major, suggesting these yeasts as promising candidates for biological leishmaniasis treatment.
期刊介绍:
Future Microbiology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats. Key advances in the field are reported and analyzed by international experts, providing an authoritative but accessible forum for this increasingly important and vast area of research.