A matter of trust? Analyzing the relationship between attitudes toward COVID-19 countermeasures and right-wing ideology in Germany

IF 1.8 4区 社会学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Lea-Johanna Klebba, Stephan Winter
{"title":"A matter of trust? Analyzing the relationship between attitudes toward COVID-19 countermeasures and right-wing ideology in Germany","authors":"Lea-Johanna Klebba,&nbsp;Stephan Winter","doi":"10.1111/asap.12427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has divided societies, especially regarding vaccine mandates. While research suggests that political ideology plays a crucial role in whether people support or oppose COVID-19 countermeasures, the relationship between these attitudes and political ideology remains unclear, with varying results across different countries. The present research focuses on right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) in Germany, examining its role as a predictor. Prior studies highlight that, conservatives and right-wing authoritarians, particularly in the USA, tend to hold more negative attitudes toward COVID-19 countermeasures despite RWA's usual association with unwavering support for state authorities. Therefore, the present survey study (<i>N</i> = 1063) investigated whether trust in politics and science moderates this relationship. Contrary to expectations, the findings revealed that RWA consistently predicted support for vaccine mandates independent of trust levels. Results are discussed about the specifics of the German case and more general relationships between political ideology and the support of state authorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":46799,"journal":{"name":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","volume":"24 3","pages":"1155-1173"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/asap.12427","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/asap.12427","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has divided societies, especially regarding vaccine mandates. While research suggests that political ideology plays a crucial role in whether people support or oppose COVID-19 countermeasures, the relationship between these attitudes and political ideology remains unclear, with varying results across different countries. The present research focuses on right-wing authoritarianism (RWA) in Germany, examining its role as a predictor. Prior studies highlight that, conservatives and right-wing authoritarians, particularly in the USA, tend to hold more negative attitudes toward COVID-19 countermeasures despite RWA's usual association with unwavering support for state authorities. Therefore, the present survey study (N = 1063) investigated whether trust in politics and science moderates this relationship. Contrary to expectations, the findings revealed that RWA consistently predicted support for vaccine mandates independent of trust levels. Results are discussed about the specifics of the German case and more general relationships between political ideology and the support of state authorities.

Abstract Image

信任问题?分析德国应对新冠肺炎的态度与右翼意识形态的关系
COVID-19大流行使社会分裂,特别是在疫苗授权方面。虽然研究表明,政治意识形态在人们是否支持或反对新冠肺炎对策方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但这些态度与政治意识形态之间的关系尚不清楚,不同国家的结果也不尽相同。目前的研究重点是德国的右翼威权主义(RWA),研究其作为预测因素的作用。先前的研究强调,保守派和右翼威权主义者,特别是在美国,倾向于对COVID-19对策持更消极的态度,尽管RWA通常与坚定不移地支持国家当局有关。因此,本调查研究(N = 1063)调查了对政治和科学的信任是否调节了这种关系。与预期相反,调查结果显示,RWA一贯预测对疫苗授权的支持与信任程度无关。结果讨论了德国案例的具体情况以及政治意识形态与国家当局支持之间的更一般关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Recent articles in ASAP have examined social psychological methods in the study of economic and social justice including ageism, heterosexism, racism, sexism, status quo bias and other forms of discrimination, social problems such as climate change, extremism, homelessness, inter-group conflict, natural disasters, poverty, and terrorism, and social ideals such as democracy, empowerment, equality, health, and trust.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信