Evaluating effects of natural and anthropogenic factors on American black bear occupancy in northern Georgia, USA

IF 1.9 3区 生物学 Q1 ZOOLOGY
J. B. Myers, S. Perea, K. L. Johannsen, E. Rushton, L. M. Conner, S. B. Castleberry
{"title":"Evaluating effects of natural and anthropogenic factors on American black bear occupancy in northern Georgia, USA","authors":"J. B. Myers,&nbsp;S. Perea,&nbsp;K. L. Johannsen,&nbsp;E. Rushton,&nbsp;L. M. Conner,&nbsp;S. B. Castleberry","doi":"10.1111/jzo.13215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although previously close to extirpation in the southeastern United States, American black bear (<i>Ursus americanus</i>) abundance and distribution have increased with habitat management and harvest regulation. The north Georgia black bear population, the most abundant and widely distributed in the state, is currently being exposed to pressures from increasing anthropogenic disturbances, such as recreation and vehicle traffic. We evaluated the effects of environmental factors and anthropogenic activity on habitat use of black bears within a wildlife management area open to public recreation. We used detection/non-detection data from camera surveys conducted at 448 locations from April to December 2023 to fit hierarchical single-species occupancy models. Black bear detection was best explained by Julian date, its quadratic effect, and weekly human activity index. Detection increased through the spring, peaked in June, and declined throughout late summer and fall. In contrast to detection, occupancy was not affected by seasonal differences in black bear activity. Occupancy increased with increasing elevation, distance to water, and distance to high-use recreation areas. The spatial distribution of food resources likely contributed to the observed black bear occupancy pattern related to elevation and distance to water, while human disturbance in the study area also influenced black bear occupancy. Thus, our results suggest that in a landscape open to public recreation, black bear occupancy was driven by a combination of environmental and anthropogenic factors. Identifying patterns of occupancy at a scale typical of management provides important information for managing black bear populations throughout the large, connected network of national forests in the Appalachian region.</p>","PeriodicalId":17600,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Zoology","volume":"324 4","pages":"287-297"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jzo.13215","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jzo.13215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although previously close to extirpation in the southeastern United States, American black bear (Ursus americanus) abundance and distribution have increased with habitat management and harvest regulation. The north Georgia black bear population, the most abundant and widely distributed in the state, is currently being exposed to pressures from increasing anthropogenic disturbances, such as recreation and vehicle traffic. We evaluated the effects of environmental factors and anthropogenic activity on habitat use of black bears within a wildlife management area open to public recreation. We used detection/non-detection data from camera surveys conducted at 448 locations from April to December 2023 to fit hierarchical single-species occupancy models. Black bear detection was best explained by Julian date, its quadratic effect, and weekly human activity index. Detection increased through the spring, peaked in June, and declined throughout late summer and fall. In contrast to detection, occupancy was not affected by seasonal differences in black bear activity. Occupancy increased with increasing elevation, distance to water, and distance to high-use recreation areas. The spatial distribution of food resources likely contributed to the observed black bear occupancy pattern related to elevation and distance to water, while human disturbance in the study area also influenced black bear occupancy. Thus, our results suggest that in a landscape open to public recreation, black bear occupancy was driven by a combination of environmental and anthropogenic factors. Identifying patterns of occupancy at a scale typical of management provides important information for managing black bear populations throughout the large, connected network of national forests in the Appalachian region.

Abstract Image

自然和人为因素对美国乔治亚州北部黑熊居住的影响评价
尽管美洲黑熊(Ursus americanus)以前在美国东南部濒临灭绝,但随着栖息地管理和捕猎法规的实施,其数量和分布范围都有所增加。佐治亚州北部的黑熊种群是该州数量最多、分布最广的种群,目前正面临着日益增加的人为干扰(如娱乐和车辆交通)带来的压力。我们评估了环境因素和人为活动对黑熊在一个向公众开放的野生动物管理区内栖息地利用的影响。我们利用 2023 年 4 月至 12 月期间在 448 个地点进行的摄像调查所获得的探测/未探测数据来拟合分层单物种占用模型。朱利安日期、其二次效应和每周人类活动指数最能解释黑熊的探测情况。黑熊的探测率在整个春季都在上升,在 6 月份达到峰值,并在整个夏末和秋季下降。与探测结果相反,黑熊活动的季节性差异并不影响黑熊的占据率。随着海拔高度、水源距离和与高使用率娱乐区的距离增加,黑熊的占据率也在增加。食物资源的空间分布可能促成了观察到的与海拔高度和水源距离相关的黑熊栖息模式,而研究区域的人类干扰也影响了黑熊的栖息。因此,我们的研究结果表明,在一个向公众开放的娱乐景观中,黑熊的占据是由环境和人为因素共同驱动的。在典型的管理尺度上识别黑熊的栖息模式,为管理阿巴拉契亚地区庞大而相连的国家森林网络中的黑熊种群提供了重要信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Zoology
Journal of Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Zoology publishes high-quality research papers that are original and are of broad interest. The Editors seek studies that are hypothesis-driven and interdisciplinary in nature. Papers on animal behaviour, ecology, physiology, anatomy, developmental biology, evolution, systematics, genetics and genomics will be considered; research that explores the interface between these disciplines is strongly encouraged. Studies dealing with geographically and/or taxonomically restricted topics should test general hypotheses, describe novel findings or have broad implications. The Journal of Zoology aims to maintain an effective but fair peer-review process that recognises research quality as a combination of the relevance, approach and execution of a research study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信