Restoring historical moose densities results in fewer wolves killed for woodland caribou conservation

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Michelle L. McLellan, Adam T. Ford, Dave Hervieux, Clayton T. Lamb, Mateen Hessami, Michael C. Bridger, Robert Serrouya
{"title":"Restoring historical moose densities results in fewer wolves killed for woodland caribou conservation","authors":"Michelle L. McLellan,&nbsp;Adam T. Ford,&nbsp;Dave Hervieux,&nbsp;Clayton T. Lamb,&nbsp;Mateen Hessami,&nbsp;Michael C. Bridger,&nbsp;Robert Serrouya","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.22673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Woodland caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus caribou</i>) are declining across much of their distribution in Canada in response to habitat alteration, leading to unsustainable predation, particularly by wolves (<i>Canis lupus</i>). Habitat alteration can benefit the primary prey species of wolves (moose [<i>Alces alces</i>] and deer [<i>Odocoileus</i> spp.]) by creating early seral conditions that contain more of their preferred food types. This increase in primary prey populations results in elevated wolf abundance and heightened predation pressure on caribou. In response to the elevated wolf populations and the risks to caribou, managers have reduced wolf abundance in key areas. Ecological theory suggests that reducing wolf abundance would release moose from the top-down effects of wolf predation, potentially allowing moose populations to grow. Elevated moose abundance thus has the potential to cause wolf populations to rebound quickly each year following reductions, suggesting a possible link between moose abundance and the number of wolves killed for caribou conservation. To test this idea we used a unique management situation in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, where lethal wolf removals were annually conducted across specific southern mountain caribou population ranges and, in some places, moose populations were concurrently reduced via liberalized hunting. We used indices of moose abundance and wolf removal data to test the hypothesis that reducing moose populations to a historical abundance target by hunting leads to fewer wolves killed for caribou conservation. After controlling for habitat quality, wolves removed per km<sup>2</sup> was 3.2 times lower in areas with reduced moose density (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mover>\n <mi>x</mi>\n \n <mo>¯</mo>\n </mover>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\bar{x}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> = 1.55 wolves/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> ± 0.33 [SE]) than in those without reduced moose density (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n \n <mrow>\n <mover>\n <mi>x</mi>\n \n <mo>¯</mo>\n </mover>\n </mrow>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\bar{x}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> = 5.02 wolves/1,000 km<sup>2</sup> ± 0.52). However, the average number of wolves removed per year decreased under both conditions. After 9 years, there was a 35% reduction in the predicted difference in the annual removal between areas with and without moose reduction. Our results suggest that policies that do not reduce or stabilize moose abundance will result in the removal of more wolves to increase caribou abundance. Like wolf reductions, moose reductions can also be controversial and affect local harvesters. Thus, understanding the consequences of actions that support caribou recovery is essential to supporting evidence-based policy discussions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jwmg.22673","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.22673","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) are declining across much of their distribution in Canada in response to habitat alteration, leading to unsustainable predation, particularly by wolves (Canis lupus). Habitat alteration can benefit the primary prey species of wolves (moose [Alces alces] and deer [Odocoileus spp.]) by creating early seral conditions that contain more of their preferred food types. This increase in primary prey populations results in elevated wolf abundance and heightened predation pressure on caribou. In response to the elevated wolf populations and the risks to caribou, managers have reduced wolf abundance in key areas. Ecological theory suggests that reducing wolf abundance would release moose from the top-down effects of wolf predation, potentially allowing moose populations to grow. Elevated moose abundance thus has the potential to cause wolf populations to rebound quickly each year following reductions, suggesting a possible link between moose abundance and the number of wolves killed for caribou conservation. To test this idea we used a unique management situation in British Columbia and Alberta, Canada, where lethal wolf removals were annually conducted across specific southern mountain caribou population ranges and, in some places, moose populations were concurrently reduced via liberalized hunting. We used indices of moose abundance and wolf removal data to test the hypothesis that reducing moose populations to a historical abundance target by hunting leads to fewer wolves killed for caribou conservation. After controlling for habitat quality, wolves removed per km2 was 3.2 times lower in areas with reduced moose density ( x ¯ $\bar{x}$  = 1.55 wolves/1,000 km2 ± 0.33 [SE]) than in those without reduced moose density ( x ¯ $\bar{x}$  = 5.02 wolves/1,000 km2 ± 0.52). However, the average number of wolves removed per year decreased under both conditions. After 9 years, there was a 35% reduction in the predicted difference in the annual removal between areas with and without moose reduction. Our results suggest that policies that do not reduce or stabilize moose abundance will result in the removal of more wolves to increase caribou abundance. Like wolf reductions, moose reductions can also be controversial and affect local harvesters. Thus, understanding the consequences of actions that support caribou recovery is essential to supporting evidence-based policy discussions.

Abstract Image

恢复驼鹿的历史密度可减少为保护林地驯鹿而捕杀的狼群数量
林地驯鹿(Rangifer tarandus caribou)在加拿大分布的大部分地区都在减少,以应对栖息地的改变,导致不可持续的捕食,特别是狼(Canis lupus)。栖息地的改变可以为狼的主要猎物物种(驼鹿和鹿)创造早期的几种条件,使它们拥有更多喜欢的食物类型,从而使它们受益。主要猎物数量的增加导致狼数量的增加和驯鹿捕食压力的增加。为了应对狼数量的增加和对驯鹿的威胁,管理人员减少了关键地区的狼数量。生态学理论认为,减少狼的数量将使驼鹿从狼捕食的自上而下的影响中解脱出来,从而有可能使驼鹿的数量增长。因此,驼鹿数量的增加有可能导致狼的数量在减少后每年迅速反弹,这表明驼鹿数量的增加与为保护北美驯鹿而杀死的狼数量之间可能存在联系。为了验证这一想法,我们在加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省和阿尔伯塔省采用了一种独特的管理情况,在那里,每年在特定的南部山地驯鹿种群范围内进行致命的狼清除,在一些地方,驼鹿种群同时通过自由狩猎减少。我们使用驼鹿丰度指数和狼的消失数据来验证这样一个假设,即通过狩猎将驼鹿数量减少到历史丰度目标,导致为保护北美驯鹿而杀死的狼减少。在控制了栖息地质量之后,驼鹿密度减少的地区(x¯$\bar{x}$ = 1.55只狼/ 1000 km2±0.33 [SE])每平方公里的狼移走量是未减少驼鹿密度的3.2倍(X¯$\bar{X}$ = 5.02只狼/1,000 km2±0.52)。然而,在这两种情况下,每年被清除的狼的平均数量都减少了。9年后,在驼鹿数量减少和驼鹿数量没有减少的地区之间,预测的年迁移量的差异减少了35%。我们的研究结果表明,不能减少或稳定驼鹿数量的政策将导致更多的狼被清除,以增加驯鹿的数量。像狼的减少一样,驼鹿的减少也会引起争议,并影响到当地的采集者。因此,了解支持北美驯鹿恢复的行动的后果对于支持基于证据的政策讨论至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信