Enhancing lymphoscintigraphic specificity of lymphoedema diagnosis in patients with lipoedema.

IF 2.2 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Clinical Obesity Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1111/cob.12730
Hadrien Amiel, Julien Coulie, Raphaël Georis, Raquel van la Parra, Genevieve Pirson, Christine Deconinck
{"title":"Enhancing lymphoscintigraphic specificity of lymphoedema diagnosis in patients with lipoedema.","authors":"Hadrien Amiel, Julien Coulie, Raphaël Georis, Raquel van la Parra, Genevieve Pirson, Christine Deconinck","doi":"10.1111/cob.12730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study addresses the diagnostic challenges of identifying lymphoedema in patients with lipoedema using lymphoscintigraphy. Overdiagnosis of lymphoedema in this patient population is frequent and may result in reduced proposed surgical interventions. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients followed for lipoedema, lymphoedema or lipolymphoedema and who underwent lymphoscintigraphy. All patients were assigned a clinical or lymphoscintigraphic diagnosis of lymphoedema and concordance between clinical and lymphoscintigraphic diagnosis was assessed. A modification of lymphoscintigraphic criteria interpretation was proposed to enhance the diagnosis specificity. We included 94 female patients (188 lower limbs). One hundred and thirty-seven limbs presented with signs of lipoedema (137/188; 72.9%) and 42 with clinical signs of lymphoedema (42/188; 22.3%). Overall, 125 limbs presented with a diagnosis of lymphoedema on lymphoscintigraphy (125/188; 66.5%). Using lymphoscintigraphy to diagnose lymphoedema in patients with lipoedema resulted in low specificity (38.3%). By adjusting the interpretation criteria of the lymphoscintigraphic anomalies, we could achieve a specificity of 80.85%, reducing the risk of overdiagnosing lymphoedema in patients with lipoedema. This study contributes to the ongoing efforts to optimize the assessment and management of patients with lipoedema and potential lymphatic involvement, by modifying the interpretation of lymphoscintigraphic criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":10399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Obesity","volume":" ","pages":"e12730"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cob.12730","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the diagnostic challenges of identifying lymphoedema in patients with lipoedema using lymphoscintigraphy. Overdiagnosis of lymphoedema in this patient population is frequent and may result in reduced proposed surgical interventions. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from patients followed for lipoedema, lymphoedema or lipolymphoedema and who underwent lymphoscintigraphy. All patients were assigned a clinical or lymphoscintigraphic diagnosis of lymphoedema and concordance between clinical and lymphoscintigraphic diagnosis was assessed. A modification of lymphoscintigraphic criteria interpretation was proposed to enhance the diagnosis specificity. We included 94 female patients (188 lower limbs). One hundred and thirty-seven limbs presented with signs of lipoedema (137/188; 72.9%) and 42 with clinical signs of lymphoedema (42/188; 22.3%). Overall, 125 limbs presented with a diagnosis of lymphoedema on lymphoscintigraphy (125/188; 66.5%). Using lymphoscintigraphy to diagnose lymphoedema in patients with lipoedema resulted in low specificity (38.3%). By adjusting the interpretation criteria of the lymphoscintigraphic anomalies, we could achieve a specificity of 80.85%, reducing the risk of overdiagnosing lymphoedema in patients with lipoedema. This study contributes to the ongoing efforts to optimize the assessment and management of patients with lipoedema and potential lymphatic involvement, by modifying the interpretation of lymphoscintigraphic criteria.

提高脂肪性水肿患者淋巴管造影诊断的特异性。
本研究解决了使用淋巴显像识别脂水肿患者淋巴水肿的诊断挑战。过度诊断淋巴水肿在这一患者群体中是常见的,并可能导致减少建议的手术干预。我们回顾性分析了脂水肿、淋巴水肿或脂性水肿患者的临床资料,并进行了淋巴显像检查。所有患者均被指定为淋巴水肿的临床或淋巴显像诊断,并评估临床和淋巴显像诊断的一致性。为了提高诊断的特异性,我们建议修改淋巴显像标准的解释。我们纳入了94例女性患者(188条下肢)。137个肢体出现脂水肿的迹象(137/188;72.9%),有淋巴水肿临床症状的42例(42/188;22.3%)。总的来说,125个肢体在淋巴显像上被诊断为淋巴水肿(125/188;66.5%)。使用淋巴显像诊断脂质水肿的特异性较低(38.3%)。通过调整淋巴显像异常的解释标准,我们可以达到80.85%的特异性,降低脂水肿患者过度诊断淋巴水肿的风险。本研究通过修改淋巴影像学标准的解释,有助于优化脂水肿和潜在淋巴受累患者的评估和管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Obesity
Clinical Obesity ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: Clinical Obesity is an international peer-reviewed journal publishing high quality translational and clinical research papers and reviews focussing on obesity and its co-morbidities. Key areas of interest are: • Patient assessment, classification, diagnosis and prognosis • Drug treatments, clinical trials and supporting research • Bariatric surgery and follow-up issues • Surgical approaches to remove body fat • Pharmacological, dietary and behavioural approaches for weight loss • Clinical physiology • Clinically relevant epidemiology • Psychological aspects of obesity • Co-morbidities • Nursing and care of patients with obesity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信