J. Veiga, F. Collantes, L. M. Hernández-Triana, S. W. J. Prosser, F. Valera
{"title":"Multihost/Multivector Community Network: Disentangling Sandfly Species and Host Interactions in Avian Habitats","authors":"J. Veiga, F. Collantes, L. M. Hernández-Triana, S. W. J. Prosser, F. Valera","doi":"10.1155/tbed/9259030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Ascertaining the feeding behavior of vectors is a key for understanding epidemiology of the infections they transmit. For some host–vector–parasite systems, this information is biased towards human and peridomestic habitats, frequently underestimating the likely role of wildlife. In addition, studies on vector interactions often focus on a one-to-one host–vector relationship, even though it is crucial to analyze how multiple vector species interact with multiple hosts. These biases particularly affect our knowledge of sandflies, the main vector of <i>Leishmania</i> spp. and various phleboviruses, that are rarely explored in non-peridomestic habitats and in the context of multiple interactions with various hosts. To reveal the multihost/multivector network involving phlebotomine sandflies in a semiarid and poorly populated area of Spain, we sampled the sandfly community close to avian nests by means of two trapping methods (Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and sticky traps) during 3 years and identified the blood-meal source of all engorged sandflies. We detected six phlebotomine species with <i>Phlebotomus perniciosus</i>, <i>P. papatasi</i>, and <i>Sergentomyia minuta</i> being the most abundant ones. We identified 13 blood source species, with humans being the most common one, followed by <i>Coracias garrulus</i> (European roller) and <i>Sus scrofa</i> (likely wild boar). Five of the six sandfly species fed largely on wild mammals, although, three also fed on wild birds. <i>Phlebotomus sergenti</i> only fed on birds based on this analysis. <i>Phlebotomus papatasi</i> and <i>P. sergenti</i> were common visitors of bird nests suggesting an endophagic behavior. A network analysis showed a highly-connected and poorly-specialized network wherein sandflies shared most of the blood source and showed an opportunistic feeding behavior with marked anthropophilia. Our results obtained close to avian nests show that sandfly populations are maintained by various wild animals, which will greatly complicate the management and control of the pathogens they transmit to humans and domestic animals.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":234,"journal":{"name":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/tbed/9259030","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transboundary and Emerging Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/tbed/9259030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ascertaining the feeding behavior of vectors is a key for understanding epidemiology of the infections they transmit. For some host–vector–parasite systems, this information is biased towards human and peridomestic habitats, frequently underestimating the likely role of wildlife. In addition, studies on vector interactions often focus on a one-to-one host–vector relationship, even though it is crucial to analyze how multiple vector species interact with multiple hosts. These biases particularly affect our knowledge of sandflies, the main vector of Leishmania spp. and various phleboviruses, that are rarely explored in non-peridomestic habitats and in the context of multiple interactions with various hosts. To reveal the multihost/multivector network involving phlebotomine sandflies in a semiarid and poorly populated area of Spain, we sampled the sandfly community close to avian nests by means of two trapping methods (Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and sticky traps) during 3 years and identified the blood-meal source of all engorged sandflies. We detected six phlebotomine species with Phlebotomus perniciosus, P. papatasi, and Sergentomyia minuta being the most abundant ones. We identified 13 blood source species, with humans being the most common one, followed by Coracias garrulus (European roller) and Sus scrofa (likely wild boar). Five of the six sandfly species fed largely on wild mammals, although, three also fed on wild birds. Phlebotomus sergenti only fed on birds based on this analysis. Phlebotomus papatasi and P. sergenti were common visitors of bird nests suggesting an endophagic behavior. A network analysis showed a highly-connected and poorly-specialized network wherein sandflies shared most of the blood source and showed an opportunistic feeding behavior with marked anthropophilia. Our results obtained close to avian nests show that sandfly populations are maintained by various wild animals, which will greatly complicate the management and control of the pathogens they transmit to humans and domestic animals.
期刊介绍:
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases brings together in one place the latest research on infectious diseases considered to hold the greatest economic threat to animals and humans worldwide. The journal provides a venue for global research on their diagnosis, prevention and management, and for papers on public health, pathogenesis, epidemiology, statistical modeling, diagnostics, biosecurity issues, genomics, vaccine development and rapid communication of new outbreaks. Papers should include timely research approaches using state-of-the-art technologies. The editors encourage papers adopting a science-based approach on socio-economic and environmental factors influencing the management of the bio-security threat posed by these diseases, including risk analysis and disease spread modeling. Preference will be given to communications focusing on novel science-based approaches to controlling transboundary and emerging diseases. The following topics are generally considered out-of-scope, but decisions are made on a case-by-case basis (for example, studies on cryptic wildlife populations, and those on potential species extinctions):
Pathogen discovery: a common pathogen newly recognised in a specific country, or a new pathogen or genetic sequence for which there is little context about — or insights regarding — its emergence or spread.
Prevalence estimation surveys and risk factor studies based on survey (rather than longitudinal) methodology, except when such studies are unique. Surveys of knowledge, attitudes and practices are within scope.
Diagnostic test development if not accompanied by robust sensitivity and specificity estimation from field studies.
Studies focused only on laboratory methods in which relevance to disease emergence and spread is not obvious or can not be inferred (“pure research” type studies).
Narrative literature reviews which do not generate new knowledge. Systematic and scoping reviews, and meta-analyses are within scope.