Greg J Fox, Nguyen Viet Nhung, Nguyen Cam Binh, Nguyen Binh Hoa, Frances L Garden, Andrea Benedetti, Pham Ngoc Yen, Nguyen Kim Cuong, Emily L MacLean, H Manisha Yapa, David W Dowdy, Nguyen Huu Lan, Elyse Guevara-Rattray, Pham Duc Cuong, Ori Solomon, Marcel A Behr, Ben J Marais, Steven M Graham, Dick Menzies, Nguyen Thu Anh, Guy B Marks
{"title":"Levofloxacin for the Prevention of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis in Vietnam.","authors":"Greg J Fox, Nguyen Viet Nhung, Nguyen Cam Binh, Nguyen Binh Hoa, Frances L Garden, Andrea Benedetti, Pham Ngoc Yen, Nguyen Kim Cuong, Emily L MacLean, H Manisha Yapa, David W Dowdy, Nguyen Huu Lan, Elyse Guevara-Rattray, Pham Duc Cuong, Ori Solomon, Marcel A Behr, Ben J Marais, Steven M Graham, Dick Menzies, Nguyen Thu Anh, Guy B Marks","doi":"10.1056/NEJMoa2314325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prevention of drug-resistant tuberculosis is a global health priority. However, trials evaluating the effectiveness of treating <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> infection among contacts of persons with drug-resistant tuberculosis are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing 6 months of daily levofloxacin (weight-based doses) with placebo to treat <i>M. tuberculosis</i> infection. The trial population comprised household contacts of persons with bacteriologically confirmed rifampicin-resistant or multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Vietnam. Contacts of any age with a positive tuberculin skin test or immunologic impairment were eligible. The primary end point was bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis within 30 months. Secondary end points included grade 3 or 4 adverse events, death from any cause, and acquired drug resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 3948 persons screened for eligibility, 61 (1.5%) had coprevalent tuberculosis (defined as active tuberculosis disease diagnosed before randomization) and 2041 underwent randomization. Of these 2041 participants, 1995 (97.7%) completed 30 months of follow-up, had a primary end-point event, or died. Confirmed tuberculosis occurred in 6 participants (0.6%) in the levofloxacin group and 11 (1.1%) in the placebo group (incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 1.62); this difference was not significant. There was little difference in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the two groups (risk difference, 1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.3 to 2.4). Adverse events of any grade were reported in 306 participants (31.9%) taking levofloxacin and 125 (13.0%) taking placebo (risk difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 14.2 to 23.6). No acquired fluoroquinolone resistance was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the incidence of tuberculosis was lower in the levofloxacin group than in the placebo group at 30 months, the difference was not significant. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; VQUIN MDR Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000215426.).</p>","PeriodicalId":54725,"journal":{"name":"New England Journal of Medicine","volume":"391 24","pages":"2304-2314"},"PeriodicalIF":96.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New England Journal of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2314325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Prevention of drug-resistant tuberculosis is a global health priority. However, trials evaluating the effectiveness of treating Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection among contacts of persons with drug-resistant tuberculosis are lacking.
Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing 6 months of daily levofloxacin (weight-based doses) with placebo to treat M. tuberculosis infection. The trial population comprised household contacts of persons with bacteriologically confirmed rifampicin-resistant or multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis in Vietnam. Contacts of any age with a positive tuberculin skin test or immunologic impairment were eligible. The primary end point was bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis within 30 months. Secondary end points included grade 3 or 4 adverse events, death from any cause, and acquired drug resistance.
Results: Of 3948 persons screened for eligibility, 61 (1.5%) had coprevalent tuberculosis (defined as active tuberculosis disease diagnosed before randomization) and 2041 underwent randomization. Of these 2041 participants, 1995 (97.7%) completed 30 months of follow-up, had a primary end-point event, or died. Confirmed tuberculosis occurred in 6 participants (0.6%) in the levofloxacin group and 11 (1.1%) in the placebo group (incidence rate ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.19 to 1.62); this difference was not significant. There was little difference in grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the two groups (risk difference, 1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -0.3 to 2.4). Adverse events of any grade were reported in 306 participants (31.9%) taking levofloxacin and 125 (13.0%) taking placebo (risk difference, 18.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 14.2 to 23.6). No acquired fluoroquinolone resistance was observed.
Conclusions: Although the incidence of tuberculosis was lower in the levofloxacin group than in the placebo group at 30 months, the difference was not significant. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; VQUIN MDR Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry number, ACTRN12616000215426.).
期刊介绍:
The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stands as the foremost medical journal and website worldwide. With an impressive history spanning over two centuries, NEJM boasts a consistent publication of superb, peer-reviewed research and engaging clinical content. Our primary objective revolves around delivering high-caliber information and findings at the juncture of biomedical science and clinical practice. We strive to present this knowledge in formats that are not only comprehensible but also hold practical value, effectively influencing healthcare practices and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes.