3-Month Melatonin Supplementation to Reduce Brain Oxidative Stress and Improve Sleep in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Zoe Menczel Schrire, Craig L. Phillips, Shantel L. Duffy, Nathaniel S. Marshall, Loren Mowszowski, Haley M. La Monica, Lachlan Stranks, Christopher J. Gordon, Julia L. Chapman, Bandana Saini, Sharon L. Naismith, Ronald R. Grunstein, Camilla M. Hoyos
{"title":"3-Month Melatonin Supplementation to Reduce Brain Oxidative Stress and Improve Sleep in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial","authors":"Zoe Menczel Schrire,&nbsp;Craig L. Phillips,&nbsp;Shantel L. Duffy,&nbsp;Nathaniel S. Marshall,&nbsp;Loren Mowszowski,&nbsp;Haley M. La Monica,&nbsp;Lachlan Stranks,&nbsp;Christopher J. Gordon,&nbsp;Julia L. Chapman,&nbsp;Bandana Saini,&nbsp;Sharon L. Naismith,&nbsp;Ronald R. Grunstein,&nbsp;Camilla M. Hoyos","doi":"10.1111/jpi.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Melatonin has multiple proposed therapeutic benefits including antioxidant properties, circadian rhythm synchronisation and sleep promotion. Since these areas are also recognised risk factors for dementia, melatonin has been hypothesised to slow cognitive decline in older adults.</p>\n <p>Participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) were recruited from the community for a 12-week randomised placebo-controlled parallel, feasibility trial of 25 mg oral melatonin nightly. Primary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability. Secondary efficacy outcomes were brain oxidative stress, cognition, mood, and sleep at 12 weeks.</p>\n <p>Forty participants (mean [SD] age = 68.2 [4.7] years; 19 female) were randomised. Feasibility, defined as those who met eligibility criteria, was 42/389, 11%. Acceptability, determined by the proportion of eligible people who agreed to be randomised, was 40/44, 91%. Tolerability, determined by adherence to the nightly melatonin and completion of the main secondary outcome (Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy scan) was over the pre-defined 80% threshold for all participants. The study was not powered to detect effectiveness. Accordingly, there were no significant differences between melatonin and placebo interventions in any of the secondary outcomes.</p>\n <p>The protocol was developed, and successfully implemented, with the planned number of eligible participants recruited. All participants were able to complete all aspects of the trial, including online visits and assessments, with no differences in adverse events between groups. This is promising for future trials, which should conduct the study with a larger sample size and longer duration to yield necessary efficacy data.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pineal Research","volume":"76 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pineal Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jpi.70019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Melatonin has multiple proposed therapeutic benefits including antioxidant properties, circadian rhythm synchronisation and sleep promotion. Since these areas are also recognised risk factors for dementia, melatonin has been hypothesised to slow cognitive decline in older adults.

Participants with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) were recruited from the community for a 12-week randomised placebo-controlled parallel, feasibility trial of 25 mg oral melatonin nightly. Primary outcomes were feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability. Secondary efficacy outcomes were brain oxidative stress, cognition, mood, and sleep at 12 weeks.

Forty participants (mean [SD] age = 68.2 [4.7] years; 19 female) were randomised. Feasibility, defined as those who met eligibility criteria, was 42/389, 11%. Acceptability, determined by the proportion of eligible people who agreed to be randomised, was 40/44, 91%. Tolerability, determined by adherence to the nightly melatonin and completion of the main secondary outcome (Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy scan) was over the pre-defined 80% threshold for all participants. The study was not powered to detect effectiveness. Accordingly, there were no significant differences between melatonin and placebo interventions in any of the secondary outcomes.

The protocol was developed, and successfully implemented, with the planned number of eligible participants recruited. All participants were able to complete all aspects of the trial, including online visits and assessments, with no differences in adverse events between groups. This is promising for future trials, which should conduct the study with a larger sample size and longer duration to yield necessary efficacy data.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pineal Research
Journal of Pineal Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
66
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pineal Research welcomes original scientific research on the pineal gland and melatonin in vertebrates, as well as the biological functions of melatonin in non-vertebrates, plants, and microorganisms. Criteria for publication include scientific importance, novelty, timeliness, and clarity of presentation. The journal considers experimental data that challenge current thinking and welcomes case reports contributing to understanding the pineal gland and melatonin research. Its aim is to serve researchers in all disciplines related to the pineal gland and melatonin.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信