Enhancing Histology Detection in MASH Cirrhosis for Artificial Intelligence Pathology Platform by Expert Pathologist Training

Zachary Goodman, Kutbuddin Akbary, Mazen Noureddin, Yayun Ren, Elaine Chng, Dean Tai, Pol Boudes, Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao, Stephen Harrison, Naga Chalasani
{"title":"Enhancing Histology Detection in MASH Cirrhosis for Artificial Intelligence Pathology Platform by Expert Pathologist Training","authors":"Zachary Goodman,&nbsp;Kutbuddin Akbary,&nbsp;Mazen Noureddin,&nbsp;Yayun Ren,&nbsp;Elaine Chng,&nbsp;Dean Tai,&nbsp;Pol Boudes,&nbsp;Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao,&nbsp;Stephen Harrison,&nbsp;Naga Chalasani","doi":"10.1002/lci2.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study addresses the need for precise histopathological assessment of liver biopsies in Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH) cirrhosis, where assessing nuanced drug effects on fibrosis becomes pivotal. The study describes a framework for the development and validation of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model, leveraging SHG/TPE microscopy along with insights from an expert hepatopathologist, to precisely annotate fibrous septa and nodules in liver biopsies in MASH cirrhosis. A total of 25 liver biopsies from the Belapectin trial (NCT04365868) were randomly selected for training, and an additional 10 for validation. Each biopsy underwent three sections: Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA) and Sirius Red (SR) staining for septa and nodule annotation by pathologists and an unstained section for SHG/TPE imaging and AI annotation using qSepta and qNodule algorithms. Re-training of qSepta and qNodule algorithms was executed based on pathologist annotations. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were employed to evaluate concordance with pathologist annotations, both pre- and post-training and during validation. Post-re-training by pathologist annotations, the AI demonstrated improved sensitivity for qSepta annotations, achieving 91% post-training (versus 84% pre-training). Sensitivity for qSepta in the validation cohort also improved to 91%. Additionally, PPV significantly improved from 69% pre-training to 85% post-training and reached 94% during validation. For qNodule annotations, sensitivity increased from 82% post-training to 90% in the validation cohort, while the PPV was consistent at 95% across both training and validation cohorts.This study outlines a strategic framework for developing and validating an AI model tailored for precise histopathological assessment of MASH cirrhosis, using pathologist training and annotations. The outcomes emphasise the crucial role of disease-specific customisation of AI models, based on expert pathologist training, in improving accuracy and applicability in clinical trials, marking a step forward in understanding and addressing the histopathological evaluation of MASH cirrhosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93331,"journal":{"name":"Liver cancer international","volume":"5 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lci2.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver cancer international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lci2.70007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses the need for precise histopathological assessment of liver biopsies in Metabolic dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH) cirrhosis, where assessing nuanced drug effects on fibrosis becomes pivotal. The study describes a framework for the development and validation of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model, leveraging SHG/TPE microscopy along with insights from an expert hepatopathologist, to precisely annotate fibrous septa and nodules in liver biopsies in MASH cirrhosis. A total of 25 liver biopsies from the Belapectin trial (NCT04365868) were randomly selected for training, and an additional 10 for validation. Each biopsy underwent three sections: Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA) and Sirius Red (SR) staining for septa and nodule annotation by pathologists and an unstained section for SHG/TPE imaging and AI annotation using qSepta and qNodule algorithms. Re-training of qSepta and qNodule algorithms was executed based on pathologist annotations. Sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) were employed to evaluate concordance with pathologist annotations, both pre- and post-training and during validation. Post-re-training by pathologist annotations, the AI demonstrated improved sensitivity for qSepta annotations, achieving 91% post-training (versus 84% pre-training). Sensitivity for qSepta in the validation cohort also improved to 91%. Additionally, PPV significantly improved from 69% pre-training to 85% post-training and reached 94% during validation. For qNodule annotations, sensitivity increased from 82% post-training to 90% in the validation cohort, while the PPV was consistent at 95% across both training and validation cohorts.This study outlines a strategic framework for developing and validating an AI model tailored for precise histopathological assessment of MASH cirrhosis, using pathologist training and annotations. The outcomes emphasise the crucial role of disease-specific customisation of AI models, based on expert pathologist training, in improving accuracy and applicability in clinical trials, marking a step forward in understanding and addressing the histopathological evaluation of MASH cirrhosis.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信