Daniel Nyuin Alfred Damu, Alvin Guo Jian Lee, Slyvester Yew Wang Chai, Lock Hei Ngu
求助PDF
{"title":"Accelerated weathering of construction-grade limestone for CO2 absorption","authors":"Daniel Nyuin Alfred Damu, Alvin Guo Jian Lee, Slyvester Yew Wang Chai, Lock Hei Ngu","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accelerated weathering of limestone (AWL) process efficiently captures CO<sub>2</sub> from point source emissions. However, despite achieving an outstanding capture efficiency of 73.51 %, lab-grade (LG) limestone with 99.90 % CaCO<sub>3</sub> as an absorbent is costly ($2757.70/t), making commercialization of AWL impractical. This work delves into the viability of utilizing construction-grade (CG) limestone (93.26% purity) for the AWL process facilitated by potable water in an absorption tower for post-combustion capture. The result shows that CG limestone achieves comparable CO<sub>2</sub> capture efficiency of 8.0–74.68% and bicarbonate (Ca(HCO<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>) concentration of 0.63–3.10 mM compared with LG limestone. However, LG limestone has 0.29 mol CO<sub>2</sub>/mol CaCO<sub>3</sub> higher CO<sub>2</sub> absorption capacity and a faster absorption rate than CG limestone, indicating a somewhat better CO<sub>2</sub> capture performance. Nevertheless, CG limestone offered a more cost-effective alternative, with a $2735.24 lower cost per ton of CaCO<sub>3</sub> and a $2651.63 per ton CO<sub>2</sub> lower CO<sub>2</sub> capturing cost at the highest carbon capture efficiency (HCCE) condition compared to LG limestone. The kinetic analysis shows that the forward reactions in the AWL process are significantly faster at elevated CO<sub>2</sub> concentration, with the mass transfer coefficient affirming that CO<sub>2</sub> dissolves faster than CaCO<sub>3</sub>, in line with prior research. Thus, this work validates that CG limestone-based AWL achieves comparable CO<sub>2</sub> capture performance to that of LG limestone, offering a cost-efficient alternative. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"14 6","pages":"1049-1067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Accelerated weathering of limestone (AWL) process efficiently captures CO2 from point source emissions. However, despite achieving an outstanding capture efficiency of 73.51 %, lab-grade (LG) limestone with 99.90 % CaCO3 as an absorbent is costly ($2757.70/t), making commercialization of AWL impractical. This work delves into the viability of utilizing construction-grade (CG) limestone (93.26% purity) for the AWL process facilitated by potable water in an absorption tower for post-combustion capture. The result shows that CG limestone achieves comparable CO2 capture efficiency of 8.0–74.68% and bicarbonate (Ca(HCO3 )2 ) concentration of 0.63–3.10 mM compared with LG limestone. However, LG limestone has 0.29 mol CO2 /mol CaCO3 higher CO2 absorption capacity and a faster absorption rate than CG limestone, indicating a somewhat better CO2 capture performance. Nevertheless, CG limestone offered a more cost-effective alternative, with a $2735.24 lower cost per ton of CaCO3 and a $2651.63 per ton CO2 lower CO2 capturing cost at the highest carbon capture efficiency (HCCE) condition compared to LG limestone. The kinetic analysis shows that the forward reactions in the AWL process are significantly faster at elevated CO2 concentration, with the mass transfer coefficient affirming that CO2 dissolves faster than CaCO3 , in line with prior research. Thus, this work validates that CG limestone-based AWL achieves comparable CO2 capture performance to that of LG limestone, offering a cost-efficient alternative. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
加速建筑级石灰石的风化以吸收二氧化碳
石灰石加速风化(AWL)工艺可从点源排放中有效捕集二氧化碳。然而,尽管实现了 73.51 % 的出色捕集效率,但使用含 99.90 % CaCO3 的实验室级(LG)石灰石作为吸收剂成本高昂(2757.70 美元/吨),使得 AWL 的商业化不切实际。这项研究探讨了利用建筑级(CG)石灰石(纯度为 93.26%)进行燃烧后捕集(AWL)工艺的可行性,在吸收塔中利用饮用水进行燃烧后捕集。结果表明,与 LG 石灰石相比,CG 石灰石的二氧化碳捕集效率为 8.0-74.68%,碳酸氢盐(Ca(HCO3)2)浓度为 0.63-3.10 mM。然而,与 CG 石灰岩相比,LG 石灰岩的二氧化碳吸收能力高 0.29 摩尔 CO2/摩尔 CaCO3,吸收速度快,表明其二氧化碳捕集性能更好。尽管如此,与 LG 石灰岩相比,CG 石灰岩提供了更具成本效益的选择,在最高碳捕集效率(HCCE)条件下,每吨 CaCO3 的成本比 LG 石灰岩低 2735.24 美元,每吨 CO2 的捕集成本比 LG 石灰岩低 2651.63 美元。动力学分析表明,在二氧化碳浓度升高的情况下,AWL 工艺中的正向反应速度明显加快,传质系数证实二氧化碳的溶解速度快于 CaCO3,这与之前的研究结果一致。因此,这项工作验证了基于 CG 石灰石的 AWL 可实现与 LG 石灰石相当的二氧化碳捕集性能,提供了一种具有成本效益的替代方法。© 2024 化学工业协会和约翰威利父子有限公司版权所有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。