Garnet Reference Materials for In Situ Lu-Hf Geochronology

IF 2.7 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Bruno V. Ribeiro, Christopher L. Kirkland, Matthijs Smit, Kira Musiyachenko, Fawna J. Korhonen, Noreen J. Evans, Kai Rankenburg, Bradley J. McDonald, Stijn Glorie, Sarah E. Gilbert, Karsten Goemann, Ivan Belousov, Jeffrey Oalmann, Chris Clark, Sean Makin
{"title":"Garnet Reference Materials for In Situ Lu-Hf Geochronology","authors":"Bruno V. Ribeiro,&nbsp;Christopher L. Kirkland,&nbsp;Matthijs Smit,&nbsp;Kira Musiyachenko,&nbsp;Fawna J. Korhonen,&nbsp;Noreen J. Evans,&nbsp;Kai Rankenburg,&nbsp;Bradley J. McDonald,&nbsp;Stijn Glorie,&nbsp;Sarah E. Gilbert,&nbsp;Karsten Goemann,&nbsp;Ivan Belousov,&nbsp;Jeffrey Oalmann,&nbsp;Chris Clark,&nbsp;Sean Makin","doi":"10.1111/ggr.12579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>In situ</i> garnet Lu-Hf geochronology has the potential to revolutionise the chronology of petrological and tectonic processes, yet there is a paucity of well-characterised reference materials to account for laser-induced matrix-dependant elemental fractionation. Here, we characterise two reference garnets GWA-1 (Lu ~ 7.0 μg g<sup>−1</sup>) and GWA-2 (Lu ~ 8.5 μg g<sup>−1</sup>) for <i>in situ garnet</i> Lu-Hf geochronology. Isochron ages from isotope dilution Lu-Hf analyses yield crystallisation ages of 1267.0 ± 3.0 Ma with initial <sup>176</sup>Hf/<sup>177</sup>Hf<sub>i</sub> of 0.281415 ± 0.000012 (GWA-1), and 934.7 ± 1.4 Ma with <sup>176</sup>Hf/<sup>177</sup>Hf<sub>i</sub> of 0.281386 ± 0.000013 (GWA-2). <i>In situ</i> Lu-Hf analyses yield inverse isochron ages up to 10% older than the known crystallisation age due to matrix effects between garnet and reference glass (NIST SRM 610) under different instrument tuning conditions. This apparent age offset is reproducible for both materials within the same session and can be readily corrected to obtain accurate ages. Our results demonstrate that GWA-1 and GWA-2 are robust reference materials that can be used to correct for matrix-analytical effects and also to assess the accuracy of <i>in situ</i> Lu-Hf garnet analyses across a range of commonly encountered garnet compositions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12631,"journal":{"name":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","volume":"48 4","pages":"887-908"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ggr.12579","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggr.12579","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In situ garnet Lu-Hf geochronology has the potential to revolutionise the chronology of petrological and tectonic processes, yet there is a paucity of well-characterised reference materials to account for laser-induced matrix-dependant elemental fractionation. Here, we characterise two reference garnets GWA-1 (Lu ~ 7.0 μg g−1) and GWA-2 (Lu ~ 8.5 μg g−1) for in situ garnet Lu-Hf geochronology. Isochron ages from isotope dilution Lu-Hf analyses yield crystallisation ages of 1267.0 ± 3.0 Ma with initial 176Hf/177Hfi of 0.281415 ± 0.000012 (GWA-1), and 934.7 ± 1.4 Ma with 176Hf/177Hfi of 0.281386 ± 0.000013 (GWA-2). In situ Lu-Hf analyses yield inverse isochron ages up to 10% older than the known crystallisation age due to matrix effects between garnet and reference glass (NIST SRM 610) under different instrument tuning conditions. This apparent age offset is reproducible for both materials within the same session and can be readily corrected to obtain accurate ages. Our results demonstrate that GWA-1 and GWA-2 are robust reference materials that can be used to correct for matrix-analytical effects and also to assess the accuracy of in situ Lu-Hf garnet analyses across a range of commonly encountered garnet compositions.

Abstract Image

原位Lu-Hf地质年代学的石榴石参考物质
原位石榴石Lu-Hf地质年代学有可能彻底改变岩石学和构造过程的年代学,但缺乏表征良好的参考材料来解释激光诱导的依赖于基质的元素分选。本文对两个参考石榴石GWA-1 (Lu ~ 7.0 μg−1)和GWA-2 (Lu ~ 8.5 μg−1)进行了原位石榴石Lu- hf地质年代学表征。同位素稀释Lu-Hf等时线分析的结晶年龄为1267.0±3.0 Ma,初始176Hf/177Hfi为0.281415±0.000012 (GWA-1);结晶年龄为934.7±1.4 Ma,初始176Hf/177Hfi为0.281386±0.000013 (GWA-2)。在不同的仪器调谐条件下,由于石榴石和参考玻璃(NIST SRM 610)之间的基体效应,原位Lu-Hf分析得出的逆等时线年龄比已知的结晶年龄大10%。这种表观年龄偏移对同一阶段的两种材料是可重复的,并且可以很容易地纠正以获得准确的年龄。我们的研究结果表明,GWA-1和GWA-2是可靠的参考物质,可用于校正基体分析效应,也可用于评估在一系列常见石榴石成分中原位Lu-Hf石榴石分析的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geostandards & Geoanalytical Research is an international journal dedicated to advancing the science of reference materials, analytical techniques and data quality relevant to the chemical analysis of geological and environmental samples. Papers are accepted for publication following peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信