Females Guarded by Sneaker Males Experience Higher Predation in the Two-Spotted Spider Mite

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ethology Pub Date : 2024-10-27 DOI:10.1111/eth.13524
Taito Sano, Tanvi Gurjar, Martijn Egas, Yukie Sato
{"title":"Females Guarded by Sneaker Males Experience Higher Predation in the Two-Spotted Spider Mite","authors":"Taito Sano,&nbsp;Tanvi Gurjar,&nbsp;Martijn Egas,&nbsp;Yukie Sato","doi":"10.1111/eth.13524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Males often employ different reproductive tactics to gain access to females based on their condition and the surrounding environment. Predation risk is expected to have a significant influence on the frequencies of alternative reproductive tactics because these tactics typically differ in activity, which may result in differences in predation rate. In theory, such predation effects can explain the evolution as well as the maintenance of alternative reproductive tactics. Yet, there is little experimental work testing how predation risk affects alternative reproductive tactics. To assess such effects of predation, here we report on experiments with the two-spotted spider mite <i>Tetranychus urticae</i>. The two-spotted spider mite is a small arthropod herbivore species, in which males exhibit precopulatory mate guarding by mounting preadult moulting (and hence immobile) females. Two reproductive tactics are observed during mate guarding: The fighting tactic involves attacking other males to drive them away, while the sneaking tactic involves mounting the females and remaining motionless, even when contacted by other males. In this study, we exposed pairs of male and female spider mites to a predatory mite (<i>Phytoseiulus persimilis</i>) and observed their survival and male response to a predator when females were guarded by either fighter or sneaker males. We found that predation risk was not significantly different between fighter and sneaker males. However, the immobile females were more often preyed upon when guarded by sneakers than when guarded by fighters. We attribute this indirect effect of predation risk to the sneakers continuing to mount females even when a predator is nearby.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"131 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13524","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13524","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Males often employ different reproductive tactics to gain access to females based on their condition and the surrounding environment. Predation risk is expected to have a significant influence on the frequencies of alternative reproductive tactics because these tactics typically differ in activity, which may result in differences in predation rate. In theory, such predation effects can explain the evolution as well as the maintenance of alternative reproductive tactics. Yet, there is little experimental work testing how predation risk affects alternative reproductive tactics. To assess such effects of predation, here we report on experiments with the two-spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae. The two-spotted spider mite is a small arthropod herbivore species, in which males exhibit precopulatory mate guarding by mounting preadult moulting (and hence immobile) females. Two reproductive tactics are observed during mate guarding: The fighting tactic involves attacking other males to drive them away, while the sneaking tactic involves mounting the females and remaining motionless, even when contacted by other males. In this study, we exposed pairs of male and female spider mites to a predatory mite (Phytoseiulus persimilis) and observed their survival and male response to a predator when females were guarded by either fighter or sneaker males. We found that predation risk was not significantly different between fighter and sneaker males. However, the immobile females were more often preyed upon when guarded by sneakers than when guarded by fighters. We attribute this indirect effect of predation risk to the sneakers continuing to mount females even when a predator is nearby.

Abstract Image

在双斑蜘蛛螨中,被Sneaker雄性看守的雌性蜘蛛有更高的捕食率
雄性通常会根据自己的状况和周围环境采取不同的繁殖策略来接近雌性。捕食风险预计会对不同繁殖策略的频率产生重大影响,因为这些策略的活动通常不同,这可能导致捕食率的差异。从理论上讲,这种捕食效应可以解释替代性繁殖策略的进化和维持。然而,很少有实验工作测试捕食风险如何影响其他繁殖策略。为了评估这种捕食的影响,在这里,我们报告了双斑叶螨的实验。双斑蜘蛛螨是一种小型节肢动物食草物种,其中雄性蜘蛛螨通过骑在成年前蜕皮(因此无法移动)的雌性上来保护交配前的配偶。在守护配偶的过程中,观察到两种繁殖策略:战斗策略包括攻击其他雄性,将它们赶走,而偷偷摸摸的策略包括骑在雌性身上,即使有其他雄性接触,也保持静止不动。在这项研究中,我们将雄性和雌性蜘蛛螨对暴露于一种掠食性螨(Phytoseiulus persimilis)中,观察了雌性蜘蛛螨在被战斗或运动鞋雄性保护时的存活率和雄性对掠食性螨的反应。我们发现好斗雄性和运动鞋雄性的捕食风险没有显著差异。然而,在运动鞋的保护下,一动不动的雌性比在战士的保护下更容易被捕食。我们将这种捕食风险的间接影响归因于即使捕食者就在附近,球鞋也会继续骑在雌性身上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信