Assessing ecological risks of soil heavy metal contamination around diverse metal mining areas in China: From criteria derivation to risk attribution.

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Li Qian, Yajuan Shi, Liping Zheng, Xiangbo Xu, Qiuyun Xu, Xuan Zhou, Xuan Li, Xiuqing Shao, Jinghan Wang
{"title":"Assessing ecological risks of soil heavy metal contamination around diverse metal mining areas in China: From criteria derivation to risk attribution.","authors":"Li Qian, Yajuan Shi, Liping Zheng, Xiangbo Xu, Qiuyun Xu, Xuan Zhou, Xuan Li, Xiuqing Shao, Jinghan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serious soil heavy metal and metalloid (HM) contamination exists around metal mining areas, while lack of ecological criteria and limitation of traditional ecological risk assessment (ERA) methods hinder understanding nationwide relationship between ecological effects and soil HM exposure around diverse mining areas in China. This study derived soil total HM criteria (As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) for ecological risk screening and intervention values using model-averaged species sensitivity distributions (<span><span style=\"\"></span><span data-mathml='&lt;math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" /&gt;' role=\"presentation\" style=\"font-size: 90%; display: inline-block; position: relative;\" tabindex=\"0\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"0.24ex\" role=\"img\" style=\"vertical-align: -0.12ex;\" viewbox=\"0 -51.7 0 103.4\" width=\"0\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g fill=\"currentColor\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"0\" transform=\"matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)\"></g></svg><span role=\"presentation\"><math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"></math></span></span><script type=\"math/mml\"><math></math></script></span> s). An ERA approach, combining deterministic method adopting these criteria and probabilistic method which used the <span><span style=\"\"></span><span data-mathml='&lt;math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" /&gt;' role=\"presentation\" style=\"font-size: 90%; display: inline-block; position: relative;\" tabindex=\"0\"><svg aria-hidden=\"true\" focusable=\"false\" height=\"0.24ex\" role=\"img\" style=\"vertical-align: -0.12ex;\" viewbox=\"0 -51.7 0 103.4\" width=\"0\" xmlns:xlink=\"http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink\"><g fill=\"currentColor\" stroke=\"currentColor\" stroke-width=\"0\" transform=\"matrix(1 0 0 -1 0 0)\"></g></svg><span role=\"presentation\"><math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"></math></span></span><script type=\"math/mml\"><math></math></script></span> and removed soil background effect in exposure distribution to modify joint probability curves, was employed to assess the eco-risks of soil HMs around 151 mining areas in different mining properties and locations. Finally, the risk attribution was analyzed. The results revealed 95% of investigated mines exceeded the screening values and 75% the intervention values. Mines of non-ferrous, small-scale, underground mining and located in eastern, central, and southern China exhibited higher risk probabilities with As, Zn and Cu as priority HMs. Additionally, the eco-risks were comprehensively more subject to geo-climatic conditions than mining properties. These findings provide implications for derivation of soil ecological criteria and policymaking of tailored eco-risk management around various mining areas.","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144536","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serious soil heavy metal and metalloid (HM) contamination exists around metal mining areas, while lack of ecological criteria and limitation of traditional ecological risk assessment (ERA) methods hinder understanding nationwide relationship between ecological effects and soil HM exposure around diverse mining areas in China. This study derived soil total HM criteria (As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb and Zn) for ecological risk screening and intervention values using model-averaged species sensitivity distributions ( s). An ERA approach, combining deterministic method adopting these criteria and probabilistic method which used the and removed soil background effect in exposure distribution to modify joint probability curves, was employed to assess the eco-risks of soil HMs around 151 mining areas in different mining properties and locations. Finally, the risk attribution was analyzed. The results revealed 95% of investigated mines exceeded the screening values and 75% the intervention values. Mines of non-ferrous, small-scale, underground mining and located in eastern, central, and southern China exhibited higher risk probabilities with As, Zn and Cu as priority HMs. Additionally, the eco-risks were comprehensively more subject to geo-climatic conditions than mining properties. These findings provide implications for derivation of soil ecological criteria and policymaking of tailored eco-risk management around various mining areas.

Abstract Image

中国不同金属矿区土壤重金属污染生态风险评价:从标准推导到风险归因
金属矿区周边存在严重的土壤重金属和类金属污染,而生态标准的缺失和传统生态风险评价方法的局限性,阻碍了对全国范围内不同矿区土壤重金属暴露与生态效应关系的认识。本研究利用模型平均物种敏感性分布,导出了土壤总HM标准(As, Cd, Cu, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb和Zn)的生态风险筛选和干预值。采用确定性方法和利用暴露分布中去除土壤背景效应的概率方法相结合的ERA方法,对联合概率曲线进行了修正。对151个矿区不同矿区性质和位置的土壤HMs生态风险进行了评价。最后,对风险归因进行了分析。结果表明,95%的被调查矿山超过了筛选值,75%超过了干预值。位于中国东部、中部和南部的有色金属矿山、小型地下矿山的风险概率较高,砷、锌和铜是优先的危险因素。此外,生态风险总体上更受地质气候条件的影响,而不是采矿性质。这些发现为不同矿区土壤生态标准的推导和生态风险管理政策的制定提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信