Addressing the Unmet Need in the Treatment of Poststroke Anxiety, Depression, and Apathy: A Systematic Review of Potential Therapeutic Options

Yuanchen Liang, Christopher Levi, Perminder S. Sachdev, Neil Spratt, Beata Bajorek
{"title":"Addressing the Unmet Need in the Treatment of Poststroke Anxiety, Depression, and Apathy: A Systematic Review of Potential Therapeutic Options","authors":"Yuanchen Liang,&nbsp;Christopher Levi,&nbsp;Perminder S. Sachdev,&nbsp;Neil Spratt,&nbsp;Beata Bajorek","doi":"10.1002/mhs2.93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Half of stroke patients experience depression, anxiety, and/or apathy, adversely impacting poststroke recovery. Yet management of these remains suboptimal. To identify the broad spectrum of therapeutic modalities investigated for post-stroke mood disorders, and their characteristics, administration regimens, and clinical outcomes. A structured, PRISMA-guided literature review identified studies exploring preventative or treatment options. Seventy-one identified studies (<i>N</i> = 5748 patients) comprised 62 clinical trials, 4 case reports, and 4 protocols or published abstracts. Most focused on depression; relatively few addressed anxiety and/or apathy. Overall, the efficacy of most treatments remains unclear due to the diversity and small size of studies (mostly pilot studies) precluding comparison. Preventative modalities such as nortriptyline (6 studies) reduced the incidence of depression, noting high rates of effectiveness in smaller studies (92.3%, study <i>N</i> = 48) patients. For the treatment of diagnosed mood disorders (58 studies), conventional pharmacotherapies (e.g., fluoxetine) were most effective, reducing depression, anxiety and/or apathy in up to 95.8% of patients (study <i>N</i> = 60). Physiological interventions (e.g., repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, rTMS) variably reduced depression/anxiety severity (in 20.8%–93.3% of patients) whilst complementary therapies (e.g., acupuncture) reduced depression/anxiety severity in 60.0%–92.4% of patients (study <i>N</i> = 60). Combination therapies (e.g., fluoxetine plus acupuncture or rTMS plus Deanixt) significantly reduced depression severity in 93.3% of patients (study <i>N</i> = 60). Within the limited evidence in poststroke mood disorders, conventional pharmacotherapies appear most effective for both prevention and treatment, whilst nonpharmacological strategies and CAMs show potential. No treatment can be fully recommended without more robust trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94140,"journal":{"name":"Mental health science","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mhs2.93","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mental health science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mhs2.93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Half of stroke patients experience depression, anxiety, and/or apathy, adversely impacting poststroke recovery. Yet management of these remains suboptimal. To identify the broad spectrum of therapeutic modalities investigated for post-stroke mood disorders, and their characteristics, administration regimens, and clinical outcomes. A structured, PRISMA-guided literature review identified studies exploring preventative or treatment options. Seventy-one identified studies (N = 5748 patients) comprised 62 clinical trials, 4 case reports, and 4 protocols or published abstracts. Most focused on depression; relatively few addressed anxiety and/or apathy. Overall, the efficacy of most treatments remains unclear due to the diversity and small size of studies (mostly pilot studies) precluding comparison. Preventative modalities such as nortriptyline (6 studies) reduced the incidence of depression, noting high rates of effectiveness in smaller studies (92.3%, study N = 48) patients. For the treatment of diagnosed mood disorders (58 studies), conventional pharmacotherapies (e.g., fluoxetine) were most effective, reducing depression, anxiety and/or apathy in up to 95.8% of patients (study N = 60). Physiological interventions (e.g., repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, rTMS) variably reduced depression/anxiety severity (in 20.8%–93.3% of patients) whilst complementary therapies (e.g., acupuncture) reduced depression/anxiety severity in 60.0%–92.4% of patients (study N = 60). Combination therapies (e.g., fluoxetine plus acupuncture or rTMS plus Deanixt) significantly reduced depression severity in 93.3% of patients (study N = 60). Within the limited evidence in poststroke mood disorders, conventional pharmacotherapies appear most effective for both prevention and treatment, whilst nonpharmacological strategies and CAMs show potential. No treatment can be fully recommended without more robust trials.

Abstract Image

解决中风后焦虑、抑郁和冷漠治疗中尚未满足的需求:潜在治疗方案的系统回顾
半数中风患者会出现抑郁、焦虑和/或冷漠,对中风后的恢复造成不利影响。然而,对这些症状的处理仍然不够理想。为了确定针对中风后情绪障碍的广泛治疗模式,以及它们的特点、给药方案和临床结果。通过结构化、PRISMA 引导的文献综述,确定了探讨预防或治疗方案的研究。确定的 71 项研究(N = 5748 例患者)包括 62 项临床试验、4 项病例报告和 4 项方案或发表的摘要。大多数研究侧重于抑郁症;相对较少的研究涉及焦虑和/或冷漠。总体而言,由于研究的多样性和规模较小(大多为试验性研究),大多数治疗方法的疗效仍不明确,无法进行比较。去甲替林等预防性疗法(6 项研究)降低了抑郁症的发病率,在较小规模的研究中,患者的有效率较高(92.3%,研究 N = 48)。对于已确诊的情绪障碍的治疗(58 项研究),传统药物疗法(如氟西汀)最为有效,可减少多达 95.8% 患者的抑郁、焦虑和/或冷漠情绪(研究 N = 60)。生理干预(如重复经颅磁刺激)可在不同程度上减轻抑郁/焦虑的严重程度(20.8%-93.3%的患者),而辅助疗法(如针灸)可在60.0%-92.4%的患者中减轻抑郁/焦虑的严重程度(研究人数=60)。联合疗法(如氟西汀加针灸或经颅磁刺激加迪尼克斯特)可显著降低93.3%患者的抑郁严重程度(研究人数=60)。在卒中后情绪障碍的有限证据中,传统药物疗法似乎对预防和治疗最为有效,而非药物疗法和 CAMs 则显示出潜力。在没有更多可靠试验的情况下,不能完全推荐任何治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信