Multihost/Multivector Community Network: Disentangling Sandfly Species and Host Interactions in Avian Habitats

IF 3.5 2区 农林科学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
J. Veiga, F. Collantes, L. M. Hernández-Triana, S. W. J. Prosser, F. Valera
{"title":"Multihost/Multivector Community Network: Disentangling Sandfly Species and Host Interactions in Avian Habitats","authors":"J. Veiga,&nbsp;F. Collantes,&nbsp;L. M. Hernández-Triana,&nbsp;S. W. J. Prosser,&nbsp;F. Valera","doi":"10.1155/tbed/9259030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Ascertaining the feeding behavior of vectors is a key for understanding epidemiology of the infections they transmit. For some host–vector–parasite systems, this information is biased towards human and peridomestic habitats, frequently underestimating the likely role of wildlife. In addition, studies on vector interactions often focus on a one-to-one host–vector relationship, even though it is crucial to analyze how multiple vector species interact with multiple hosts. These biases particularly affect our knowledge of sandflies, the main vector of <i>Leishmania</i> spp. and various phleboviruses, that are rarely explored in non-peridomestic habitats and in the context of multiple interactions with various hosts. To reveal the multihost/multivector network involving phlebotomine sandflies in a semiarid and poorly populated area of Spain, we sampled the sandfly community close to avian nests by means of two trapping methods (Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and sticky traps) during 3 years and identified the blood-meal source of all engorged sandflies. We detected six phlebotomine species with <i>Phlebotomus perniciosus</i>, <i>P. papatasi</i>, and <i>Sergentomyia minuta</i> being the most abundant ones. We identified 13 blood source species, with humans being the most common one, followed by <i>Coracias garrulus</i> (European roller) and <i>Sus scrofa</i> (likely wild boar). Five of the six sandfly species fed largely on wild mammals, although, three also fed on wild birds. <i>Phlebotomus sergenti</i> only fed on birds based on this analysis. <i>Phlebotomus papatasi</i> and <i>P. sergenti</i> were common visitors of bird nests suggesting an endophagic behavior. A network analysis showed a highly-connected and poorly-specialized network wherein sandflies shared most of the blood source and showed an opportunistic feeding behavior with marked anthropophilia. Our results obtained close to avian nests show that sandfly populations are maintained by various wild animals, which will greatly complicate the management and control of the pathogens they transmit to humans and domestic animals.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/9259030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/9259030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ascertaining the feeding behavior of vectors is a key for understanding epidemiology of the infections they transmit. For some host–vector–parasite systems, this information is biased towards human and peridomestic habitats, frequently underestimating the likely role of wildlife. In addition, studies on vector interactions often focus on a one-to-one host–vector relationship, even though it is crucial to analyze how multiple vector species interact with multiple hosts. These biases particularly affect our knowledge of sandflies, the main vector of Leishmania spp. and various phleboviruses, that are rarely explored in non-peridomestic habitats and in the context of multiple interactions with various hosts. To reveal the multihost/multivector network involving phlebotomine sandflies in a semiarid and poorly populated area of Spain, we sampled the sandfly community close to avian nests by means of two trapping methods (Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and sticky traps) during 3 years and identified the blood-meal source of all engorged sandflies. We detected six phlebotomine species with Phlebotomus perniciosus, P. papatasi, and Sergentomyia minuta being the most abundant ones. We identified 13 blood source species, with humans being the most common one, followed by Coracias garrulus (European roller) and Sus scrofa (likely wild boar). Five of the six sandfly species fed largely on wild mammals, although, three also fed on wild birds. Phlebotomus sergenti only fed on birds based on this analysis. Phlebotomus papatasi and P. sergenti were common visitors of bird nests suggesting an endophagic behavior. A network analysis showed a highly-connected and poorly-specialized network wherein sandflies shared most of the blood source and showed an opportunistic feeding behavior with marked anthropophilia. Our results obtained close to avian nests show that sandfly populations are maintained by various wild animals, which will greatly complicate the management and control of the pathogens they transmit to humans and domestic animals.

Abstract Image

多宿主/多媒介群落网络:鸟类栖息地中白蛉种类和宿主相互作用的分离
确定病媒的摄食行为是了解其传播的传染病流行病学的关键。对于某些宿主-媒介-寄生虫系统,这些信息偏向于人类和家庭周围栖息地,经常低估野生动物的可能作用。此外,对媒介相互作用的研究往往侧重于一对一的宿主-媒介关系,尽管分析多种媒介物种如何与多个宿主相互作用至关重要。这些偏见尤其影响了我们对白蛉的认识,白蛉是利什曼原虫和各种白蛉病毒的主要媒介,很少在非家居栖息地和与各种宿主的多重相互作用中进行探索。为了揭示西班牙半干旱和人口稀少地区白蛉的多宿主/多媒介网络,我们采用疾病控制中心(CDC)和粘捕法(CDC)两种诱捕方法对靠近鸟类巢穴的白蛉群落进行了3年的采样,并确定了所有吸血白蛉的血食来源。共检出6种白蛉,其中以白蛉、白蛉和细尾蛇尾最为丰富。我们确定了13种血源物种,人类是最常见的一种,其次是Coracias garrulus(欧洲滚子)和Sus scrofa(可能是野猪)。六种白蛉中有五种主要以野生哺乳动物为食,但也有三种以野生鸟类为食。基于这一分析,瑟氏白蛉只以鸟类为食。papatasi白蛉和sergenti P.是鸟巢的常见访客,表明它们有自食行为。网络分析表明,白蛉在一个高度连接但专业化程度较低的网络中共享大部分血源,并表现出机会主义的进食行为,具有明显的嗜人性。我们在鸟类巢穴附近获得的结果表明,白蛉种群是由多种野生动物维持的,这将极大地复杂化它们传播给人类和家畜的病原体的管理和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases 农林科学-传染病学
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
350
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions): Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread. Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope. Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies. Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies). Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信