Novel Method to Assess Macrophage Phenotype Using Eluted Media.

IF 2.9 4区 生物学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Furqan Mahdi, David Lillyman, Kayla Ney, Rebecca A Wachs
{"title":"Novel Method to Assess Macrophage Phenotype Using Eluted Media.","authors":"Furqan Mahdi, David Lillyman, Kayla Ney, Rebecca A Wachs","doi":"10.1159/000543141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Macrophages exist on a spectrum from pro-inflammatory (M1) to pro-healing (M2). Characterization of macrophage phenotype is important to understand tissue healing and response. The gold standard for assessing macrophage phenotypes is immunocytochemistry (ICC), which stains inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS) and arginase (Arg1), the proteins secreted before nitrite and urea production. The ICC method is an endpoint assay, time-consuming, and costly. Therefore, a more effective method to assess the phenotype of macrophages in vitro is needed. Based on the phenotype of the macrophage, arginine gets metabolized differently. If arginine is metabolized by M1 macrophages it produces nitrite and if it is metabolized by M2 macrophages it produces urea. A method that leverages arginine metabolism through secreted products (urea and nitrite) has the potential to determine macrophage phenotype in real-time.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Rat bone marrow-derived macrophages were cultured to be naïve or polarized to M1-like or M2-like. The ICC method was used to determine the intensity of the iNOS and Arg1 staining. Nitrite and urea kits were utilized to measure the concentration of nitrite and urea in the media eluted from the various phenotypes. Nitrite and urea concentrations were compared to ICC results to validate the new method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC revealed the iNOS staining was significant and 2.5 folds higher in M1-like macrophages and the Arg1 staining was significant and 1.5 folds higher in the M2-like macrophages. The nitrite concentration was significant and 4 folds higher in the M1-like macrophage. The urea concentration was significant and 2.5 folds higher in the M2-like macrophage media. A correlation analysis showed that iNOS staining intensity and nitrite concentration levels had a linear correlation as well as Arg1 staining intensity and urea concentration levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Data confirm that the determination of nitrite and urea concentration can be utilized to assess macrophage phenotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9717,"journal":{"name":"Cells Tissues Organs","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cells Tissues Organs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Macrophages exist on a spectrum from pro-inflammatory (M1) to pro-healing (M2). Characterization of macrophage phenotype is important to understand tissue healing and response. The gold standard for assessing macrophage phenotypes is immunocytochemistry (ICC), which stains inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase (iNOS) and arginase (Arg1), the proteins secreted before nitrite and urea production. The ICC method is an endpoint assay, time-consuming, and costly. Therefore, a more effective method to assess the phenotype of macrophages in vitro is needed. Based on the phenotype of the macrophage, arginine gets metabolized differently. If arginine is metabolized by M1 macrophages it produces nitrite and if it is metabolized by M2 macrophages it produces urea. A method that leverages arginine metabolism through secreted products (urea and nitrite) has the potential to determine macrophage phenotype in real-time.

Methods: Rat bone marrow-derived macrophages were cultured to be naïve or polarized to M1-like or M2-like. The ICC method was used to determine the intensity of the iNOS and Arg1 staining. Nitrite and urea kits were utilized to measure the concentration of nitrite and urea in the media eluted from the various phenotypes. Nitrite and urea concentrations were compared to ICC results to validate the new method.

Results: ICC revealed the iNOS staining was significant and 2.5 folds higher in M1-like macrophages and the Arg1 staining was significant and 1.5 folds higher in the M2-like macrophages. The nitrite concentration was significant and 4 folds higher in the M1-like macrophage. The urea concentration was significant and 2.5 folds higher in the M2-like macrophage media. A correlation analysis showed that iNOS staining intensity and nitrite concentration levels had a linear correlation as well as Arg1 staining intensity and urea concentration levels.

Conclusion: Data confirm that the determination of nitrite and urea concentration can be utilized to assess macrophage phenotypes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cells Tissues Organs
Cells Tissues Organs 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Cells Tissues Organs'' aims at bridging the gap between cell biology and developmental biology and the emerging fields of regenerative medicine (stem cell biology, tissue engineering, artificial organs, in vitro systems and transplantation biology). CTO offers a rapid and fair peer-review and exquisite reproduction quality. Special topic issues, entire issues of the journal devoted to a single research topic within the range of interests of the journal, are published at irregular intervals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信