Quality of life and quality of care experience in Australian residential aged care: a retrospective cohort study of 1,772 residents.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Guogui Huang, Nasir Wabe, Magdalena Z Raban, Amy D Nguyen, S Sandun M Silva, Ying Xu, Julie Ratcliffe, Jyoti Khadka, Johanna I Westbrook
{"title":"Quality of life and quality of care experience in Australian residential aged care: a retrospective cohort study of 1,772 residents.","authors":"Guogui Huang, Nasir Wabe, Magdalena Z Raban, Amy D Nguyen, S Sandun M Silva, Ying Xu, Julie Ratcliffe, Jyoti Khadka, Johanna I Westbrook","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05472-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In April 2023, quality of life (QOL) and quality of care experience (QCE) indicators were introduced as mandatory indicators in Australian residential aged care (RAC) to measure and monitor wellbeing and consumer experience respectively. In this study, we used data for the initial four months after their introduction to describe QOL and QCE scores, explore related factors and assess variations by completion mode and facility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using electronic data (Mar-Jun 2023) from 1,772 residents in 22 RAC facilities in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. QOL was measured by the Quality of Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC) scale, and QCE by the Quality of Care Experience-Aged Care Consumer (QCE-ACC) scale, both through three completion modes: self, interviewer-facilitated and proxy completion. Propensity score matching was used to compare QOL/QCE differences by completion mode; multilevel ordinal logistic regression to investigate QOL-/QCE-related factors; and funnel plots to explore facility-level score variations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1,772 residents, 1,706 completed the QOL-ACC survey and 1,686 the QCE-ACC. The median score was 21 (interquartile range 18-24) for QOL and 23 (interquartile range 20-24) for QCE, both indicating 'excellent' outcomes. The leisure activities component of QOL, and social relationships and complaint lodging of QCE, were rated relatively lower than other dimensions. The scores of both indicators were significantly higher for self-completion versus other completion modes. Significant variation in QOL and QCE scores by facility were also observed, with seven and four facilities with lower-than-expected proportions of residents with 'excellent' or 'good' ratings of QOL and QCE, respectively. A longer length of stay (odd ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.92 for ≥ 3 years of stay versus < 1 year of stay) and fall history (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60-0.91) were associated with lower QOL, while having a visual impairment (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and fall history (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) were associated with lower QCE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found high QOL and QCE across the 22 Australian RAC facilities. Enhancing residents' leisure activities, social relationships, and addressing specific needs (e.g., visual impairment and fall history) may enhance QOL and QCE.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"1006"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05472-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In April 2023, quality of life (QOL) and quality of care experience (QCE) indicators were introduced as mandatory indicators in Australian residential aged care (RAC) to measure and monitor wellbeing and consumer experience respectively. In this study, we used data for the initial four months after their introduction to describe QOL and QCE scores, explore related factors and assess variations by completion mode and facility.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study using electronic data (Mar-Jun 2023) from 1,772 residents in 22 RAC facilities in metropolitan Sydney, Australia. QOL was measured by the Quality of Life-Aged Care Consumer (QOL-ACC) scale, and QCE by the Quality of Care Experience-Aged Care Consumer (QCE-ACC) scale, both through three completion modes: self, interviewer-facilitated and proxy completion. Propensity score matching was used to compare QOL/QCE differences by completion mode; multilevel ordinal logistic regression to investigate QOL-/QCE-related factors; and funnel plots to explore facility-level score variations.

Results: Of 1,772 residents, 1,706 completed the QOL-ACC survey and 1,686 the QCE-ACC. The median score was 21 (interquartile range 18-24) for QOL and 23 (interquartile range 20-24) for QCE, both indicating 'excellent' outcomes. The leisure activities component of QOL, and social relationships and complaint lodging of QCE, were rated relatively lower than other dimensions. The scores of both indicators were significantly higher for self-completion versus other completion modes. Significant variation in QOL and QCE scores by facility were also observed, with seven and four facilities with lower-than-expected proportions of residents with 'excellent' or 'good' ratings of QOL and QCE, respectively. A longer length of stay (odd ratio [OR] = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.92 for ≥ 3 years of stay versus < 1 year of stay) and fall history (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.60-0.91) were associated with lower QOL, while having a visual impairment (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99) and fall history (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.64-0.99) were associated with lower QCE.

Conclusion: We found high QOL and QCE across the 22 Australian RAC facilities. Enhancing residents' leisure activities, social relationships, and addressing specific needs (e.g., visual impairment and fall history) may enhance QOL and QCE.

澳洲居家老年照护的生活品质与照护体验品质:一项1772位居民的回顾性队列研究。
背景:在2023年4月,生活质量(QOL)和护理体验质量(QCE)指标被引入澳大利亚住宅老年护理(RAC)作为强制性指标,分别衡量和监测健康和消费者体验。在这项研究中,我们使用了他们引入后最初四个月的数据来描述QOL和QCE分数,探索相关因素并评估完成模式和设施的变化。方法:一项回顾性队列研究,使用电子数据(2023年3月至6月),来自澳大利亚悉尼大都会22家RAC设施的1772名居民。QOL采用生活-老年护理消费者质量量表(QOL- acc)测量,QCE采用护理体验-老年护理消费者质量量表(QCE- acc)测量,均采用自我完成、访谈者辅助完成和代理完成三种完成模式。采用倾向评分匹配比较完成方式的QOL/QCE差异;多水平有序logistic回归分析QOL / qce相关因素;以及漏斗图来探索设施级别的得分变化。结果:1772名居民中,1706人完成了QOL-ACC调查,1686人完成了QCE-ACC调查。QOL的中位得分为21分(四分位范围为18-24),QCE的中位得分为23分(四分位范围为20-24),均表示“优秀”的结果。休闲活动维度、社会关系维度和投诉维度的评分相对较低。自我完成的两项指标得分均显著高于其他完成模式。不同设施的生活质量和质量质量评分也存在显著差异,分别有7个和4个设施的生活质量和质量质量评分为“优秀”或“良好”的居民比例低于预期。≥3年的住院时间较长(奇数比[OR] = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53-0.92),结论:我们发现22家澳大利亚RAC设施的生活质量和质量质量均较高。加强居民的休闲活动、社会关系和解决特定需求(如视力障碍和跌倒史)可能会提高生活质量和生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信