Evaluation of the Maximum Evaporation and the Priestley-Taylor Models for Inland Waterbodies

IF 3.8 2区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Wei Xiao, Jun Wang, Ruonan Zhao, Lei Jia, Haoran Chu, Hengxin Bao, Chang Cao, Pei Ge, Jian Yang, Mi Zhang, Zhen Zhang, Xuhui Lee
{"title":"Evaluation of the Maximum Evaporation and the Priestley-Taylor Models for Inland Waterbodies","authors":"Wei Xiao,&nbsp;Jun Wang,&nbsp;Ruonan Zhao,&nbsp;Lei Jia,&nbsp;Haoran Chu,&nbsp;Hengxin Bao,&nbsp;Chang Cao,&nbsp;Pei Ge,&nbsp;Jian Yang,&nbsp;Mi Zhang,&nbsp;Zhen Zhang,&nbsp;Xuhui Lee","doi":"10.1029/2024JD041071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Priestley-Taylor (PT) model is a classic model of potential evaporation of terrestrial and marine surfaces. It is now recognized that the Bowen ratio (<i>β</i>) implicit in the PT model is too sensitive to temperature. The model also requires the surface net radiation (<i>R</i><sub>n</sub>) as input even though <i>R</i><sub>n</sub> is not an independent external forcing. The maximum evaporation model (MEM) proposed by Yang and Roderick (2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3481) is a potential candidate for replacing the PT model. Past studies have evaluated the MEM for land ecosystems and for the global ocean. This study represents the first evaluation of the MEM for inland waterbodies. Results are based on eddy-covariance observation at a large lake and at a small fishpond. Although there were complex error structures and error compensation patterns among its intermediate variables, the MEM was able to reproduce the observed monthly (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.95) and interannual variability (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.78) in the lake latent heat flux. A key assumption of the MEM, that the incoming and outgoing longwave radiation is coupled, was a reasonable approximation at both the monthly and the annual time scale for the large lake and at the monthly time scale for the small fishpond. This assumption allows the MEM to treat <i>R</i><sub>n</sub> as an intermediate variable instead of a prescribed forcing. These results support the MEM as an alternative to the PT model at locations where <i>R</i><sub>n</sub> measurements are not available. In situations where <i>R</i><sub>n</sub> data is available, a revised PT model with reduced <i>β</i> temperature sensitivity is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","volume":"129 24","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD041071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Priestley-Taylor (PT) model is a classic model of potential evaporation of terrestrial and marine surfaces. It is now recognized that the Bowen ratio (β) implicit in the PT model is too sensitive to temperature. The model also requires the surface net radiation (Rn) as input even though Rn is not an independent external forcing. The maximum evaporation model (MEM) proposed by Yang and Roderick (2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3481) is a potential candidate for replacing the PT model. Past studies have evaluated the MEM for land ecosystems and for the global ocean. This study represents the first evaluation of the MEM for inland waterbodies. Results are based on eddy-covariance observation at a large lake and at a small fishpond. Although there were complex error structures and error compensation patterns among its intermediate variables, the MEM was able to reproduce the observed monthly (R2 > 0.95) and interannual variability (R2 > 0.78) in the lake latent heat flux. A key assumption of the MEM, that the incoming and outgoing longwave radiation is coupled, was a reasonable approximation at both the monthly and the annual time scale for the large lake and at the monthly time scale for the small fishpond. This assumption allows the MEM to treat Rn as an intermediate variable instead of a prescribed forcing. These results support the MEM as an alternative to the PT model at locations where Rn measurements are not available. In situations where Rn data is available, a revised PT model with reduced β temperature sensitivity is recommended.

评估内陆水体的最大蒸发量和普利斯特里-泰勒模型
Priestley-Taylor (PT)模型是陆地和海洋表面潜在蒸发的经典模型。现在人们认识到,PT模型中隐含的波温比(β)对温度过于敏感。该模型还需要地表净辐射(Rn)作为输入,尽管Rn不是一个独立的外部强迫。Yang和Roderick (2019, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3481)提出的最大蒸发模型(MEM)是替代PT模型的潜在候选模型。过去的研究已经评估了陆地生态系统和全球海洋的MEM。本研究首次对内陆水体的MEM进行了评价。结果是基于一个大湖泊和一个小鱼塘的涡旋协方差观测。虽然其中间变量之间存在复杂的误差结构和误差补偿模式,但MEM能够再现观测到的月(R2 >;0.95)和年际变率(R2 >;0.78)。MEM的一个关键假设,即输入和输出的长波辐射是耦合的,在大湖泊的月和年时间尺度以及小鱼塘的月时间尺度上都是一个合理的近似值。这一假设允许MEM将Rn作为一个中间变量,而不是一个规定的强迫。这些结果支持MEM在没有Rn测量的地方作为PT模型的替代方案。在有Rn数据的情况下,建议采用降低β温度敏感性的修正PT模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
11.40%
发文量
684
期刊介绍: JGR: Atmospheres publishes articles that advance and improve understanding of atmospheric properties and processes, including the interaction of the atmosphere with other components of the Earth system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信