Can biostimulants and tillage rotations improve dryland crop productivity and soil microbes?

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Flackson Tshuma, James Bennett, Pieter Andreas Swanepoel, Johan Labuschagne, Stephan van der Westhuizen, Francis Rayns
{"title":"Can biostimulants and tillage rotations improve dryland crop productivity and soil microbes?","authors":"Flackson Tshuma,&nbsp;James Bennett,&nbsp;Pieter Andreas Swanepoel,&nbsp;Johan Labuschagne,&nbsp;Stephan van der Westhuizen,&nbsp;Francis Rayns","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil microbes are essential for soil nutrient cycling. However, frequent tillage and the use of synthetic agrochemicals can reduce soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity. In this study, the effects of four tillage treatments (mouldboard plough, shallow tine-tillage, no-tillage, and tillage rotation) and two rates of synthetic agrochemicals (standard and reduced, with biostimulants) on soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity were investigated between 2018 and 2020 in a Mediterranean climate zone in South Africa. It was hypothesized that a reduction in tillage frequency and quantity of synthetic agrochemical application would lead to greater microbial diversity and enzyme activity. Soil samples were collected from the 0- to 150-mm layer of a field trial under a dryland crop rotation system. Soil microbial species richness and abundance were assessed using the Shannon–Wiener diversity and evenness indices. The activities of four microbial enzymes—β-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease—were used to evaluate ecosystem functioning. The combined effects of tillage rotation with a shallow tine implement and the application of biostimulants failed to significantly improve soil microbial diversity, enzyme activity, and crop productivity relative to other treatments. However, the combination did not reduce the wheat (<i>Triticum aestivum</i>) grain yield and quality, and soil biological parameters. Furthermore, the less intensive tillage treatments, ST, NT, and ST-NT-NT-NT, resulted in higher enzyme activity than the mouldboard treatment. Therefore, we suggest that combining non-intensive tillage with reduced synthetic agrochemical use can be a safer, more environmentally friendly alternative to intensive tillage and high agrochemical application in dryland cropping systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21738","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21738","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil microbes are essential for soil nutrient cycling. However, frequent tillage and the use of synthetic agrochemicals can reduce soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity. In this study, the effects of four tillage treatments (mouldboard plough, shallow tine-tillage, no-tillage, and tillage rotation) and two rates of synthetic agrochemicals (standard and reduced, with biostimulants) on soil microbial diversity and enzyme activity were investigated between 2018 and 2020 in a Mediterranean climate zone in South Africa. It was hypothesized that a reduction in tillage frequency and quantity of synthetic agrochemical application would lead to greater microbial diversity and enzyme activity. Soil samples were collected from the 0- to 150-mm layer of a field trial under a dryland crop rotation system. Soil microbial species richness and abundance were assessed using the Shannon–Wiener diversity and evenness indices. The activities of four microbial enzymes—β-glucosidase, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, and urease—were used to evaluate ecosystem functioning. The combined effects of tillage rotation with a shallow tine implement and the application of biostimulants failed to significantly improve soil microbial diversity, enzyme activity, and crop productivity relative to other treatments. However, the combination did not reduce the wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain yield and quality, and soil biological parameters. Furthermore, the less intensive tillage treatments, ST, NT, and ST-NT-NT-NT, resulted in higher enzyme activity than the mouldboard treatment. Therefore, we suggest that combining non-intensive tillage with reduced synthetic agrochemical use can be a safer, more environmentally friendly alternative to intensive tillage and high agrochemical application in dryland cropping systems.

Abstract Image

生物刺激剂和轮作能提高旱地作物生产力和土壤微生物吗?
土壤微生物对土壤养分循环至关重要。然而,频繁耕作和使用合成农药会降低土壤微生物多样性和酶活性。在这项研究中,在2018年至2020年期间,研究了南非地中海气候区四种耕作方式(板耕、浅耕、免耕和轮作)和两种合成农药(标准和减少,使用生物刺激剂)对土壤微生物多样性和酶活性的影响。据推测,减少耕作频率和合成农用化学品施用的数量将导致更大的微生物多样性和酶活性。在旱地作物轮作制度下,从田间试验的0- 150毫米土层收集土壤样品。采用Shannon-Wiener多样性指数和均匀度指数评价土壤微生物物种丰富度和丰度。采用β-葡萄糖苷酶、酸性磷酸酶、碱性磷酸酶和尿素酶4种微生物酶活性评价生态系统功能。与其他处理相比,浅耕轮作和施用生物刺激素的联合效应未能显著改善土壤微生物多样性、酶活性和作物生产力。但对小麦(Triticum aestivum)的产量、品质及土壤生物参数均无显著影响。此外,低强度耕作处理(ST、NT和ST-NT-NT-NT -NT)的酶活性高于模板处理。因此,我们建议将非集约耕作与减少合成农用化学品的使用相结合,可以成为旱地耕作系统中集约耕作和大量使用农用化学品的一种更安全、更环保的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信