Seismic design of steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame system by failure mode control

IF 4.3 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mostafa Fathi Sepahvand, Akhrawat Lenwari
{"title":"Seismic design of steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame system by failure mode control","authors":"Mostafa Fathi Sepahvand,&nbsp;Akhrawat Lenwari","doi":"10.1002/eqe.4258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper presents the seismic design of a steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame (MKF) using the theory of plastic mechanism control (TPMC) within the capacity-based design framework. The MKF is an alternative system to MRFs, wherein knee elements are utilized to provide rigid connections and enhance lateral stiffness. Capacity-based design, the predominant approach in current seismic provisions, relies on two key principles: (1) selecting specific structural components as fuses with sufficient ductility to dissipate seismic energy, and (2) ensuring non-fuse elements can resist the maximum probable reactions from these fuses. The ultimate goal is to achieve a global mechanism where yielding occurs in all structural fuses and at the base of first-story columns. However, existing seismic design provisions often struggle to fully satisfy the second principle due to the lack of a method for controlling failure modes. TPMC addresses this challenge by ensuring compliance with the second principle, grounding its approach in the kinematic method and the mechanism equilibrium curve within the rigid-plastic analysis framework. By considering all potential story-based undesirable mechanisms and calculating the required plastic moment of columns up to a target design displacement, TPMC ensures adherence to the second principle of the capacity-based design approach, leading to the achievement of a global collapse mechanism. In this paper, an iterative method is proposed for designing beams and knee elements by considering plastic hinges at both ends of the beams, followed by a TPMC-based methodology for designing columns to ensure a global mechanism. A parametric analysis of a single-story single-span MKF explores the effects of knee element geometry (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>L</mi>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>${l}_b/L$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <annotation>$\\beta $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) on component demands. The results indicate that optimal parameter ranges of <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mn>0.175</mn>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mi>b</mi>\n </msub>\n <mo>/</mo>\n <mi>L</mi>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <mn>0.25</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$0.175 \\le {l}_b/L \\le 0.25$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msup>\n <mn>40</mn>\n <mo>∘</mo>\n </msup>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <mi>β</mi>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n <msup>\n <mn>60</mn>\n <mo>∘</mo>\n </msup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$40^\\circ \\le \\beta \\le 60^\\circ $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> can minimize the demands for MKF components. Practical design examples are illustrated using three steel MKFs, each consisting of four, seven, and ten stories with five spans. Pushover analysis and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure in ensuring the attainment of a global mechanism and excellent seismic performance under real ground motions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11390,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","volume":"54 1","pages":"271-294"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eqe.4258","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the seismic design of a steel moment-resisting knee-braced frame (MKF) using the theory of plastic mechanism control (TPMC) within the capacity-based design framework. The MKF is an alternative system to MRFs, wherein knee elements are utilized to provide rigid connections and enhance lateral stiffness. Capacity-based design, the predominant approach in current seismic provisions, relies on two key principles: (1) selecting specific structural components as fuses with sufficient ductility to dissipate seismic energy, and (2) ensuring non-fuse elements can resist the maximum probable reactions from these fuses. The ultimate goal is to achieve a global mechanism where yielding occurs in all structural fuses and at the base of first-story columns. However, existing seismic design provisions often struggle to fully satisfy the second principle due to the lack of a method for controlling failure modes. TPMC addresses this challenge by ensuring compliance with the second principle, grounding its approach in the kinematic method and the mechanism equilibrium curve within the rigid-plastic analysis framework. By considering all potential story-based undesirable mechanisms and calculating the required plastic moment of columns up to a target design displacement, TPMC ensures adherence to the second principle of the capacity-based design approach, leading to the achievement of a global collapse mechanism. In this paper, an iterative method is proposed for designing beams and knee elements by considering plastic hinges at both ends of the beams, followed by a TPMC-based methodology for designing columns to ensure a global mechanism. A parametric analysis of a single-story single-span MKF explores the effects of knee element geometry ( l b / L ${l}_b/L$ and β $\beta $ ) on component demands. The results indicate that optimal parameter ranges of 0.175 l b / L 0.25 $0.175 \le {l}_b/L \le 0.25$ and 40 β 60 $40^\circ \le \beta \le 60^\circ $ can minimize the demands for MKF components. Practical design examples are illustrated using three steel MKFs, each consisting of four, seven, and ten stories with five spans. Pushover analysis and nonlinear dynamic analyses were performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed design procedure in ensuring the attainment of a global mechanism and excellent seismic performance under real ground motions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 工程技术-工程:地质
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
180
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics provides a forum for the publication of papers on several aspects of engineering related to earthquakes. The problems in this field, and their solutions, are international in character and require knowledge of several traditional disciplines; the Journal will reflect this. Papers that may be relevant but do not emphasize earthquake engineering and related structural dynamics are not suitable for the Journal. Relevant topics include the following: ground motions for analysis and design geotechnical earthquake engineering probabilistic and deterministic methods of dynamic analysis experimental behaviour of structures seismic protective systems system identification risk assessment seismic code requirements methods for earthquake-resistant design and retrofit of structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信