Cover crops in organic cotton influence greenhouse gas emissions and soil microclimate

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Sk Musfiq Us Salehin, Nithya Rajan, Jake Mowrer, Kenneth D. Casey, Peter Tomlinson, Anil Somenahally, Muthu Bagavathiannan
{"title":"Cover crops in organic cotton influence greenhouse gas emissions and soil microclimate","authors":"Sk Musfiq Us Salehin,&nbsp;Nithya Rajan,&nbsp;Jake Mowrer,&nbsp;Kenneth D. Casey,&nbsp;Peter Tomlinson,&nbsp;Anil Somenahally,&nbsp;Muthu Bagavathiannan","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cover crops in organic cotton systems can offset the carbon loss typically observed in conventional systems. However, their effects on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and soil microclimate are poorly understood. Our objective was to investigate the effects of cover crops on soil carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), and methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) emissions and soil moisture and temperature dynamics in organic cotton systems. To achieve this, we used static chamber techniques with soil sensors in a field study near College Station, TX, from 2020 to 2022. Cover crops tested were oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.), Austrian winter pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.) (AWP), turnip (<i>Brassica rapa</i> subsp. <i>rapa</i>), a mixture of all three, and a fallow control. In the first year of organic transition (2020), mixed species treatment enhanced CO<sub>2</sub> emission by 39.6%, 34.4%, and 40% than AWP, turnip, and control, respectively. Compared to the control, N<sub>2</sub>O emissions were lower in AWP, turnip, and oat treatments by 77%, 57.2%, and 53% in 2020. Weed pressure and drought in 2021 and 2022 neutralized cover crops’ effect on soil GHG emissions. Soils generally acted as net CH<sub>4</sub> sinks, but the uptake did not differ among the treatments. Cover crops depleted soil moisture during their growing period, but surface residues helped retain more moisture during the cotton season. Compared to fallow, mixed species and AWP were observed to reduce soil temperature fluctuations. Therefore, in transitioning, organic systems effects of cover crops on soil GHG emissions can vary depending on weather, weed management, and the cover crop types.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"117 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agj2.21735","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21735","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cover crops in organic cotton systems can offset the carbon loss typically observed in conventional systems. However, their effects on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and soil microclimate are poorly understood. Our objective was to investigate the effects of cover crops on soil carbon dioxide (CO2), nitrous oxide (N2O), and methane (CH4) emissions and soil moisture and temperature dynamics in organic cotton systems. To achieve this, we used static chamber techniques with soil sensors in a field study near College Station, TX, from 2020 to 2022. Cover crops tested were oat (Avena sativa L.), Austrian winter pea (Pisum sativum L.) (AWP), turnip (Brassica rapa subsp. rapa), a mixture of all three, and a fallow control. In the first year of organic transition (2020), mixed species treatment enhanced CO2 emission by 39.6%, 34.4%, and 40% than AWP, turnip, and control, respectively. Compared to the control, N2O emissions were lower in AWP, turnip, and oat treatments by 77%, 57.2%, and 53% in 2020. Weed pressure and drought in 2021 and 2022 neutralized cover crops’ effect on soil GHG emissions. Soils generally acted as net CH4 sinks, but the uptake did not differ among the treatments. Cover crops depleted soil moisture during their growing period, but surface residues helped retain more moisture during the cotton season. Compared to fallow, mixed species and AWP were observed to reduce soil temperature fluctuations. Therefore, in transitioning, organic systems effects of cover crops on soil GHG emissions can vary depending on weather, weed management, and the cover crop types.

Abstract Image

有机棉覆盖作物对温室气体排放和土壤小气候的影响
有机棉系统中的覆盖作物可以抵消传统系统中常见的碳损失。然而,人们对覆盖作物对温室气体(GHG)排放和土壤小气候的影响知之甚少。我们的目标是研究覆盖作物对有机棉花系统中土壤二氧化碳 (CO2)、一氧化二氮 (N2O) 和甲烷 (CH4) 排放以及土壤水分和温度动态的影响。为此,我们从 2020 年到 2022 年在德克萨斯州学院站附近的一项田间研究中使用了带土壤传感器的静态室技术。测试的覆盖作物有燕麦(Avena sativa L.)、奥地利冬豌豆(Pisum sativum L.)(AWP)、芜菁(Brassica rapa subsp.在有机过渡的第一年(2020 年),混合物种处理比 AWP、芜菁和对照组的二氧化碳排放量分别增加了 39.6%、34.4% 和 40%。与对照相比,2020 年 AWP、芜菁和燕麦处理的一氧化二氮排放量分别减少了 77%、57.2% 和 53%。2021 年和 2022 年的杂草压力和干旱抵消了覆盖作物对土壤温室气体排放的影响。土壤通常是甲烷的净吸收汇,但不同处理对甲烷的吸收并无差异。覆盖作物在生长期间会消耗土壤水分,但地表残留物有助于在棉花生长季节保持更多水分。与休耕相比,混合物种和 AWP 可减少土壤温度波动。因此,在过渡时期的有机系统中,覆盖作物对土壤温室气体排放的影响会因天气、杂草管理和覆盖作物类型的不同而不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信