Comparison of tip-bendable aspiration-assisted and standard access sheaths in the treatment of lower calyceal stones.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the success and complication rates of retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower calyceal renal stones performed with novel tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheaths and standard ureteral access sheaths.

Methods: Between March 2023 and March 2024, a total of 88 patients underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower renal calyceal stones smaller than 20 mm. Based on the access sheath used, patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=43) included patients treated with novel tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheaths and Group 2 (n=45) included patients treated with standard ureteral access sheaths. The pre- and postoperative data of the two groups were compared. Complications were assessed by using the Modified Clavine Dindo system, and stone-free rate was assessed after 4 weeks by using non-contrast computed tomography.

Results: There was no significant difference between the groups regarding demographic data or preoperative laboratory results, and the median stone size was comparable in both groups. The stone-free rate did not show any significant difference between the two groups. However, the median residual stone size was substantially higher in the standard ureteral access sheaths group [4.25- (3.75-5) vs. 6- (5-7), p=0.01] and the surgical duration was less in the novel tip-bendable suction ureteral access sheaths group (p=0.032).

Conclusion: Our current findings demonstrate that the use of a new tip-bendable suction-assisted access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of lower calyceal stones less than 2 cm may shorten the operative duration, limit the rate of complications, and end up with smaller residual stone fragments when compared with the use of standard ureteral access sheath.