Examining the Role of Exercise Training in Enhancing Life for Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Systematic Review.

Tugba Siyah, Naciye Vardar Yagli, Ilker Ertugrul, Hayrettin Hakan Aykan, Melda Saglam
{"title":"Examining the Role of Exercise Training in Enhancing Life for Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Systematic Review.","authors":"Tugba Siyah, Naciye Vardar Yagli, Ilker Ertugrul, Hayrettin Hakan Aykan, Melda Saglam","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current guidelines advise exercise for most congenital heart disease patients (CHD). However, physical activity remains low in CHD individuals, with limited research on exercise's effects in adults.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exercise training on exercise capacity and quality of life in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials assessing aerobic and resistance training effects on exercise capacity and quality of life in ACHD. Out of 3,517 citations, ten eligible articles were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Meta-analysis of the included randomized controlled trials (286 participants) found no significant change in peak oxygen consumption or quality of life in ACHD with exercise training (pooled mean difference = 0.33 ml/kg/min [95% CI, -0.88 to 1.54 ml/kg/min]; p = 0.60; I2= 3%). However, the increase in maximum workload was significant (pooled mean difference = 8.86 watts [95% CI, 0.78 to 16.93], p = 0.03, I2 = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our review confirms that exercise training increases the maximum workload in ACHD patients. However, the lack of a standardized protocol among exercise interventions in this population may have contributed to the absence of a significant change in peak VO2 and quality of life observed in the conducted studies. The heterogeneity of exercise programs could be a contributing factor to the inconsistency of the results. In this context, the implementation of standardized exercise protocols in future research, particularly with larger sample sizes, is crucial to enhance the comparability of outcomes. Well-designed randomized controlled trials studying structured exercise training in ACHD patients will provide clearer insights.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"121 12","pages":"e20240294"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634309/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines advise exercise for most congenital heart disease patients (CHD). However, physical activity remains low in CHD individuals, with limited research on exercise's effects in adults.

Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exercise training on exercise capacity and quality of life in adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients.

Methods: We searched PubMed/Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus through December 2022 for randomized controlled trials assessing aerobic and resistance training effects on exercise capacity and quality of life in ACHD. Out of 3,517 citations, ten eligible articles were included.

Results: Meta-analysis of the included randomized controlled trials (286 participants) found no significant change in peak oxygen consumption or quality of life in ACHD with exercise training (pooled mean difference = 0.33 ml/kg/min [95% CI, -0.88 to 1.54 ml/kg/min]; p = 0.60; I2= 3%). However, the increase in maximum workload was significant (pooled mean difference = 8.86 watts [95% CI, 0.78 to 16.93], p = 0.03, I2 = 0%).

Conclusions: Our review confirms that exercise training increases the maximum workload in ACHD patients. However, the lack of a standardized protocol among exercise interventions in this population may have contributed to the absence of a significant change in peak VO2 and quality of life observed in the conducted studies. The heterogeneity of exercise programs could be a contributing factor to the inconsistency of the results. In this context, the implementation of standardized exercise protocols in future research, particularly with larger sample sizes, is crucial to enhance the comparability of outcomes. Well-designed randomized controlled trials studying structured exercise training in ACHD patients will provide clearer insights.

检查运动训练在提高成人先天性心脏病患者寿命中的作用:系统综述。
背景:目前的指南建议大多数先天性心脏病患者(CHD)进行运动。然而,冠心病患者的体育活动仍然很低,关于运动对成年人影响的研究有限。目的:本研究的目的是评估运动训练对成人先天性心脏病(ACHD)患者运动能力和生活质量的安全性和有效性。方法:我们检索PubMed/Medline、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Scopus,检索截至2022年12月的随机对照试验,评估有氧和阻力训练对ACHD运动能力和生活质量的影响。在3517次引用中,有10篇符合条件的文章被纳入。结果:纳入的随机对照试验(286名参与者)的荟萃分析发现,运动训练对ACHD患者的峰值耗氧量或生活质量没有显著改变(合并平均差异= 0.33 ml/kg/min [95% CI, -0.88至1.54 ml/kg/min];P = 0.60;I2 = 3%)。然而,最大工作负荷的增加是显著的(合并平均差异= 8.86瓦[95% CI, 0.78至16.93],p = 0.03, I2 = 0%)。结论:我们的综述证实,运动训练增加了ACHD患者的最大工作量。然而,在这一人群中缺乏标准化的运动干预方案可能导致在进行的研究中观察到的峰值VO2和生活质量没有显著变化。运动项目的异质性可能是导致结果不一致的一个因素。在这种情况下,在未来的研究中实施标准化的运动方案,特别是在更大的样本量下,对于增强结果的可比性至关重要。精心设计的随机对照试验研究有组织的运动训练对急性动脉粥样硬化性肾病患者的影响,将提供更清晰的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信