Understorey vegetation response to post-tornado salvage logging

IF 2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Colby Bosley-Smith, Anthony W. D'Amato, Nicole S. Rogers, Nava Tabak, Shawn Fraver
{"title":"Understorey vegetation response to post-tornado salvage logging","authors":"Colby Bosley-Smith,&nbsp;Anthony W. D'Amato,&nbsp;Nicole S. Rogers,&nbsp;Nava Tabak,&nbsp;Shawn Fraver","doi":"10.1111/avsc.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Questions</h3>\n \n <p>How does salvage logging alter understorey vegetation composition? To what extent does abundance of recalcitrant understorey species influence conifer tree regeneration? How does salvage logging influence microclimate conditions?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Scientific Forest Management Area, Baxter State Park, Maine, USA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In 2013, a rare tornado and subsequent salvage operation created three clear “treatments” for evaluation of post-disturbance understorey community response: blowdown, blowdown followed by salvage logging and an undisturbed forested control. Ten years post tornado, we inventoried understorey vegetation at 10 sampling points within each of these treatments. We installed automated sensors to track temperature and soil moisture throughout a growing season and used hemispherical photographs to characterize canopy openness.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination based on species importance values indicated distinct species groupings according to treatment, with the salvage treatment supporting a higher abundance of the recalcitrant species, <i>Rubus idaeus</i> and <i>Pteridium aquilinum</i>. Abundance of conifer regeneration was notably lower in areas with high abundance of <i>Rubus idaeus</i> or <i>Pteridium aquilinum</i>. Daily soil surface temperature fluctuations and canopy openness (both factors that influence seed germination) decreased in the order salvage &gt; blowdown &gt; control. Ordination results suggest that these two factors were the primary drivers of the observed compositional differences.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study furthers our understanding of the interactions among disturbance, microclimate, and understorey communities, highlighting the need for increased consideration of long-term effects on vegetation development following salvage logging. Our findings support recommendations to intermingle salvage patches within blowdown areas to promote landscape heterogeneity and species diversity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55494,"journal":{"name":"Applied Vegetation Science","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Vegetation Science","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/avsc.70006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Questions

How does salvage logging alter understorey vegetation composition? To what extent does abundance of recalcitrant understorey species influence conifer tree regeneration? How does salvage logging influence microclimate conditions?

Location

Scientific Forest Management Area, Baxter State Park, Maine, USA.

Methods

In 2013, a rare tornado and subsequent salvage operation created three clear “treatments” for evaluation of post-disturbance understorey community response: blowdown, blowdown followed by salvage logging and an undisturbed forested control. Ten years post tornado, we inventoried understorey vegetation at 10 sampling points within each of these treatments. We installed automated sensors to track temperature and soil moisture throughout a growing season and used hemispherical photographs to characterize canopy openness.

Results

Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination based on species importance values indicated distinct species groupings according to treatment, with the salvage treatment supporting a higher abundance of the recalcitrant species, Rubus idaeus and Pteridium aquilinum. Abundance of conifer regeneration was notably lower in areas with high abundance of Rubus idaeus or Pteridium aquilinum. Daily soil surface temperature fluctuations and canopy openness (both factors that influence seed germination) decreased in the order salvage > blowdown > control. Ordination results suggest that these two factors were the primary drivers of the observed compositional differences.

Conclusions

This study furthers our understanding of the interactions among disturbance, microclimate, and understorey communities, highlighting the need for increased consideration of long-term effects on vegetation development following salvage logging. Our findings support recommendations to intermingle salvage patches within blowdown areas to promote landscape heterogeneity and species diversity.

下层植被对龙卷风后采伐的响应
问题 抢救性砍伐如何改变林下植被组成?顽固的林下物种的丰度在多大程度上影响针叶树的再生?抢救性采伐如何影响小气候条件? 地点 美国缅因州巴克斯特州立公园科学森林管理区。 方法 2013 年,一场罕见的龙卷风和随后的抢救性采伐行动为评估扰动后林下群落的反应创造了三种明确的 "处理":吹伐、吹伐后再进行抢救性采伐以及未受扰动的森林对照。龙卷风过后十年,我们在每个处理中的 10 个取样点对林下植被进行了调查。我们安装了自动传感器来跟踪整个生长季节的温度和土壤湿度,并使用半球照片来描述树冠开阔度。 结果 基于物种重要度值的非计量多维标度(NMDS)排序表明,不同处理的物种组别各不相同,抢救性处理支持较高丰度的顽固物种--Rubus idaeus 和 Pteridium aquilinum。在茜草和蕨类植物较多的地区,针叶树再生的丰度明显较低。土壤表面的日温度波动和树冠开阔度(这两个因素都会影响种子萌发)按照抢救> 吹倒> 控制的顺序降低。排序结果表明,这两个因素是造成所观察到的成分差异的主要原因。 结论 本研究进一步加深了我们对干扰、小气候和林下群落之间相互作用的理解,强调了需要更多地考虑抢救性采伐后对植被发展的长期影响。我们的研究结果支持在吹伐区内将抢救性修补斑块混合在一起以促进景观异质性和物种多样性的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Vegetation Science
Applied Vegetation Science 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
67
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Applied Vegetation Science focuses on community-level topics relevant to human interaction with vegetation, including global change, nature conservation, nature management, restoration of plant communities and of natural habitats, and the planning of semi-natural and urban landscapes. Vegetation survey, modelling and remote-sensing applications are welcome. Papers on vegetation science which do not fit to this scope (do not have an applied aspect and are not vegetation survey) should be directed to our associate journal, the Journal of Vegetation Science. Both journals publish papers on the ecology of a single species only if it plays a key role in structuring plant communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信