[Associations between fall injury rates and instrumentation, equipment, and use among community-dwelling older adults: Computation using emergency medical service records].

Tetsuya Shimizu, Michiko Bando, Yasuko Aso, Tetsuji Yokoyama
{"title":"[Associations between fall injury rates and instrumentation, equipment, and use among community-dwelling older adults: Computation using emergency medical service records].","authors":"Tetsuya Shimizu, Michiko Bando, Yasuko Aso, Tetsuji Yokoyama","doi":"10.11236/jph.24-022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Objective This study aimed to examine the instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with falls among community-dwelling older adults, assess the injury rates by instrumentation, equipment, and use according to the characteristics of individuals with injuries, and identify the instrumentation, equipment, and use that cause severe injury.Methods We analyzed individuals aged ≥ 65 years who experienced falls on their property and required emergency medical transport to a hospital in 2019. The fire departments in Saitama Prefecture provided relevant emergency records. We calculated injury rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per 100,000 person-years for each age group (classified as 65-74, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years), sex for each type of instrumentation, equipment, and use, and the number of moderate or severe injuries and their percentages. The instrumentation and equipment associated with falls were categorized using ICD-10 and subdivided according to the conditions of use. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with moderate or severe injuries, after adjusting for sex and age groups, with the floor as a reference.Results This study included 4,421 patients. Patients were categorized according to 44 types of instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with falls. Overall, 2,154 cases (48.7%) were classified as moderate or severe injuries. Older adults had higher fall injury rates on floors (injury rates; 450.9, 95% CI; 434.5-467.9), stairs (76.6, 69.9-83.8), beds (25.5, 21.7-29.8), steps (21.2, 17.7-25.1), and toilets (14.5, 11.6-17.8), with differences on instrumentation, equipment, and use, sex, and age groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds ratio (OR) for moderate or severe injuries was higher for falls occurring on the roof (OR; 8.95, 95% CI; 1.52-169.40).Conclusion Fall injury rates and the characteristics of injured individuals among community-dwelling older adults differ based on the instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with falls. The implementation of measures to mitigate the external factors associated with this risk is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":72032,"journal":{"name":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"[Nihon koshu eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11236/jph.24-022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to examine the instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with falls among community-dwelling older adults, assess the injury rates by instrumentation, equipment, and use according to the characteristics of individuals with injuries, and identify the instrumentation, equipment, and use that cause severe injury.Methods We analyzed individuals aged ≥ 65 years who experienced falls on their property and required emergency medical transport to a hospital in 2019. The fire departments in Saitama Prefecture provided relevant emergency records. We calculated injury rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) per 100,000 person-years for each age group (classified as 65-74, 75-84, and ≥ 85 years), sex for each type of instrumentation, equipment, and use, and the number of moderate or severe injuries and their percentages. The instrumentation and equipment associated with falls were categorized using ICD-10 and subdivided according to the conditions of use. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with moderate or severe injuries, after adjusting for sex and age groups, with the floor as a reference.Results This study included 4,421 patients. Patients were categorized according to 44 types of instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with falls. Overall, 2,154 cases (48.7%) were classified as moderate or severe injuries. Older adults had higher fall injury rates on floors (injury rates; 450.9, 95% CI; 434.5-467.9), stairs (76.6, 69.9-83.8), beds (25.5, 21.7-29.8), steps (21.2, 17.7-25.1), and toilets (14.5, 11.6-17.8), with differences on instrumentation, equipment, and use, sex, and age groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds ratio (OR) for moderate or severe injuries was higher for falls occurring on the roof (OR; 8.95, 95% CI; 1.52-169.40).Conclusion Fall injury rates and the characteristics of injured individuals among community-dwelling older adults differ based on the instrumentation, equipment, and use associated with falls. The implementation of measures to mitigate the external factors associated with this risk is necessary.

[在社区居住的老年人中跌倒伤害率与器械、设备和使用之间的关系:使用紧急医疗服务记录的计算]。
目的本研究旨在调查与社区老年人跌倒相关的器械、设备和使用,根据受伤个体的特点评估器械、设备和使用的伤害率,并确定导致严重伤害的器械、设备和使用。方法:我们分析了2019年在其财产上经历跌倒并需要紧急医疗转运到医院的年龄≥65岁的个体。埼玉县消防部门提供了相关的应急记录。我们计算了每个年龄组(65-74岁、75-84岁和≥85岁)每10万人年的损伤率和95%置信区间(CI),每种仪器、设备和使用的性别,以及中度或重度损伤的数量及其百分比。使用ICD-10对与跌倒相关的仪器和设备进行分类,并根据使用条件进行细分。在对性别和年龄组进行调整后,以地板为参考,进行了Logistic回归分析,以确定与中度或重度损伤相关的仪器、设备和使用。结果共纳入4421例患者。根据44种与跌倒相关的器械、设备和用途对患者进行分类。总的来说,2154例(48.7%)被分类为中度或重度损伤。老年人在地板上摔倒的伤害率更高(伤害率;450.9, 95% ci;434.5-467.9)、楼梯(76.6,69.9-83.8)、床(25.5,21.7-29.8)、台阶(21.2,17.7-25.1)和厕所(14.5,11.6-17.8),在仪器、设备和使用、性别和年龄组上存在差异。Logistic回归分析显示,发生在屋顶上的中度或重度损伤的优势比(OR)更高(OR;8.95, 95% ci;1.52 - -169.40)。结论社区老年人跌倒损伤发生率和受伤个体的特征因跌倒相关器械、器械和使用的不同而不同。有必要采取措施减轻与这一风险有关的外部因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信