Co-occurrence in snake and lizard sister species is unrelated to major ecomorphological traits

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
A. Shinde, T. J. Davies, U. Roll, S. Meiri
{"title":"Co-occurrence in snake and lizard sister species is unrelated to major ecomorphological traits","authors":"A. Shinde,&nbsp;T. J. Davies,&nbsp;U. Roll,&nbsp;S. Meiri","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Environmental factors and interspecific interactions, such as competition and facilitation, can shape species' geographic ranges. Here, we tested the relationship between geographic range overlap of squamate sister species, and their divergence in body size, diel activity, and microhabitat use. Competition theory predicts that sister species with similar traits will overlap less geographically than sister pairs with dissimilar traits. However, similar distributions may present similar selective pressures and favour similar adaptations, such that habitat filtering may result in species with more similar traits in sympatry. Across 1434 sister species contrasts, we found little relationship between range overlap and niche divergence. In some models, the divergence in body size and microhabitat use marginally increased with sympatry, while in other models, sympatric sisters had similar activity times. However, the low <i>R</i>-squared values of almost all these models lend only weak support to predictions from competition or habitat filtering theories. Sympatric sister species within the same biome showed more similar activity times than expected, lending some support to habitat filtering. Niche divergence in allopatry or sympatry, as calculated using a multi-trait dissimilarity index, did not show a phylogenetic signal, and niches of sister species from different squamate clades did not deviate significantly from the null expectation. Overall, niche divergence or convergence, across the axes we explored, is not a prerequisite for regional species co-occurrence. We suggest here that the lack of consistent support for either limiting similarity or habitat filtering may reflect that both these forces act as transient phenomena. More fine-grained analyses, in space and time, would be needed to detect their fingerprints. Thus, coexistence in the face of competition can arise due to various evolutionary and biogeographic mechanisms, acting concurrently or asynchronously.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"324 4","pages":"298-309"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.13216","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Environmental factors and interspecific interactions, such as competition and facilitation, can shape species' geographic ranges. Here, we tested the relationship between geographic range overlap of squamate sister species, and their divergence in body size, diel activity, and microhabitat use. Competition theory predicts that sister species with similar traits will overlap less geographically than sister pairs with dissimilar traits. However, similar distributions may present similar selective pressures and favour similar adaptations, such that habitat filtering may result in species with more similar traits in sympatry. Across 1434 sister species contrasts, we found little relationship between range overlap and niche divergence. In some models, the divergence in body size and microhabitat use marginally increased with sympatry, while in other models, sympatric sisters had similar activity times. However, the low R-squared values of almost all these models lend only weak support to predictions from competition or habitat filtering theories. Sympatric sister species within the same biome showed more similar activity times than expected, lending some support to habitat filtering. Niche divergence in allopatry or sympatry, as calculated using a multi-trait dissimilarity index, did not show a phylogenetic signal, and niches of sister species from different squamate clades did not deviate significantly from the null expectation. Overall, niche divergence or convergence, across the axes we explored, is not a prerequisite for regional species co-occurrence. We suggest here that the lack of consistent support for either limiting similarity or habitat filtering may reflect that both these forces act as transient phenomena. More fine-grained analyses, in space and time, would be needed to detect their fingerprints. Thus, coexistence in the face of competition can arise due to various evolutionary and biogeographic mechanisms, acting concurrently or asynchronously.

Abstract Image

蛇和蜥蜴姐妹种的共生现象与主要的生态形态特征无关
环境因素和种间相互作用(如竞争和促进)会影响物种的地理分布。在这里,我们测试了有鳞类姊妹物种的地理分布重叠与它们在体型、日间活动和微生境利用方面的差异之间的关系。根据竞争理论的预测,性状相似的姊妹物种与性状不同的姊妹物种相比,地理重叠程度较低。然而,相似的分布可能会带来相似的选择压力,并有利于相似的适应性,因此栖息地过滤可能会导致具有更多相似特征的物种共生。在 1434 个姊妹物种对比中,我们发现分布区重叠与生态位差异之间的关系不大。在一些模型中,体型和微生境利用的差异随着同域性的增加而略有增加,而在另一些模型中,同域姐妹物种的活动时间相似。然而,几乎所有这些模型的R平方值都很低,只能为竞争或栖息地过滤理论的预测提供微弱的支持。同一生物群落中的同域姊妹物种的活动时间比预期的更相似,这在一定程度上支持了生境过滤理论。使用多特征差异指数计算的异地或同地生态位差异没有显示出系统发育信号,来自不同有鳞类支系的姊妹物种的生态位也没有明显偏离空期望值。总体而言,在我们探讨的各轴上,生态位的差异或趋同并不是区域物种共存的先决条件。我们在此认为,限制相似性或栖息地过滤缺乏一致的支持可能反映了这两种力量都是瞬时现象。需要在空间和时间上进行更精细的分析,才能发现它们的蛛丝马迹。因此,竞争中的共存可能是由于各种进化和生物地理学机制同时或非同步作用而产生的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信